linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	<rdunlap@infradead.org>, <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
	<songmuchun@bytedance.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<jpoimboe@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	<chang.seok.bae@intel.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	<jmattson@google.com>, <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
	<sandipan.das@amd.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	<james.morse@arm.com>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	<eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration feature flag
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:09:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8924a9e-d48d-d552-dce1-78d396372956@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166759201032.3281208.8545863740733338256.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu>

Hi Babu,

On 11/4/2022 1:00 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> Newer AMD processors support the new feature Bandwidth Monitoring Event
> Configuration (BMEC).
> 
> The feature support is identified via CPUID Fn8000_0020_EBX_x0 (ECX=0).
> Bits    Field Name    Description
> 3       EVT_CFG       Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration (BMEC)
> 
> Currently, the bandwidth monitoring events mbm_total_bytes and
> mbm_local_bytes are set to count all the total and local reads/writes
> respectively. With the introduction of slow memory, the two counters
> are not enough to count all the different types of memory events. With
> the feature BMEC, the users have the option to configure
> mbm_total_bytes and mbm_local_bytes to count the specific type of
> events.
> 
> Each BMEC event has a configuration MSR, QOS_EVT_CFG (0xc000_0400h +
> EventID) which contains one field for each bandwidth type that can be

Looking at later patches it seems that it is not really 0xc000_0400h +
EventID but instead "0xc000_0400h + index_based_on_EventID"? This may be
too much detail for this changelog so maybe these specifics can
be deferred and just refer to the "configuration MSR".

> used to configure the bandwidth event to track any combination of
> supported bandwidth types. The event will count requests from every
> bandwidth type bit that is set in the corresponding configuration
> register.
> 
> Following are the types of events supported:
> 
> ====    ========================================================
> Bits    Description
> ====    ========================================================
> 6       Dirty Victims from the QOS domain to all types of memory
> 5       Reads to slow memory in the non-local NUMA domain
> 4       Reads to slow memory in the local NUMA domain
> 3       Non-temporal writes to non-local NUMA domain
> 2       Non-temporal writes to local NUMA domain
> 1       Reads to memory in the non-local NUMA domain
> 0       Reads to memory in the local NUMA domain
> ====    ========================================================
> 
> By default, the mbm_total_bytes configuration is set to 0x7F to count
> all the event types and the mbm_local_bytes configuration is set to
> 0x15 to count all the local memory events.
> 
> Feature description is available in the specification, "AMD64
> Technology Platform Quality of Service Extensions, Revision: 1.03
> Publication
> 
> Link: https://www.amd.com/en/support/tech-docs/amd64-technology-platform-quality-service-extensions
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206537
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c   |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c    |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index d68b4c9c181d..6732ca0117be 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE	(11*32+17) /* "" Fill RSB on VM exit when EIBRS is enabled */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH		(11*32+18) /* "" Call depth tracking for RSB stuffing */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_SMBA		(11*32+19) /* Slow Memory Bandwidth Allocation */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_BMEC		(11*32+20) /* AMD Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration (BMEC) */

Surely a nitpick but it is strange that the two features introduced in this
series are described differently. Why does SMBA deserve the "AMD" prefix
but BMEC does not? I do not think the "(BMEC)" is necessary since
it is in X86_FEATURE_BMEC.
  
>  /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:1 (EAX), word 12 */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX_VNNI		(12*32+ 4) /* AVX VNNI instructions */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> index c881bcafba7d..4555f9596ccf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_dep cpuid_deps[] = {
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC,		X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_TOTAL,		X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_LOCAL,		X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
> +	{ X86_FEATURE_BMEC,			X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_AVX512_BF16,		X86_FEATURE_AVX512VL  },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_AVX512_FP16,		X86_FEATURE_AVX512BW  },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD,			X86_FEATURE_XSAVES    },
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> index 5a5f17ed69a2..67c4d24e06ef 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK,    CPUID_EDX, 11, 0x80000007, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_MBA,		CPUID_EBX,  6, 0x80000008, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_SMBA,		CPUID_EBX,  2, 0x80000020, 0 },
> +	{ X86_FEATURE_BMEC,		CPUID_EBX,  3, 0x80000020, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2,	CPUID_EAX,  0, 0x80000022, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2,	CPUID_EAX,  1, 0x80000022, 0 },
>  	{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
> 
> 

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-23  0:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-04 19:59 [PATCH v8 00/13] Support for AMD QoS new features Babu Moger
2022-11-04 19:59 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Slow Memory Bandwidth Allocation feature flag Babu Moger
2022-11-23 18:21   ` Yu, Fenghua
2022-11-23 23:09     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-04 20:00 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] x86/resctrl: Add a new resource type RDT_RESOURCE_SMBA Babu Moger
2022-11-23  0:04   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 15:13     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-04 20:00 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration feature flag Babu Moger
2022-11-23  0:09   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2022-11-23 15:16     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-23 18:17   ` Yu, Fenghua
2022-11-23 23:06     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-04 20:00 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] x86/resctrl: Include new features in command line options Babu Moger
2022-11-23 18:26   ` Yu, Fenghua
2022-11-23 23:10     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-04 20:00 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] x86/resctrl: Detect and configure Slow Memory Bandwidth Allocation Babu Moger
2022-11-23  0:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 15:17     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-30 18:43     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-30 20:07       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-30 20:40         ` Moger, Babu
2022-12-01  0:35           ` Reinette Chatre
2022-12-01 13:56             ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-04 20:00 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] x86/resctrl: Remove the init attribute for rdt_cpu_has() Babu Moger
2022-11-23  0:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 17:48     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-04 20:00 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] x86/resctrl: Introduce data structure to support monitor configuration Babu Moger
2022-11-23  0:14   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 18:23     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-23 19:05       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 21:46         ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-04 20:00 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to read mbm_total_bytes_config Babu Moger
2022-11-23  0:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 18:35     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-23 22:27       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 22:55         ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-04 20:01 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to read mbm_local_bytes_config Babu Moger
2022-11-04 20:01 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to write mbm_total_bytes_config Babu Moger
2022-11-07 10:21   ` Peter Newman
2022-11-07 18:50     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-07 19:00     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-22 23:43       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 21:44         ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-23 22:22           ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-28 16:01             ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-23  0:22   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 22:44     ` Moger, Babu
2022-12-07 17:20   ` James Morse
2022-12-07 17:24     ` James Morse
2022-12-08  0:02     ` Moger, Babu
2022-12-13 17:55       ` James Morse
2022-12-13 23:46         ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-04 20:01 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to write mbm_local_bytes_config Babu Moger
2022-11-04 20:01 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] x86/resctrl: Replace smp_call_function_many() with on_each_cpu_mask() Babu Moger
2022-11-04 20:01 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] Documentation/x86: Update resctrl.rst for new features Babu Moger
2022-11-23  0:26   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-23 23:02     ` Moger, Babu
2022-11-15 20:50 ` [PATCH v8 00/13] Support for AMD QoS " Moger, Babu
2022-11-15 21:07   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-11-15 21:34     ` Moger, Babu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d8924a9e-d48d-d552-dce1-78d396372956@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).