linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Suloev <ssuloev@orpaltech.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] spi: core: handle timeout error from transfer_one()
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:24:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dad0ea81-2dd6-ccc3-a0c9-cf20ff195b7f@orpaltech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403161824.GB11578@sirena.org.uk>

On 04/03/2018 07:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 07:00:55PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
>> On 04/03/2018 06:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 06:29:00PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
>>>> As long as sun4i/sun6i SPI drivers have overriden the default
>>>> "wait for completion" procedure then we need to properly
>>>> handle -ETIMEDOUT error from transfer_one().
>>> Why is this connected to those drivers specifically?
>> These 2 drivers have their own "waiting" code and not using the code from
>> SPI core.
> Does this not apply to any other driver - why is this something we only
> have to do when these drivers do it?  That's what's setting off alarm
> bells.

sun4i/sun6i drivers have let's say "smart" waiting while SPI core uses a 
fixed interval to wait.

I can't say for every SPI driver in kernel, that's outside of my area of 
expertise.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-03 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-03 15:28 [PATCH v2 0/6] spi: Add support for DMA transfers in sun4i SPI driver Sergey Suloev
2018-04-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] spi: core: handle timeout error from transfer_one() Sergey Suloev
2018-04-03 15:52   ` Mark Brown
2018-04-03 16:00     ` Sergey Suloev
2018-04-03 16:18       ` Mark Brown
2018-04-03 16:24         ` Sergey Suloev [this message]
2018-04-04  7:08           ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-04 10:42             ` Mark Brown
2018-04-04 19:19             ` Sergey Suloev
2018-04-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] spi: sun4i: restrict transfer length in PIO-mode Sergey Suloev
2018-04-04  7:10   ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] spi: sun4i: coding style/readability improvements Sergey Suloev
2018-04-04  7:13   ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] spi: sun4i: use completion provided by SPI core driver Sergey Suloev
2018-04-04  7:13   ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] spi: sun4i: introduce register set/unset helpers Sergey Suloev
2018-04-04  7:14   ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-03 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] spi: sun4i: add DMA transfers support Sergey Suloev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dad0ea81-2dd6-ccc3-a0c9-cf20ff195b7f@orpaltech.com \
    --to=ssuloev@orpaltech.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).