[RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Steve Twiss]

From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>

Regulator support for the DA9061 is added into the DA9062 regulator driver.
 
The regulators for DA9061 differ from those of DA9062.
A new DA9061 enumeration list for the LDOs and Bucks supported by this
device is added. Regulator information added: the old regulator
information for DA9062 is renamed from local_regulator_info[] to
local_da9062_regulator_info[] and a new array is added to support
local_da9061_regulator_info[].

The probe() function switches on the da9062_compatible_types enumeration
and configures the correct da9062_regulator_info array and number of
regulator entries.

Kconfig is updated to reflect support for DA9061 and DA9062 regulators.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>

---

Hi Mark,

On 06 June 2017 20:03, Mark Brown wrote:

> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO
> regulator driver
> 
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:17:59AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:32:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > Plan is to push this through the MFD tree.
> > > Great, thanks.
> > Just taking a look at this now.  It looks like the dependency:
> >   656211b1dfb9 mfd: Add support for DA9061
> > ... is now in Mainline.  Therefore it should be okay to take this
> > directly through the Regulator repo.
> 
> OK, can you resend please Steve?

Thanks for taking this patch.

Regards,
Steve

This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
against x86_64.

The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-mainline
by Lee Jones. If there is anything in the way of this patch acceptance,
could you please let me know?

This patch applies against linux-next and v4.12-rc2

v6 -> v7
 - NO CODE CHANGE
 - Compile tested ARCH=x86_64

v5 -> v6
 - Rebased from v4.9 to v4.11-rc3
 - Modify Copyright to match Dialog latest legal statement

v4 -> v5
 - Rebased from v4.8 to v4.9
 - NO CODE CHANGE

v3 -> v4
 - NO CODE CHANGE
 - Patch renamed from [PATCH V3 6/9] to [PATCH V4 5/8]

v2 -> v3
 - NO CODE CHANGE
 - Patch renamed from [PATCH V2 06/10] to [PATCH V3 6/9]
 - Added Ack from Mark Brown

v1 -> v2
 - Patch renamed from [PATCH V1 02/10] to [PATCH V2 06/10] -- these
   changes were made to fix checkpatch warnings caused by the patch
   set dependency order
 - Updated header to use DA9061 and DA9062

As previously:

These changes depend on a header file provided as part of an earlier
patch [V7,4/7] mfd: da9061: MFD core support from this set. The regulator
probe() switches on the chip_type which uses enum da9062_compatible_types
in core.h from this patch.

Regards,
Steve Twiss, Dialog Semiconductor


 drivers/regulator/Kconfig            |   4 +-
 drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c | 303 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
index 48db87d..9d2222e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
@@ -214,11 +214,11 @@ config REGULATOR_DA9055
 	  will be called da9055-regulator.
 
 config REGULATOR_DA9062
-	tristate "Dialog Semiconductor DA9062 regulators"
+	tristate "Dialog Semiconductor DA9061/62 regulators"
 	depends on MFD_DA9062
 	help
 	  Say y here to support the BUCKs and LDOs regulators found on
-	  DA9062 PMICs.
+	  DA9061 and DA9062 PMICs.
 
 	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
 	  will be called da9062-regulator.
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
index 0638c8b..34a70d9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /*
- * da9062-regulator.c - REGULATOR device driver for DA9062
- * Copyright (C) 2015  Dialog Semiconductor Ltd.
+ * Regulator device driver for DA9061 and DA9062.
+ * Copyright (C) 2015-2017  Dialog Semiconductor
  *
  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
@@ -28,6 +28,17 @@
 
 /* Regulator IDs */
 enum {
+	DA9061_ID_BUCK1,
+	DA9061_ID_BUCK2,
+	DA9061_ID_BUCK3,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO1,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO2,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO3,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO4,
+	DA9061_MAX_REGULATORS,
+};
+
+enum {
 	DA9062_ID_BUCK1,
 	DA9062_ID_BUCK2,
 	DA9062_ID_BUCK3,
@@ -88,15 +99,21 @@ enum {
 
 /* Regulator operations */
 
-/* Current limits array (in uA) BUCK1 and BUCK3.
-   Entry indexes corresponds to register values. */
+/* Current limits array (in uA)
+ * - DA9061_ID_[BUCK1|BUCK3]
+ * - DA9062_ID_[BUCK1|BUCK2|BUCK4]
+ * Entry indexes corresponds to register values.
+ */
 static const int da9062_buck_a_limits[] = {
 	 500000,  600000,  700000,  800000,  900000, 1000000, 1100000, 1200000,
 	1300000, 1400000, 1500000, 1600000, 1700000, 1800000, 1900000, 2000000
 };
 
-/* Current limits array (in uA) for BUCK2.
-   Entry indexes corresponds to register values. */
+/* Current limits array (in uA)
+ * - DA9061_ID_BUCK2
+ * - DA9062_ID_BUCK3
+ * Entry indexes corresponds to register values.
+ */
 static const int da9062_buck_b_limits[] = {
 	1500000, 1600000, 1700000, 1800000, 1900000, 2000000, 2100000, 2200000,
 	2300000, 2400000, 2500000, 2600000, 2700000, 2800000, 2900000, 3000000
@@ -405,8 +422,254 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	.set_suspend_mode	= da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode,
 };
 
-/* Regulator information */
-static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_regulator_info[] = {
+/* DA9061 Regulator information */
+static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK1,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 BUCK1",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("buck1"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_buck_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (300) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (10) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((1570) - (300))/(10) + 1,
+		.current_limits = da9062_buck_a_limits,
+		.n_current_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_buck_a_limits),
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_BUCK1_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_BUCK1_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK1_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VBUCK1_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK1_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK1_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK1_B,
+		.mode = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK1_CFG,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_MODE_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_MODE_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK1_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VBUCK1_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.ilimit = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK_ILIM_C,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK2,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 BUCK2",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("buck2"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_buck_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (800) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (20) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3340) - (800))/(20) + 1,
+		.current_limits = da9062_buck_b_limits,
+		.n_current_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_buck_b_limits),
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_BUCK3_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_BUCK3_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK3_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VBUCK3_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK3_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK3_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK3_B,
+		.mode = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK3_CFG,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_MODE_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_MODE_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK3_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VBUCK3_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.ilimit = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK_ILIM_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK3,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 BUCK3",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("buck3"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_buck_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (530) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (10) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((1800) - (530))/(10) + 1,
+		.current_limits = da9062_buck_a_limits,
+		.n_current_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_buck_a_limits),
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_BUCK4_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_BUCK4_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK4_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VBUCK4_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK4_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK4_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK4_B,
+		.mode = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK4_CFG,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_MODE_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_MODE_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK4_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VBUCK4_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.ilimit = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK_ILIM_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO1,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO1",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo1"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO1_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO1_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO1_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO1_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO1_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO1_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO1_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO2,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO2",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo2"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (600))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO2_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO2_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO2_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO2_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO2_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO2_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO2_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO3,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO3",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo3"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO3_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO3_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO3_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO3_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO3_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO3_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO3_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO4,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO4",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo4"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO4_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO4_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO4_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO4_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO4_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO4_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO4_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+};
+
+/* DA9062 Regulator information */
+static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
 	{
 		.desc.id = DA9062_ID_BUCK1,
 		.desc.name = "DA9062 BUCK1",
@@ -727,17 +990,33 @@ static int da9062_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct da9062_regulators *regulators;
 	struct da9062_regulator *regl;
 	struct regulator_config config = { };
+	const struct da9062_regulator_info *rinfo;
 	int irq, n, ret;
 	size_t size;
+	int max_regulators;
+
+	switch (chip->chip_type) {
+	case COMPAT_TYPE_DA9061:
+		max_regulators = DA9061_MAX_REGULATORS;
+		rinfo = local_da9061_regulator_info;
+		break;
+	case COMPAT_TYPE_DA9062:
+		max_regulators = DA9062_MAX_REGULATORS;
+		rinfo = local_da9062_regulator_info;
+		break;
+	default:
+		dev_err(chip->dev, "Unrecognised chip type\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	/* Allocate memory required by usable regulators */
 	size = sizeof(struct da9062_regulators) +
-		DA9062_MAX_REGULATORS * sizeof(struct da9062_regulator);
+		max_regulators * sizeof(struct da9062_regulator);
 	regulators = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!regulators)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	regulators->n_regulators = DA9062_MAX_REGULATORS;
+	regulators->n_regulators = max_regulators;
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, regulators);
 
 	n = 0;
@@ -745,7 +1024,7 @@ static int da9062_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		/* Initialise regulator structure */
 		regl = &regulators->regulator[n];
 		regl->hw = chip;
-		regl->info = &local_regulator_info[n];
+		regl->info = &rinfo[n];
 		regl->desc = regl->info->desc;
 		regl->desc.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
 		regl->desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
@@ -836,6 +1115,6 @@ static void __exit da9062_regulator_cleanup(void)
 
 /* Module information */
 MODULE_AUTHOR("S Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("REGULATOR device driver for Dialog DA9062");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("REGULATOR device driver for Dialog DA9062 and DA9061");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_ALIAS("platform:da9062-regulators");
-- 
end-of-patch for RESEND PATCH V7

Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 301 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 09:13:48AM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
> 
> Regulator support for the DA9061 is added into the DA9062 regulator driver.

I'm missing the other patches in this series and the cover letter, what
are the dependencies here?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

RE: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Steve Twiss]

Hi Mark,

On 07 June 2017 10:42, Mark Brown wrote:

> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver
> 
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 09:13:48AM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> > From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
> >
> > Regulator support for the DA9061 is added into the DA9062 regulator driver.
> 
> I'm missing the other patches in this series and the cover letter, what
> are the dependencies here?

My apologies Mark. I didn't re-send the cover letter because this regulator
patch is the last one and I assumed it would not add anything.
Am I confusing you here by not renaming the patch and leaving its subject
as [PATCH V7 5/7]?

This whole DA9061 patch set was a very long time in the submission process.
You Acked the DA9061 regulator patch back in 2016, but it had a compile
dependency with the DA9061 MFD patch so it had to wait until that got
approved. If the regulator patch had got in first, it would have broken
the build.

The MFD patch contained a change to the ./include/linux/mfd/da9062/core.h
file -- it had a new enum for da9062_compatible_types and these values were
used in the MFD, but also appeared in the regulator patch as part of the
da9062_regulator_probe().

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=656211b1dfb9e0b68d4e634931432e29a6facf46

According to my records, I think the MFD made it into linux-mainline/v4.12-rc1
as part of Lee Jones'  e-mail "[GIT PULL] MFD for v4.12"
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/3/91 [I can't check that link, LKML is down atm].
Once the MFD change for DA9062/1 had been added, this unblocked the 
patch for the regulators.

In my test environment here, I've tested the DA9061 and the build by patching 
v4.12-rc2 with the remaining DA9061 regulator patch.

I'm not sure the cover letter for the original V7 patch set will explain much, but I
will resend again, this time with the cover letter.

Regards,
Steve

The original components of the PATCH V7 are as follows:
[v7,1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9649905/
[v7,2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9649921/
[v7,3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9649889/
[v7,4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9649927/
[v7,5] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9649895/
[v7,6] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9649917/
[v7,7] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9649913/

Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 859 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:09:56PM +0000, Steve Twiss wrote:
> On 07 June 2017 10:42, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm missing the other patches in this series and the cover letter, what
> > are the dependencies here?

> My apologies Mark. I didn't re-send the cover letter because this regulator
> patch is the last one and I assumed it would not add anything.
> Am I confusing you here by not renaming the patch and leaving its subject
> as [PATCH V7 5/7]?

Yes, you are confusing things.  You're missing the point of numbering
patches in a series, it's so that when working with a set of patches
that have been posted pople know what order to apply them in.  The
numbering only means anything in a given posting of the series, if
something is resent it doesn't matter if it was posted before the
numbering should reflect what's being posted at the current time.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 488 bytes --]

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:17:59AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:

> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:32:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> > > Plan is to push this through the MFD tree.

> > Great, thanks.

> Just taking a look at this now.  It looks like the dependency:

>   656211b1dfb9 mfd: Add support for DA9061

> ... is now in Mainline.  Therefore it should be okay to take this
> directly through the Regulator repo.

OK, can you resend please Steve?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 24 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:32:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > Plan is to push this through the MFD tree.
> 
> Great, thanks.

Just taking a look at this now.  It looks like the dependency:

  656211b1dfb9 mfd: Add support for DA9061

... is now in Mainline.  Therefore it should be okay to take this
directly through the Regulator repo.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 388 bytes --]

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:32:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> Plan is to push this through the MFD tree.

Great, thanks.

> Do you want a PR for this one?

Ideally but it's not super urgent if (I've started handling these by
keeping a note of the pull information and only merging if there's an
actual problem, that way there's less cross tree merges show up when I
send stuff to Linus).

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 24 May 2017, Steve Twiss wrote:

> On 23 May 2017 18:17 Mark Brown
> > To: Steve Twiss
> > Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver
> > 
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> > 
> > > This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
> > > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
> > > I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
> > > code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
> > > slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
> > > against x86_64.
> > 
> > > The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
> > > by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
> > > acceptance, could you please let me know?
> > 
> > Given that I've acked this and it depends on the MFD changes I'd have
> > expected Lee to apply it.  If nothing else happens I can apply it after
> > the next merge window, otherwise either Lee needs to send me a pull
> > request for the MFD change so I've got the dependency or he needs to
> > apply this.
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Thanks,
> No problem, just some minor administration.
> 
> @Lee
> Could you please send Mark a pull request for the regulator component to the
> DA9062/61 changes [PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator
> driver.

That wasn't one of the options. ;)

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 23 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> 
> > This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
> > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
> > I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
> > code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
> > slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
> > against x86_64.
> 
> > The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
> > by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
> > acceptance, could you please let me know?
> 
> Given that I've acked this and it depends on the MFD changes I'd have
> expected Lee to apply it.  If nothing else happens I can apply it after
> the next merge window, otherwise either Lee needs to send me a pull
> request for the MFD change so I've got the dependency or he needs to
> apply this.

Plan is to push this through the MFD tree.

Do you want a PR for this one?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

RE: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Steve Twiss]

On 23 May 2017 18:17 Mark Brown
> To: Steve Twiss
> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver
> 
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> 
> > This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
> > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
> > I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
> > code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
> > slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
> > against x86_64.
> 
> > The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
> > by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
> > acceptance, could you please let me know?
> 
> Given that I've acked this and it depends on the MFD changes I'd have
> expected Lee to apply it.  If nothing else happens I can apply it after
> the next merge window, otherwise either Lee needs to send me a pull
> request for the MFD change so I've got the dependency or he needs to
> apply this.

Hi Mark,

Thanks,
No problem, just some minor administration.

@Lee
Could you please send Mark a pull request for the regulator component to the
DA9062/61 changes [PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator
driver.

Regards,
Steve

Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 911 bytes --]

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:

> This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
> I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
> code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
> slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
> against x86_64.

> The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
> by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
> acceptance, could you please let me know?

Given that I've acked this and it depends on the MFD changes I'd have
expected Lee to apply it.  If nothing else happens I can apply it after
the next merge window, otherwise either Lee needs to send me a pull
request for the MFD change so I've got the dependency or he needs to
apply this.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

[Steve Twiss]

From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>

Regulator support for the DA9061 is added into the DA9062 regulator driver.
 
The regulators for DA9061 differ from those of DA9062.
A new DA9061 enumeration list for the LDOs and Bucks supported by this
device is added. Regulator information added: the old regulator
information for DA9062 is renamed from local_regulator_info[] to
local_da9062_regulator_info[] and a new array is added to support
local_da9061_regulator_info[].

The probe() function switches on the da9062_compatible_types enumeration
and configures the correct da9062_regulator_info array and number of
regulator entries.

Kconfig is updated to reflect support for DA9061 and DA9062 regulators.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>

---
Hi,

This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
against x86_64.

The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
acceptance, could you please let me know?

Regards,
Steve


This patch applies against linux-next and v4.12-rc2

v6 -> v7
 - NO CODE CHANGE
 - Compile tested ARCH=x86_64

v5 -> v6
 - Rebased from v4.9 to v4.11-rc3
 - Modify Copyright to match Dialog latest legal statement

v4 -> v5
 - Rebased from v4.8 to v4.9
 - NO CODE CHANGE

v3 -> v4
 - NO CODE CHANGE
 - Patch renamed from [PATCH V3 6/9] to [PATCH V4 5/8]

v2 -> v3
 - NO CODE CHANGE
 - Patch renamed from [PATCH V2 06/10] to [PATCH V3 6/9]
 - Added Ack from Mark Brown

v1 -> v2
 - Patch renamed from [PATCH V1 02/10] to [PATCH V2 06/10] -- these
   changes were made to fix checkpatch warnings caused by the patch
   set dependency order
 - Updated header to use DA9061 and DA9062

Hi,

I have updated copyright header slightly to match Dialog's legal
expectation, but there are no code changes for this version PATCH V7.

As previously:

These changes depend on a header file provided as part of an earlier
patch [V7,4/7] mfd: da9061: MFD core support from this set. The regulator
probe() switches on the chip_type which uses enum da9062_compatible_types
in core.h from this patch.

Regards,
Steve Twiss, Dialog Semiconductor


 drivers/regulator/Kconfig            |   4 +-
 drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c | 303 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
index 48db87d..9d2222e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
@@ -214,11 +214,11 @@ config REGULATOR_DA9055
 	  will be called da9055-regulator.
 
 config REGULATOR_DA9062
-	tristate "Dialog Semiconductor DA9062 regulators"
+	tristate "Dialog Semiconductor DA9061/62 regulators"
 	depends on MFD_DA9062
 	help
 	  Say y here to support the BUCKs and LDOs regulators found on
-	  DA9062 PMICs.
+	  DA9061 and DA9062 PMICs.
 
 	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
 	  will be called da9062-regulator.
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
index 0638c8b..34a70d9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /*
- * da9062-regulator.c - REGULATOR device driver for DA9062
- * Copyright (C) 2015  Dialog Semiconductor Ltd.
+ * Regulator device driver for DA9061 and DA9062.
+ * Copyright (C) 2015-2017  Dialog Semiconductor
  *
  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
@@ -28,6 +28,17 @@
 
 /* Regulator IDs */
 enum {
+	DA9061_ID_BUCK1,
+	DA9061_ID_BUCK2,
+	DA9061_ID_BUCK3,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO1,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO2,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO3,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO4,
+	DA9061_MAX_REGULATORS,
+};
+
+enum {
 	DA9062_ID_BUCK1,
 	DA9062_ID_BUCK2,
 	DA9062_ID_BUCK3,
@@ -88,15 +99,21 @@ enum {
 
 /* Regulator operations */
 
-/* Current limits array (in uA) BUCK1 and BUCK3.
-   Entry indexes corresponds to register values. */
+/* Current limits array (in uA)
+ * - DA9061_ID_[BUCK1|BUCK3]
+ * - DA9062_ID_[BUCK1|BUCK2|BUCK4]
+ * Entry indexes corresponds to register values.
+ */
 static const int da9062_buck_a_limits[] = {
 	 500000,  600000,  700000,  800000,  900000, 1000000, 1100000, 1200000,
 	1300000, 1400000, 1500000, 1600000, 1700000, 1800000, 1900000, 2000000
 };
 
-/* Current limits array (in uA) for BUCK2.
-   Entry indexes corresponds to register values. */
+/* Current limits array (in uA)
+ * - DA9061_ID_BUCK2
+ * - DA9062_ID_BUCK3
+ * Entry indexes corresponds to register values.
+ */
 static const int da9062_buck_b_limits[] = {
 	1500000, 1600000, 1700000, 1800000, 1900000, 2000000, 2100000, 2200000,
 	2300000, 2400000, 2500000, 2600000, 2700000, 2800000, 2900000, 3000000
@@ -405,8 +422,254 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	.set_suspend_mode	= da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode,
 };
 
-/* Regulator information */
-static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_regulator_info[] = {
+/* DA9061 Regulator information */
+static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK1,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 BUCK1",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("buck1"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_buck_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (300) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (10) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((1570) - (300))/(10) + 1,
+		.current_limits = da9062_buck_a_limits,
+		.n_current_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_buck_a_limits),
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_BUCK1_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_BUCK1_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK1_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VBUCK1_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK1_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK1_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK1_B,
+		.mode = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK1_CFG,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_MODE_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_MODE_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK1_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VBUCK1_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.ilimit = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK_ILIM_C,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK2,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 BUCK2",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("buck2"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_buck_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (800) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (20) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3340) - (800))/(20) + 1,
+		.current_limits = da9062_buck_b_limits,
+		.n_current_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_buck_b_limits),
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_BUCK3_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_BUCK3_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK3_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VBUCK3_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK3_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK3_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK3_B,
+		.mode = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK3_CFG,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_MODE_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_MODE_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK3_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VBUCK3_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.ilimit = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK_ILIM_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK3,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 BUCK3",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("buck3"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_buck_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (530) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (10) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((1800) - (530))/(10) + 1,
+		.current_limits = da9062_buck_a_limits,
+		.n_current_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_buck_a_limits),
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_BUCK4_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_BUCK4_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK4_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VBUCK4_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK4_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK4_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK4_B,
+		.mode = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK4_CFG,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_MODE_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_MODE_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK4_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VBUCK4_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.ilimit = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK_ILIM_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO1,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO1",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo1"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO1_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO1_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO1_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO1_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO1_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO1_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO1_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO2,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO2",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo2"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (600))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO2_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO2_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO2_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO2_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO2_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO2_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO2_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO3,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO3",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo3"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO3_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO3_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO3_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO3_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO3_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO3_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO3_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO4,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO4",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo4"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO4_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO4_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO4_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO4_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO4_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO4_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO4_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+};
+
+/* DA9062 Regulator information */
+static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
 	{
 		.desc.id = DA9062_ID_BUCK1,
 		.desc.name = "DA9062 BUCK1",
@@ -727,17 +990,33 @@ static int da9062_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct da9062_regulators *regulators;
 	struct da9062_regulator *regl;
 	struct regulator_config config = { };
+	const struct da9062_regulator_info *rinfo;
 	int irq, n, ret;
 	size_t size;
+	int max_regulators;
+
+	switch (chip->chip_type) {
+	case COMPAT_TYPE_DA9061:
+		max_regulators = DA9061_MAX_REGULATORS;
+		rinfo = local_da9061_regulator_info;
+		break;
+	case COMPAT_TYPE_DA9062:
+		max_regulators = DA9062_MAX_REGULATORS;
+		rinfo = local_da9062_regulator_info;
+		break;
+	default:
+		dev_err(chip->dev, "Unrecognised chip type\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	/* Allocate memory required by usable regulators */
 	size = sizeof(struct da9062_regulators) +
-		DA9062_MAX_REGULATORS * sizeof(struct da9062_regulator);
+		max_regulators * sizeof(struct da9062_regulator);
 	regulators = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!regulators)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	regulators->n_regulators = DA9062_MAX_REGULATORS;
+	regulators->n_regulators = max_regulators;
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, regulators);
 
 	n = 0;
@@ -745,7 +1024,7 @@ static int da9062_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		/* Initialise regulator structure */
 		regl = &regulators->regulator[n];
 		regl->hw = chip;
-		regl->info = &local_regulator_info[n];
+		regl->info = &rinfo[n];
 		regl->desc = regl->info->desc;
 		regl->desc.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
 		regl->desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
@@ -836,6 +1115,6 @@ static void __exit da9062_regulator_cleanup(void)
 
 /* Module information */
 MODULE_AUTHOR("S Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("REGULATOR device driver for Dialog DA9062");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("REGULATOR device driver for Dialog DA9062 and DA9061");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_ALIAS("platform:da9062-regulators");
-- 
end-of-patch for RESEND PATCH V7