[PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.1-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.1.1-rc1

Ferry Toth <ftoth@exalondelft.nl>
    usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on ulpi_read_id timeout

Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@haag-streit.com>
    KEYS: encrypted: fix key instantiation with user-provided data

Paulo Alcantara <pc@cjr.nz>
    cifs: fix oops during encryption

Shruthi Sanil <shruthi.sanil@intel.com>
    usb: dwc3: pci: Update PCIe device ID for USB3 controller on CPU sub-system for Raptor Lake

Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
    usb: typec: ucsi: Resume in separate work

Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
    igb: Initialize mailbox message for VF reset

Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
    staging: r8188eu: fix led register settings

Reka Norman <rekanorman@chromium.org>
    xhci: Apply XHCI_RESET_TO_DEFAULT quirk to ADL-N

Andy Chi <andy.chi@canonical.com>
    ALSA: hda/realtek: fix mute/micmute LEDs for a HP ProBook

Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
    USB: serial: f81534: fix division by zero on line-speed change

Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
    USB: serial: f81232: fix division by zero on line-speed change

Bruno Thomsen <bruno.thomsen@gmail.com>
    USB: serial: cp210x: add Kamstrup RF sniffer PIDs

Duke Xin <duke_xinanwen@163.com>
    USB: serial: option: add Quectel EM05-G modem

Szymon Heidrich <szymon.heidrich@gmail.com>
    usb: gadget: uvc: Prevent buffer overflow in setup handler

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    udf: Fix extending file within last block

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    udf: Do not bother looking for prealloc extents if i_lenExtents matches i_size

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    udf: Fix preallocation discarding at indirect extent boundary

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    udf: Discard preallocation before extending file with a hole

Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
    irqchip/ls-extirq: Fix endianness detection

John Thomson <git@johnthomson.fastmail.com.au>
    mips: ralink: mt7621: do not use kzalloc too early

John Thomson <git@johnthomson.fastmail.com.au>
    mips: ralink: mt7621: soc queries and tests as functions

John Thomson <git@johnthomson.fastmail.com.au>
    mips: ralink: mt7621: define MT7621_SYSC_BASE with __iomem

John Thomson <git@johnthomson.fastmail.com.au>
    PCI: mt7621: Add sentinel to quirks table

David Michael <fedora.dm0@gmail.com>
    libbpf: Fix uninitialized warning in btf_dump_dump_type_data

Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
    x86/vdso: Conditionally export __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave()


-------------

Diffstat:

 Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst |   3 +-
 Makefile                                          |   4 +-
 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ralink/mt7621.h        |   4 +-
 arch/mips/ralink/mt7621.c                         |  97 ++++++++++-----
 arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S                    |   2 +
 drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c                   |   2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c         |   2 +-
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c              |   3 +-
 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_led.c            |  25 +---
 drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c                         |   2 +-
 drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-pci.c                       |   2 +-
 drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c               |   5 +-
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c                       |   4 +-
 drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c                       |   2 +
 drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c                       |  12 +-
 drivers/usb/serial/f81534.c                       |  12 +-
 drivers/usb/serial/option.c                       |   3 +
 drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c                     |  17 ++-
 drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.h                     |   1 +
 fs/cifs/cifsglob.h                                |  68 ++++++++++
 fs/cifs/cifsproto.h                               |   4 +-
 fs/cifs/misc.c                                    |   4 +-
 fs/cifs/smb2ops.c                                 | 143 ++++++++++------------
 fs/udf/inode.c                                    |  76 +++++-------
 fs/udf/truncate.c                                 |  48 +++-----
 security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c          |   6 +-
 sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c                     |   2 +
 tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c                          |   2 +-
 28 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 236 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 12/19/22 12:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 12/19/22 11:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 536 bytes --]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.2.0).

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 12/19/22 11:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Rudi Heitbaum]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi Greg,

6.1.1-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Intel Alder Lake x86_64 (nuc12 i7-1260P)
- SolidRun Cubox-i Dual/Quad - NXP iMX6 (Cubox-i4Pro)

In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 00:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.1.1-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 4478ff938eb5814bd2ae93b7e2d68c4fe54e9380
* git describe: v6.1-26-g4478ff938eb5
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1-26-g4478ff938eb5/

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1)

## Test result summary
total: 173959, pass: 152611, fail: 5743, skip: 15605, xfail: 0

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 146 passed, 5 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 48 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 39 total, 36 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 30 total, 28 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 38 total, 32 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 41 passed, 1 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)]

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221127):
mips: 52 configs -> no failure
arm: 100 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. Regression.

Note:
networking.service is failing on mips ci20 boards. Issue seen on v6.1 also.
Will report upstream after bisecting.


[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2420
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2427

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee]

Hi Greg,

On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 12:26, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
<sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

<snip>

>
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
> x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
> arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
> mips: Booted on ci20 board. Regression.
>
> Note:
> networking.service is failing on mips ci20 boards. Issue seen on v6.1 also.
> Will report upstream after bisecting.

This has already been fixed in mainline by:
ca637c0ece14 ("MIPS: DTS: CI20: fix reset line polarity of the
ethernet controller")

I have tested 6.1.1-rc1 with the above commit cherry-picked and it has
fixed the issue.


-- 
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 02:31:20PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 12:26, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
> <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> > > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> 
> <snip>
> 
> >
> > Boot test:
> > x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
> > x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
> > arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
> > mips: Booted on ci20 board. Regression.
> >
> > Note:
> > networking.service is failing on mips ci20 boards. Issue seen on v6.1 also.
> > Will report upstream after bisecting.
> 
> This has already been fixed in mainline by:
> ca637c0ece14 ("MIPS: DTS: CI20: fix reset line polarity of the
> ethernet controller")
> 
> I have tested 6.1.1-rc1 with the above commit cherry-picked and it has
> fixed the issue.

Thanks for letting me know, now queued up.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 500 pass: 498 fail: 2
Failed tests:
	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:net,default:zynq-zc702:rootfs
	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:zynq-zed:rootfs

The failure bisects to commit e013ba1e4e12 ("usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on
ulpi_read_id timeout") and is inherited from mainline. Reverting the offending
patch fixes the problem.

Guenter

---
# bad: [4478ff938eb5814bd2ae93b7e2d68c4fe54e9380] Linux 6.1.1-rc1
# good: [830b3c68c1fb1e9176028d02ef86f3cf76aa2476] Linux 6.1
git bisect start 'HEAD' 'v6.1'
# good: [38b8e682acfa37b80cb947cecc743431c72a6c1d] USB: serial: option: add Quectel EM05-G modem
git bisect good 38b8e682acfa37b80cb947cecc743431c72a6c1d
# good: [8baa56d13f1bef9c621bc967c66b789022e9614e] staging: r8188eu: fix led register settings
git bisect good 8baa56d13f1bef9c621bc967c66b789022e9614e
# good: [aaac7e5db89b4f46c871b9a5c188bfbe6ae21b83] usb: dwc3: pci: Update PCIe device ID for USB3 controller on CPU sub-system for Raptor Lake
git bisect good aaac7e5db89b4f46c871b9a5c188bfbe6ae21b83
# good: [acbd8d17388466ea19eb52c2239c2e9d34906381] KEYS: encrypted: fix key instantiation with user-provided data
git bisect good acbd8d17388466ea19eb52c2239c2e9d34906381
# bad: [e013ba1e4e12b523bff42f600d598ff65a69c27b] usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on ulpi_read_id timeout
git bisect bad e013ba1e4e12b523bff42f600d598ff65a69c27b
# first bad commit: [e013ba1e4e12b523bff42f600d598ff65a69c27b] usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on ulpi_read_id timeout

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:00:49AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 500 pass: 498 fail: 2
> Failed tests:
> 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:net,default:zynq-zc702:rootfs
> 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:zynq-zed:rootfs
> 
> The failure bisects to commit e013ba1e4e12 ("usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on
> ulpi_read_id timeout") and is inherited from mainline. Reverting the offending
> patch fixes the problem.

Odd, yet that same commit works just fine on 6.0 and 5.15 and 5.10?  I
hadn't had any reports of this being an issue on Linus's tree either,
did I miss those?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 04:10:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:00:49AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> > > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > 
> > Build results:
> > 	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
> > Qemu test results:
> > 	total: 500 pass: 498 fail: 2
> > Failed tests:
> > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:net,default:zynq-zc702:rootfs
> > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:zynq-zed:rootfs
> > 
> > The failure bisects to commit e013ba1e4e12 ("usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on
> > ulpi_read_id timeout") and is inherited from mainline. Reverting the offending
> > patch fixes the problem.
> 
> Odd, yet that same commit works just fine on 6.0 and 5.15 and 5.10?  I
> hadn't had any reports of this being an issue on Linus's tree either,
> did I miss those?
> 

I testbed has a bad hair day. The reports for the other branches are wrong.
I restarted the tests and expect them to fail there as well. Sorry for that.

You probably didn't see any reports on mainline because I didn't report
the issue there yet. There are so many failures in mainline that it is
a bit difficult to keep up. This would be a full-time job, and I just
don't have that much time, sorry.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Jiri Slaby]

On 20. 12. 22, 17:11, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> You probably didn't see any reports on mainline because I didn't report
> the issue there yet. There are so many failures in mainline that it is
> a bit difficult to keep up.

Just heads up, these are breakages in 6.1 known to me:

an io_uring 32bit test crashes the kernel:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/c80c1e3f-800b-dc49-f2f5-acc8ceb34d51@gmail.com/

Fixed in io_uring tree.


bind() of previously bound port no longer fails:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6b971a4e-c7d8-411e-1f92-fda29b5b2fb9@kernel.org/

No fix available and revert close to impossible.



And most important, mremap() is broken in 6.1, so mostly everything 
fails in some random way:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221216163227.24648-1-vbabka@suse.cz/T/#u

Fixed in -mm.

maybe it can help...

-- 
js
suse labs

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 07:34:04AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 20. 12. 22, 17:11, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > You probably didn't see any reports on mainline because I didn't report
> > the issue there yet. There are so many failures in mainline that it is
> > a bit difficult to keep up.
> 
> Just heads up, these are breakages in 6.1 known to me:
> 
> an io_uring 32bit test crashes the kernel:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/c80c1e3f-800b-dc49-f2f5-acc8ceb34d51@gmail.com/
> 
> Fixed in io_uring tree.
> 
> 
> bind() of previously bound port no longer fails:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6b971a4e-c7d8-411e-1f92-fda29b5b2fb9@kernel.org/
> 
> No fix available and revert close to impossible.
> 
> 
> 
> And most important, mremap() is broken in 6.1, so mostly everything fails in
> some random way:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221216163227.24648-1-vbabka@suse.cz/T/#u
> 
> Fixed in -mm.
> 
> maybe it can help...

Thanks for the list, I'll keep an eye out for these...

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 21.12.22 07:34, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 20. 12. 22, 17:11, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> You probably didn't see any reports on mainline because I didn't report
>> the issue there yet. There are so many failures in mainline that it is
>> a bit difficult to keep up.
> 
> Just heads up, these are breakages in 6.1 known to me:
> 
> an io_uring 32bit test crashes the kernel:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/c80c1e3f-800b-dc49-f2f5-acc8ceb34d51@gmail.com/
> 
> Fixed in io_uring tree.

Just BTW: afaics the fix is now in mainline as 990a4de57e44

> bind() of previously bound port no longer fails:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6b971a4e-c7d8-411e-1f92-fda29b5b2fb9@kernel.org/
> 
> No fix available and revert close to impossible.

Also just BTW: fix posted yesterday.

> And most important, mremap() is broken in 6.1, so mostly everything
> fails in some random way:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221216163227.24648-1-vbabka@suse.cz/T/#u
> 
> Fixed in -mm.

That one seems to fix an annoying issue many people might run into (at
least it looks like it to my untrained eyes), which is the reason why I
write this mail.

Andrew moved that fix from mm-hotfixes-unstable to mm-hotfixes-stable
yesterday and I assume he'll send it to Linus pretty soon now to ensure
it makes it into -rc1, so that the stable team can pick it up. It might
be a bad season to ask this, but that made me wonder:

Should that patch have progressed quicker? And if so: how to make that
happen when a similar situation arises in the future? Should somebody
(the developer of the patch? me?) kindly ask the maintainer in question
to sent the fix straight to Linus once it spend 1 or 2 days in next?

It's not the first time that I see something like this, that's why I'm
wondering if I should do something in such situations.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:11:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 04:10:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:00:49AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> > > > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Build results:
> > > 	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > 	total: 500 pass: 498 fail: 2
> > > Failed tests:
> > > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:net,default:zynq-zc702:rootfs
> > > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:zynq-zed:rootfs
> > > 
> > > The failure bisects to commit e013ba1e4e12 ("usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on
> > > ulpi_read_id timeout") and is inherited from mainline. Reverting the offending
> > > patch fixes the problem.
> > 
> > Odd, yet that same commit works just fine on 6.0 and 5.15 and 5.10?  I
> > hadn't had any reports of this being an issue on Linus's tree either,
> > did I miss those?
> > 
> 
> I testbed has a bad hair day. The reports for the other branches are wrong.
> I restarted the tests and expect them to fail there as well. Sorry for that.

No worries, I've deleted this patch from all branches now, thanks.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:22:39 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.1:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    130 tests:	130 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.1.1-rc1-g4478ff938eb5
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Allen Pais]

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>

Thanks.

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Slade Watkins]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 2:23 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi,
Compiled and tested on my x86_64 test systems, no errors or
regressions to report.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net>

Yours,
-- Slade

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Justin Forbes]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.

Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Thierry Reding]

On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:22:39 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.1:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    130 tests:	130 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.1.1-rc1-g4478ff938eb5
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Ronald Warsow]

Hi Greg

6.1.1-rc1

compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(Intel i5-11400, Fedora 37)

Thanks

Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>