linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	<wcohen@redhat.com>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] perf jevents: add support for arch recommended events
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:22:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc3a2808-5c16-fc47-80a3-d12823ff6f2d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180102174814.GT25156@tassilo.jf.intel.com>

On 02/01/2018 17:48, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Can you describe how you autogenerate the JSONs? Do you have some internal
>> proprietary HW file format describing events, with files supplied from HW
>> designer, which you can just translate into a JSON? Would the files support
>> deferencing events to improve scalability?
>
> For Intel JSON is an official format, which is maintained for each CPU.
> It is automatically generated from an internal database
> https://download.01.org/perfmon/
>
> I have some python scripts to convert these Intel JSONs into the perf
> format (which has some additional headers, and is split into
> different categories, and add metrics).

OK, understood.

Unfortunately I could not see such a database being maintained for ARM 
implementors.

>
> They have some Intel specifics, so may not be useful for you.
>
> There's no support for dereference, each CPU gets its own unique file.

Right.

>
> But you could do the a merge simply with the attached script which merges
> two JSON files.

I assume that you're talking about simply merging the micro architecture 
and the platform specific event JSONS at build time.

If yes, this would not work for us:
- the microarchitecture JSON would contain definitions of all events, 
but there is no architectural method to check if they are implemented
- we need to deal with scenario of non-standard event implementations

But I could update the script to deal with this and add to the build 
(Jirka looked to be ok with the same in jevents, albeit a few caveats).

All the best,
John

>
> -Andi
>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-03 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-05 16:13 [RFC PATCH 0/5] perf events patches for improved ARM64 support John Garry
2017-12-05 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] perf jevents: add support for pmu events vendor subdirectory John Garry
2017-12-06 13:38   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-06 14:41     ` John Garry
2017-12-05 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] perf jevents: add support for arch recommended events John Garry
2017-12-05 17:27   ` Andi Kleen
2017-12-06  8:34     ` John Garry
2017-12-06 13:36   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-06 15:20     ` John Garry
2017-12-08 12:29       ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-08 15:42         ` John Garry
2017-12-09  7:31           ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-11 10:25             ` John Garry
2017-12-15 11:22             ` John Garry
2017-12-16 18:47               ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-02 12:07                 ` John Garry
2018-01-02 17:48                   ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 12:22                     ` John Garry [this message]
2017-12-21 19:39               ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-04 17:17                 ` John Garry
2018-01-08 14:08                   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-06 13:37   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-06 14:40     ` John Garry
2017-12-08 12:31       ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-08 15:38         ` John Garry
2017-12-09  7:26           ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-05 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] perf vendor events arm64: add armv8 recommended events JSON John Garry
2017-12-05 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] perf vendor events arm64: relocate thunderx2 JSON John Garry
2017-12-05 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] perf vendor events arm64: add HiSilicon hip08 JSON John Garry
2017-12-06 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] perf events patches for improved ARM64 support William Cohen
2017-12-06 17:35   ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc3a2808-5c16-fc47-80a3-d12823ff6f2d@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).