* [PATCH] e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value.
@ 2017-12-18 16:50 rwarsow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rwarsow @ 2017-12-18 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
hallo
any chance to get this patch into stable ?
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151297726823919&w=2
--
Greeting
Ronald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value.
@ 2018-01-10 1:50 rwarsow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rwarsow @ 2018-01-10 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, bpoirier
...
thanks for quick supoort !!!
--
Greeting
Ronald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value.
@ 2018-01-10 0:29 rwarsow
2018-01-10 1:34 ` Benjamin Poirier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: rwarsow @ 2018-01-10 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, bpoirier
hallo
any chance to get this patch into stable and 4.15 ?
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151297726823919&w=2
CC'ed: Benjamin Poirier
--
Greeting
Ronald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value.
2018-01-10 0:29 rwarsow
@ 2018-01-10 1:34 ` Benjamin Poirier
2018-01-14 8:23 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Poirier @ 2018-01-10 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rwarsow; +Cc: linux-kernel, stable, netdev, intel-wired-lan
On 2018/01/10 01:29, rwarsow@gmx.de wrote:
> hallo
>
> any chance to get this patch into stable and 4.15 ?
>
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151297726823919&w=2
>
It was part of the last network pull request and should be included in
the next mainline release as
4110e02eb45e e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value.
It's needed in stable branches that include commit 19110cfbb34d
("e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up"):
linux-4.14.y
linux-4.9.y
linux-4.4.y
linux-4.1.y
linux-3.18.y
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value.
2018-01-10 1:34 ` Benjamin Poirier
@ 2018-01-14 8:23 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2018-01-14 8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Poirier; +Cc: rwarsow, linux-kernel, stable, netdev, intel-wired-lan
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:34:43AM +0900, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> On 2018/01/10 01:29, rwarsow@gmx.de wrote:
> > hallo
> >
> > any chance to get this patch into stable and 4.15 ?
> >
> > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151297726823919&w=2
> >
>
> It was part of the last network pull request and should be included in
> the next mainline release as
> 4110e02eb45e e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value.
>
> It's needed in stable branches that include commit 19110cfbb34d
> ("e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up"):
> linux-4.14.y
> linux-4.9.y
> linux-4.4.y
> linux-4.1.y
> linux-3.18.y
Now queued up, thanks!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4.4 71/96] e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up
@ 2017-12-08 10:45 Christian Hesse
2017-12-11 7:26 ` [PATCH] e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value Benjamin Poirier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Hesse @ 2017-12-08 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Poirier
Cc: Ben Hutchings, Gabriel C, Jeff Kirsher, stable, Lennart Sorensen,
Aaron Brown, Amit Pundir, Greg Kroah-Hartman, LKML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3293 bytes --]
Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com> on Fri, 2017/12/08 17:34:
> On 2017/12/07 20:02, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 11:23 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> > >
> > > ------------------
> > >
> > > From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
> > >
> > > commit 19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013 upstream.
> > [...]
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
> > > @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ void e1000e_clear_hw_cntrs_base(struct e
> > > * Checks to see of the link status of the hardware has changed. If a
> > > * change in link status has been detected, then we read the PHY
> > > registers
> > > * to get the current speed/duplex if link exists.
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns a negative error code (-E1000_ERR_*) or 0 (link down) or 1
> > > (link
> > > + * up).
> > > **/
> > > s32 e1000e_check_for_copper_link(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> > > {
> > [...]
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > > @@ -5017,7 +5017,7 @@ static bool e1000e_has_link(struct e1000
> > > > case e1000_media_type_copper:
> > > > if (hw->mac.get_link_status) {
> > > > ret_val = hw->mac.ops.check_for_link(hw);
> > > > - link_active = !hw->mac.get_link_status;
> > > > + link_active = ret_val > 0;
> > > > } else {
> > > > link_active = true;
> > > > }
> >
> > As this change in e1000e_has_link() is conditional only on the media
> > type, doesn't e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan() also need to be
> > changed to return 1 for link up?
>
> You're right. I looked at it again, in the commit log I wrote that
> "hw->mac.ops.check_for_link(hw) === e1000e_check_for_copper_link" which
> is true for the race condition reported (because that's the function in
> use on adapters that have msix vectors mac.type == e1000_82574) but not
> generally true. The other check_for_link callback needs to be adjusted
> likewise.
>
> However, I happen to have a I218-LM (e1000_pch_lpt) so I tested 4.14.3
> and this error only delays link up, it doesn't prevent it.
> e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan() sets mac->get_link_status = false;
> and on the next watchdog execution, we fall in the second branch of the
> following e1000e_has_link code:
>
> case e1000_media_type_copper:
> if (hw->mac.get_link_status) {
> ret_val = hw->mac.ops.check_for_link(hw);
> link_active = ret_val > 0;
> } else {
> link_active = true;
>
> OTOH, there are multiple reports in
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047
> that reverting 830466993daf ("e1000e: Separate signaling for link
> check/link up") fixes the issue so there's something I'm missing.
>
> Gabriel and Christian, can you test the following patch?
With this patch applied my connection is up and running again. Thanks!
--
main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/* Best regards my address: */=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/* Chris cc -ox -xc - && ./x */b/42*2-3)*42);}
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value.
2017-12-08 10:45 [PATCH 4.4 71/96] e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up Christian Hesse
@ 2017-12-11 7:26 ` Benjamin Poirier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Poirier @ 2017-12-11 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Kirsher
Cc: Ben Hutchings, Christian Hesse, Gabriel C, intel-wired-lan,
netdev, linux-kernel, stable
e1000e_check_for_copper_link() and e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan()
are the two functions that may be assigned to mac.ops.check_for_link when
phy.media_type == e1000_media_type_copper. Commit 19110cfbb34d ("e1000e:
Separate signaling for link check/link up") changed the meaning of the
return value of check_for_link for copper media but only adjusted the first
function. This patch adjusts the second function likewise.
Reported-by: Christian Hesse <list@eworm.de>
Reported-by: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@gmail.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047
Fixes: 19110cfbb34d ("e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up")
Tested-by: Christian Hesse <list@eworm.de>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
index d6d4ed7acf03..31277d3bb7dc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
@@ -1367,6 +1367,9 @@ static s32 e1000_disable_ulp_lpt_lp(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool force)
* Checks to see of the link status of the hardware has changed. If a
* change in link status has been detected, then we read the PHY registers
* to get the current speed/duplex if link exists.
+ *
+ * Returns a negative error code (-E1000_ERR_*) or 0 (link down) or 1 (link
+ * up).
**/
static s32 e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
{
@@ -1382,7 +1385,7 @@ static s32 e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
* Change or Rx Sequence Error interrupt.
*/
if (!mac->get_link_status)
- return 0;
+ return 1;
/* First we want to see if the MII Status Register reports
* link. If so, then we want to get the current speed/duplex
@@ -1613,10 +1616,12 @@ static s32 e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
* different link partner.
*/
ret_val = e1000e_config_fc_after_link_up(hw);
- if (ret_val)
+ if (ret_val) {
e_dbg("Error configuring flow control\n");
+ return ret_val;
+ }
- return ret_val;
+ return 1;
}
static s32 e1000_get_variants_ich8lan(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
--
2.15.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-14 8:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-18 16:50 [PATCH] e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value rwarsow
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-10 1:50 rwarsow
2018-01-10 0:29 rwarsow
2018-01-10 1:34 ` Benjamin Poirier
2018-01-14 8:23 ` Greg KH
2017-12-08 10:45 [PATCH 4.4 71/96] e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up Christian Hesse
2017-12-11 7:26 ` [PATCH] e1000e: Fix e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan return value Benjamin Poirier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).