linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall
@ 2022-09-09  5:53 Wang Yufen
  2022-09-09  5:53 ` [-next v2 2/2] bpftool: Update doc (add auto_attach to prog load) Wang Yufen
  2022-09-09 11:38 ` [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall Quentin Monnet
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wang Yufen @ 2022-09-09  5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: quentin, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs,
	john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, davem, kuba, hawk,
	nathan, ndesaulniers, trix
  Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, netdev, llvm

Add auto_attach optional to support one-step load-attach-pin_link.

For example,
   $ bpftool prog loadall test.o /sys/fs/bpf/test auto_attach

   $ bpftool link
   26: tracing  name test1  tag f0da7d0058c00236  gpl
   	loaded_at 2022-09-09T21:39:49+0800  uid 0
   	xlated 88B  jited 55B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 3
   	btf_id 55
   28: kprobe  name test3  tag 002ef1bef0723833  gpl
   	loaded_at 2022-09-09T21:39:49+0800  uid 0
   	xlated 88B  jited 56B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 3
   	btf_id 55
   57: tracepoint  name oncpu  tag 7aa55dfbdcb78941  gpl
   	loaded_at 2022-09-09T21:41:32+0800  uid 0
   	xlated 456B  jited 265B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 17,13,14,15
   	btf_id 82

   $ bpftool link
   1: tracing  prog 26
   	prog_type tracing  attach_type trace_fentry
   3: perf_event  prog 28
   10: perf_event  prog 57

The auto_attach optional can support tracepoints, k(ret)probes,
u(ret)probes.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
---
v2 -> v3: switch to extend prog load command instead of extend perf
v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220824033837.458197-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com/
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220816151725.153343-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com/
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index c81362a..853a73e 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -1453,6 +1453,68 @@ static int do_run(int argc, char **argv)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int
+do_prog_attach_pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
+{
+	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+	int err;
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach(prog);
+	err = libbpf_get_error(link);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = bpf_link__pin(link, path);
+	if (err) {
+		bpf_link__destroy(link);
+		return err;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int pathname_concat(const char *path, const char *name, char *buf)
+{
+	int len;
+
+	len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path, name);
+	if (len < 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+		return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+do_obj_attach_pin_programs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
+{
+	struct bpf_program *prog;
+	char buf[PATH_MAX];
+	int err;
+
+	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
+		err = pathname_concat(path, bpf_program__name(prog), buf);
+		if (err)
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
+
+		err = do_prog_attach_pin(prog, buf);
+		if (err)
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_unpin_programs:
+	while ((prog = bpf_object__prev_program(obj, prog))) {
+		if (pathname_concat(path, bpf_program__name(prog), buf))
+			continue;
+
+		bpf_program__unpin(prog, buf);
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
 {
 	enum bpf_prog_type common_prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC;
@@ -1464,6 +1526,7 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
 	struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
 	unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
 	const char *pinmaps = NULL;
+	bool auto_attach = false;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	const char *pinfile;
@@ -1583,6 +1646,9 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
 				goto err_free_reuse_maps;
 
 			pinmaps = GET_ARG();
+		} else if (is_prefix(*argv, "auto_attach")) {
+			auto_attach = true;
+			NEXT_ARG();
 		} else {
 			p_err("expected no more arguments, 'type', 'map' or 'dev', got: '%s'?",
 			      *argv);
@@ -1692,14 +1758,20 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
 			goto err_close_obj;
 		}
 
-		err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
+		if (auto_attach)
+			err = do_prog_attach_pin(prog, pinfile);
+		else
+			err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
 		if (err) {
 			p_err("failed to pin program %s",
 			      bpf_program__section_name(prog));
 			goto err_close_obj;
 		}
 	} else {
-		err = bpf_object__pin_programs(obj, pinfile);
+		if (auto_attach)
+			err = do_obj_attach_pin_programs(obj, pinfile);
+		else
+			err = bpf_object__pin_programs(obj, pinfile);
 		if (err) {
 			p_err("failed to pin all programs");
 			goto err_close_obj;
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [-next v2 2/2] bpftool: Update doc (add auto_attach to prog load)
  2022-09-09  5:53 [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall Wang Yufen
@ 2022-09-09  5:53 ` Wang Yufen
  2022-09-09  6:07   ` wangyufen
  2022-09-09 11:38 ` [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall Quentin Monnet
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wang Yufen @ 2022-09-09  5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: quentin, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs,
	john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, davem, kuba, hawk,
	nathan, ndesaulniers, trix
  Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, netdev, llvm

Add auto_attach optional to prog load|loadall for supporting
one-step load-attach-pin_link.

Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
index eb1b2a2..c640ad3 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ PROG COMMANDS
 |	**bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual** | **linum**}]
 |	**bpftool** **prog dump jited**  *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **linum**}]
 |	**bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
-|	**bpftool** **prog** { **load** | **loadall** } *OBJ* *PATH* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*] [**pinmaps** *MAP_DIR*]
+|	**bpftool** **prog** { **load** | **loadall** } *OBJ* *PATH* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] \
+|               [**dev** *NAME*] [**pinmaps** *MAP_DIR*] [**auto_attach**]
 |	**bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
 |	**bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
 |	**bpftool** **prog tracelog**
@@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ DESCRIPTION
 		  contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
 		  extensions of *bpffs*.
 
-	**bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *PATH* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*] [**pinmaps** *MAP_DIR*]
+	**bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *PATH* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*] [**pinmaps** *MAP_DIR*] [**auto_attach**]
 		  Load bpf program(s) from binary *OBJ* and pin as *PATH*.
 		  **bpftool prog load** pins only the first program from the
 		  *OBJ* as *PATH*. **bpftool prog loadall** pins all programs
@@ -149,6 +150,8 @@ DESCRIPTION
 		  given networking device (offload).
 		  Optional **pinmaps** argument can be provided to pin all
 		  maps under *MAP_DIR* directory.
+		  If **auto_attach** is specified program will be attached
+		  before pin.
 
 		  Note: *PATH* must be located in *bpffs* mount. It must not
 		  contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [-next v2 2/2] bpftool: Update doc (add auto_attach to prog load)
  2022-09-09  5:53 ` [-next v2 2/2] bpftool: Update doc (add auto_attach to prog load) Wang Yufen
@ 2022-09-09  6:07   ` wangyufen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: wangyufen @ 2022-09-09  6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: quentin, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs,
	john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, davem, kuba, hawk,
	nathan, ndesaulniers, trix
  Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, netdev, llvm

Ignore, will resend with 'bpf-next'

在 2022/9/9 13:53, Wang Yufen 写道:
> Add auto_attach optional to prog load|loadall for supporting
> one-step load-attach-pin_link.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
> ---
>   tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 7 +++++--
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> index eb1b2a2..c640ad3 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ PROG COMMANDS
>   |	**bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual** | **linum**}]
>   |	**bpftool** **prog dump jited**  *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **linum**}]
>   |	**bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> -|	**bpftool** **prog** { **load** | **loadall** } *OBJ* *PATH* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*] [**pinmaps** *MAP_DIR*]
> +|	**bpftool** **prog** { **load** | **loadall** } *OBJ* *PATH* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] \
> +|               [**dev** *NAME*] [**pinmaps** *MAP_DIR*] [**auto_attach**]
>   |	**bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>   |	**bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>   |	**bpftool** **prog tracelog**
> @@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ DESCRIPTION
>   		  contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
>   		  extensions of *bpffs*.
>   
> -	**bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *PATH* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*] [**pinmaps** *MAP_DIR*]
> +	**bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *PATH* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*] [**pinmaps** *MAP_DIR*] [**auto_attach**]
>   		  Load bpf program(s) from binary *OBJ* and pin as *PATH*.
>   		  **bpftool prog load** pins only the first program from the
>   		  *OBJ* as *PATH*. **bpftool prog loadall** pins all programs
> @@ -149,6 +150,8 @@ DESCRIPTION
>   		  given networking device (offload).
>   		  Optional **pinmaps** argument can be provided to pin all
>   		  maps under *MAP_DIR* directory.
> +		  If **auto_attach** is specified program will be attached
> +		  before pin.
>   
>   		  Note: *PATH* must be located in *bpffs* mount. It must not
>   		  contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall
  2022-09-09  5:53 [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall Wang Yufen
  2022-09-09  5:53 ` [-next v2 2/2] bpftool: Update doc (add auto_attach to prog load) Wang Yufen
@ 2022-09-09 11:38 ` Quentin Monnet
  2022-09-13  2:40   ` wangyufen
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2022-09-09 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wang Yufen, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs,
	john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, davem, kuba, hawk,
	nathan, ndesaulniers, trix
  Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, netdev, llvm

On 09/09/2022 06:53, Wang Yufen wrote:
> Add auto_attach optional to support one-step load-attach-pin_link.
> 
> For example,
>    $ bpftool prog loadall test.o /sys/fs/bpf/test auto_attach
> 
>    $ bpftool link
>    26: tracing  name test1  tag f0da7d0058c00236  gpl
>    	loaded_at 2022-09-09T21:39:49+0800  uid 0
>    	xlated 88B  jited 55B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 3
>    	btf_id 55
>    28: kprobe  name test3  tag 002ef1bef0723833  gpl
>    	loaded_at 2022-09-09T21:39:49+0800  uid 0
>    	xlated 88B  jited 56B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 3
>    	btf_id 55
>    57: tracepoint  name oncpu  tag 7aa55dfbdcb78941  gpl
>    	loaded_at 2022-09-09T21:41:32+0800  uid 0
>    	xlated 456B  jited 265B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 17,13,14,15
>    	btf_id 82
> 
>    $ bpftool link
>    1: tracing  prog 26
>    	prog_type tracing  attach_type trace_fentry
>    3: perf_event  prog 28
>    10: perf_event  prog 57
> 
> The auto_attach optional can support tracepoints, k(ret)probes,
> u(ret)probes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>

Thanks, looks better! I just have some minor comments, please see inline
below.

> ---
> v2 -> v3: switch to extend prog load command instead of extend perf
> v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220824033837.458197-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com/
> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220816151725.153343-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com/
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> index c81362a..853a73e 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> @@ -1453,6 +1453,68 @@ static int do_run(int argc, char **argv)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +do_prog_attach_pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)

Can we rename this function please? The pattern "do_...()" looks like
one of the names for the functions we use for the subcommands via the
struct cmd. Maybe auto_attach_program()?

> +{
> +	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;

Nit: No need to initialise link

> +	int err;
> +
> +	link = bpf_program__attach(prog);
> +	err = libbpf_get_error(link);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	err = bpf_link__pin(link, path);
> +	if (err) {
> +		bpf_link__destroy(link);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pathname_concat(const char *path, const char *name, char *buf)
> +{
> +	int len;
> +
> +	len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path, name);
> +	if (len < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	else if (len >= PATH_MAX)

Nit: "else" not necessary, you returned if len < 0.

> +		return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +do_obj_attach_pin_programs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)

Same, can we rename this function please?

> +{
> +	struct bpf_program *prog;
> +	char buf[PATH_MAX];
> +	int err;
> +
> +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> +		err = pathname_concat(path, bpf_program__name(prog), buf);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> +
> +		err = do_prog_attach_pin(prog, buf);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_unpin_programs:
> +	while ((prog = bpf_object__prev_program(obj, prog))) {
> +		if (pathname_concat(path, bpf_program__name(prog), buf))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		bpf_program__unpin(prog, buf);
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>  {
>  	enum bpf_prog_type common_prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC;
> @@ -1464,6 +1526,7 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>  	struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
>  	unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
>  	const char *pinmaps = NULL;
> +	bool auto_attach = false;
>  	struct bpf_object *obj;
>  	struct bpf_map *map;
>  	const char *pinfile;
> @@ -1583,6 +1646,9 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>  				goto err_free_reuse_maps;
>  
>  			pinmaps = GET_ARG();
> +		} else if (is_prefix(*argv, "auto_attach")) {
> +			auto_attach = true;
> +			NEXT_ARG();
>  		} else {
>  			p_err("expected no more arguments, 'type', 'map' or 'dev', got: '%s'?",
>  			      *argv);
> @@ -1692,14 +1758,20 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>  			goto err_close_obj;
>  		}
>  
> -		err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
> +		if (auto_attach)
> +			err = do_prog_attach_pin(prog, pinfile);
> +		else
> +			err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
>  		if (err) {
>  			p_err("failed to pin program %s",
>  			      bpf_program__section_name(prog));
>  			goto err_close_obj;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -		err = bpf_object__pin_programs(obj, pinfile);
> +		if (auto_attach)
> +			err = do_obj_attach_pin_programs(obj, pinfile);
> +		else
> +			err = bpf_object__pin_programs(obj, pinfile);
>  		if (err) {
>  			p_err("failed to pin all programs");
>  			goto err_close_obj;

Please update the usage string in do_help() at the end of the file.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall
  2022-09-09 11:38 ` [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall Quentin Monnet
@ 2022-09-13  2:40   ` wangyufen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: wangyufen @ 2022-09-13  2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Quentin Monnet, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs,
	john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, davem, kuba, hawk,
	nathan, ndesaulniers, trix
  Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, netdev, llvm


在 2022/9/9 19:38, Quentin Monnet 写道:
> On 09/09/2022 06:53, Wang Yufen wrote:
>> Add auto_attach optional to support one-step load-attach-pin_link.
>>
>> For example,
>>     $ bpftool prog loadall test.o /sys/fs/bpf/test auto_attach
>>
>>     $ bpftool link
>>     26: tracing  name test1  tag f0da7d0058c00236  gpl
>>     	loaded_at 2022-09-09T21:39:49+0800  uid 0
>>     	xlated 88B  jited 55B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 3
>>     	btf_id 55
>>     28: kprobe  name test3  tag 002ef1bef0723833  gpl
>>     	loaded_at 2022-09-09T21:39:49+0800  uid 0
>>     	xlated 88B  jited 56B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 3
>>     	btf_id 55
>>     57: tracepoint  name oncpu  tag 7aa55dfbdcb78941  gpl
>>     	loaded_at 2022-09-09T21:41:32+0800  uid 0
>>     	xlated 456B  jited 265B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 17,13,14,15
>>     	btf_id 82
>>
>>     $ bpftool link
>>     1: tracing  prog 26
>>     	prog_type tracing  attach_type trace_fentry
>>     3: perf_event  prog 28
>>     10: perf_event  prog 57
>>
>> The auto_attach optional can support tracepoints, k(ret)probes,
>> u(ret)probes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
> Thanks, looks better! I just have some minor comments, please see inline
> below.
>
>> ---
>> v2 -> v3: switch to extend prog load command instead of extend perf
>> v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220824033837.458197-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com/
>> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220816151725.153343-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com/
>>   tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>> index c81362a..853a73e 100644
>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>> @@ -1453,6 +1453,68 @@ static int do_run(int argc, char **argv)
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int
>> +do_prog_attach_pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
> Can we rename this function please? The pattern "do_...()" looks like
> one of the names for the functions we use for the subcommands via the
> struct cmd. Maybe auto_attach_program()?
>
>> +{
>> +	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
> Nit: No need to initialise link
>
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	link = bpf_program__attach(prog);
>> +	err = libbpf_get_error(link);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		return err;
>> +
>> +	err = bpf_link__pin(link, path);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		bpf_link__destroy(link);
>> +		return err;
>> +	}
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pathname_concat(const char *path, const char *name, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	int len;
>> +
>> +	len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path, name);
>> +	if (len < 0)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> Nit: "else" not necessary, you returned if len < 0.
>
>> +		return -ENAMETOOLONG;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +do_obj_attach_pin_programs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
> Same, can we rename this function please?
>
>> +{
>> +	struct bpf_program *prog;
>> +	char buf[PATH_MAX];
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
>> +		err = pathname_concat(path, bpf_program__name(prog), buf);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
>> +
>> +		err = do_prog_attach_pin(prog, buf);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_unpin_programs:
>> +	while ((prog = bpf_object__prev_program(obj, prog))) {
>> +		if (pathname_concat(path, bpf_program__name(prog), buf))
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		bpf_program__unpin(prog, buf);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return err;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>>   {
>>   	enum bpf_prog_type common_prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC;
>> @@ -1464,6 +1526,7 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>>   	struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
>>   	unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
>>   	const char *pinmaps = NULL;
>> +	bool auto_attach = false;
>>   	struct bpf_object *obj;
>>   	struct bpf_map *map;
>>   	const char *pinfile;
>> @@ -1583,6 +1646,9 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>>   				goto err_free_reuse_maps;
>>   
>>   			pinmaps = GET_ARG();
>> +		} else if (is_prefix(*argv, "auto_attach")) {
>> +			auto_attach = true;
>> +			NEXT_ARG();
>>   		} else {
>>   			p_err("expected no more arguments, 'type', 'map' or 'dev', got: '%s'?",
>>   			      *argv);
>> @@ -1692,14 +1758,20 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>>   			goto err_close_obj;
>>   		}
>>   
>> -		err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
>> +		if (auto_attach)
>> +			err = do_prog_attach_pin(prog, pinfile);
>> +		else
>> +			err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
>>   		if (err) {
>>   			p_err("failed to pin program %s",
>>   			      bpf_program__section_name(prog));
>>   			goto err_close_obj;
>>   		}
>>   	} else {
>> -		err = bpf_object__pin_programs(obj, pinfile);
>> +		if (auto_attach)
>> +			err = do_obj_attach_pin_programs(obj, pinfile);
>> +		else
>> +			err = bpf_object__pin_programs(obj, pinfile);
>>   		if (err) {
>>   			p_err("failed to pin all programs");
>>   			goto err_close_obj;
> Please update the usage string in do_help() at the end of the file.

Thanks for your comments.
All will do in v4.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-13  2:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-09  5:53 [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall Wang Yufen
2022-09-09  5:53 ` [-next v2 2/2] bpftool: Update doc (add auto_attach to prog load) Wang Yufen
2022-09-09  6:07   ` wangyufen
2022-09-09 11:38 ` [bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Add auto_attach for bpf prog load|loadall Quentin Monnet
2022-09-13  2:40   ` wangyufen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).