[PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.6-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.1.6-rc1

Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
    net: sched: disallow noqueue for qdisc classes

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    gcc: disable -Warray-bounds for gcc-11 too

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
    Revert "SUNRPC: Use RMW bitops in single-threaded hot paths"

Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
    selftests/vm/pkeys: Add a regression test for setting PKRU through ptrace

Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
    x86/fpu: Emulate XRSTOR's behavior if the xfeatures PKRU bit is not set

Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
    x86/fpu: Allow PKRU to be (once again) written by ptrace.

Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
    x86/fpu: Add a pkru argument to copy_uabi_to_xstate()

Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
    x86/fpu: Add a pkru argument to copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate().

Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
    x86/fpu: Take task_struct* in copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate()

Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
    parisc: Align parisc MADV_XXX constants with all other architectures


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                     |   4 +-
 arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h          |  29 +++---
 arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c              |  28 ++++++
 arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl      |   2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c                   |  19 ++--
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c                 |   2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c                 |   2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c                 |  52 ++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.h                 |   4 +-
 fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c                           |   7 +-
 fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c                            |   2 +-
 init/Kconfig                                 |   6 +-
 net/sched/sch_api.c                          |   5 +
 net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c            |   4 +-
 net/sunrpc/svc.c                             |   6 +-
 net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c                        |   2 +-
 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c                         |   8 +-
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c     |   2 +-
 tools/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h    |  12 +--
 tools/perf/bench/bench.h                     |  12 ---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h        |  12 +++
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 22 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Conor Dooley]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]

Hey Greg,

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:56:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.6-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Looks like not much in it that's of concern for RISC-V, but FWIW:
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Thanks,
Conor.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 1/12/23 06:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.6-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Kelsey Steele]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:56:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
 
No regressions found on WSL x86_64 or WSL arm64

Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.

Thank you.

Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[ogasawara takeshi]

Hi Greg

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.6-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

6.1.6-rc1 tested.

x86_64

build successfully completed
boot successfully completed

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen1(Intel i5-1130G7, arch linux)

Thanks

Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:56:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 500 pass: 500 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 536 bytes --]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:56:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.2.0).

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 1/12/23 5:56 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.6-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee]

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:56:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221127):
mips: 52 configs -> no failure
arm: 100 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2630
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2631
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2634

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:56:21 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.6-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.1:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    130 tests:	130 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.1.6-rc1-g5eedeabf82ee
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 19:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.6-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.1.6-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 5eedeabf82ee83045c63fd32b2473e1d61885204
* git describe: v6.1.5-11-g5eedeabf82ee
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.5-11-g5eedeabf82ee

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.4-160-g06bcfb15cd3b)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.4-160-g06bcfb15cd3b)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.4-160-g06bcfb15cd3b)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.4-160-g06bcfb15cd3b)

## Test result summary
total: 183886, pass: 153292, fail: 5185, skip: 25382, xfail: 27

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 148 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 51 total, 50 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 39 total, 36 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 30 total, 28 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 38 total, 32 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 15 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Allen Pais]

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.6-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>

Thanks.

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Rudi Heitbaum]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:56:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.6 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi Greg,

6.1.6-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6)
- Intel Alder Lake x86_64 (nuc12 i7-1260P)

In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/10] 6.1.6-rc1 review

[Ronald Warsow]

Hi Greg

6.1.6-rc1

compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(Intel i5-11400, Fedora 37)

Thanks

Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>