From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Jing Liu <jing2.liu@linux.intel.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"Cooper, Andrew" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Thoughts of AMX KVM support based on latest kernel
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:53:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7d87723-5533-257f-fbf0-ecd3a0b96602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5433D6A1368904D9B748846B8C9A9@BN9PR11MB5433.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 11/17/21 11:15, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> We are not sure whether such trick is worthwhile, since a sane
> guest shouldn't set XFD[AMX]=1 before storing the AMX state. This
> is why we want to seek SDM change to mark out that the software
> should not assume XTILEDATA is still valid when XFD[AMX]=1.
Okay, I just don't want it to be called out as virtualization specific.
It doesn't have to happen in current processors, but it should be
architecturally valid behavior to clear the processor's state as soon as
a bit in XFD is set to 1.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 13:01 Thoughts of AMX KVM support based on latest kernel Liu, Jing2
2021-11-16 12:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-16 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-16 18:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-16 19:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-16 20:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-16 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-16 22:11 ` Nakajima, Jun
2021-11-17 7:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-16 20:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-16 23:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-16 19:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-17 4:52 ` Nakajima, Jun
2021-11-17 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-17 10:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-17 12:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-17 12:53 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-11-18 23:17 ` Nakajima, Jun
2021-11-19 10:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-19 15:41 ` Nakajima, Jun
2021-12-08 0:50 ` Rewording of Setting IA32_XFD[18] (Re: Thoughts of AMX KVM support based on latest kernel) Nakajima, Jun
2021-12-08 13:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7d87723-5533-257f-fbf0-ecd3a0b96602@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).