Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation, dt, numa: Add note to empty NUMA node

[Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>]

On 6/25/21 2:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 6/24/21 9:32 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On 6/25/21 1:47 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 6/24/21 9:30 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>>> The empty NUMA nodes, where no memory resides in, are allowed. For
>>>> these empty NUMA nodes, the 'len' of 'reg' property is zero. These
>>>> empty NUMA node IDs are still valid and parsed. I finds difficulty
>>>> to get where it's properly documented.
>>>>
>>>> So lets add note to empty NUMA nodes in the NUMA binding doc.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt | 4 ++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt
>>>> index 21b35053ca5a..edf728cff155 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt
>>>> @@ -109,6 +109,10 @@ Example:
>>>>    Dual socket system consists of 2 boards connected through ccn bus and
>>>>    each board having one socket/soc of 8 cpus, memory and pci bus.
>>>>    +Note that the empty NUMA nodes, which no memory resides in, are allowed.
>>>
>>> I would write that without "the":
>>>
>>> +Note that empty NUMA nodes, which no memory resides in, are allowed.
>>>
>>> BTW, AFAIK, NUMA nodes may contain memory, CPU(s), or I/O -- any one, two, or
>>> three, without the other types of resources being present.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, I will drop "the" in v4.
>>
>> The NUMA nodes here are memory nodes here. Since the NUMA node usually means
>> memory node. I'm not sure if I change the term "NUMA node" to "NUMA memory
>> node" in v4. If you agree, I would have something like this:
>>
>> Note that empty memory nodes, which no memory resides in, are allowed.
>> The NUMA node IDs in these empty memory nodes are still valid, but memory
>> can be added into them through hotplug afterwards.
> 
> OK, that sounds fine to me.
> 

Thanks, Randy. I just posted v4 to include the changes.

Thanks,
Gavin