linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Pull request for 4.9 for IPMI
@ 2016-10-21 14:02 Corey Minyard
  2016-10-21 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2016-10-21 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds, openipmi-developer, linux-kernel

The following changes since commit 6f33d6458e35d6ba53c2635ee4b8a3177cbd912d:

   Merge tag 'pm-4.9-rc2' of 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm 
(2016-10-20 15:32:51 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

   git://git.code.sf.net/p/openipmi/linux-ipmi tags/for-linus-4.9

for you to fetch changes up to 409de6a3676f071577e584d8c30b398409138a13:

   ipmi/bt-bmc: remove redundant return value check of 
platform_get_resource() (2016-10-20 20:27:55 -0500)

----------------------------------------------------------------
A small bug fix and a new driver for acting as an IPMI device.

I was on vacation during the merge window (a long vacation)
but this is a bug fix that should go in and a new driver that shouldn't
hurt anything.

This has been in linux-next for a month or so.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Alistair Popple (1):
       ipmi: add an Aspeed BT IPMI BMC driver

Cédric Le Goater (1):
       ipmi/bt-bmc: add a dependency on ARCH_ASPEED

Joel Stanley (1):
       ipmi: Fix ioremap error handling in bt-bmc

Wei Yongjun (1):
       ipmi/bt-bmc: remove redundant return value check of 
platform_get_resource()

Xie XiuQi (1):
       ipmi: fix crash on reading version from proc after unregisted bmc

  .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-bt-bmc.txt        |  23 +
  .../bindings/{ipmi.txt => ipmi/ipmi-smic.txt}      |   0
  drivers/Makefile                                   |   2 +-
  drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig                          |   8 +
  drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile                         |   1 +
  drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c                         | 505 
+++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c                |   7 +-
  include/uapi/linux/Kbuild                          |   1 +
  include/uapi/linux/bt-bmc.h                        |  18 +
  9 files changed, 560 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-bt-bmc.txt
  rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{ipmi.txt => 
ipmi/ipmi-smic.txt} (100%)
  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c
  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/bt-bmc.h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Pull request for 4.9 for IPMI
  2016-10-21 14:02 Pull request for 4.9 for IPMI Corey Minyard
@ 2016-10-21 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
  2016-10-21 17:54   ` Corey Minyard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2016-10-21 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Corey Minyard; +Cc: openipmi-developer, linux-kernel

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> wrote:
>
> This has been in linux-next for a month or so.

Clearly not. It was committed yesterday.

What the hell is wrong with people? If you had it in linux-next and it
was tested, why did you then send me something else?

Pulled and then immediately unpulled again, because the "this was
ready but I didn't send it to you because I was on vacation" was a
fine explanation, but then when I actually look at it I notice that it
wasn't actually true.

                      Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Pull request for 4.9 for IPMI
  2016-10-21 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2016-10-21 17:54   ` Corey Minyard
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2016-10-21 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: openipmi-developer, linux-kernel

On 10/21/2016 12:48 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> wrote:
>> This has been in linux-next for a month or so.
> Clearly not. It was committed yesterday.
>
> What the hell is wrong with people? If you had it in linux-next and it
> was tested, why did you then send me something else?

I rebased it, but that was it.  I'll resend the exact version that was 
in linux-next.

-corey

> Pulled and then immediately unpulled again, because the "this was
> ready but I didn't send it to you because I was on vacation" was a
> fine explanation, but then when I actually look at it I notice that it
> wasn't actually true.
>
>                        Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-21 17:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-21 14:02 Pull request for 4.9 for IPMI Corey Minyard
2016-10-21 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-21 17:54   ` Corey Minyard

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).