linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: slightly improve handle_irq
@ 2019-08-04  8:18 Heiner Kallweit
  2019-08-04  8:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/irq: improve definition of VECTOR_SHUTDOWN et al Heiner Kallweit
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2019-08-04  8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, H. Peter Anvin, x86
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

When checking something else I stumbled across this code.
This patch set simplifies it a little bit.

Heiner Kallweit (3):
  x86/irq: improve definition of VECTOR_SHUTDOWN et al
  x86/irq: factor out IS_ERR_OR_NULL check from platfom-specific
    handle_irq
  x86/irq: slightly improve do_IRQ

 arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 4 ++--
 arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h    | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c         | 7 ++++---
 arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c      | 7 +------
 arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c      | 6 +-----
 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/3] x86/irq: improve definition of VECTOR_SHUTDOWN et al
  2019-08-04  8:18 [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: slightly improve handle_irq Heiner Kallweit
@ 2019-08-04  8:19 ` Heiner Kallweit
  2019-08-04  8:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: factor out IS_ERR_OR_NULL check from platfom-specific handle_irq Heiner Kallweit
  2019-08-04  8:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq: slightly improve do_IRQ Heiner Kallweit
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2019-08-04  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, H. Peter Anvin, x86
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

These values are used with IS_ERR(), so it's more intuitive to define
them like a standard PTR_ERR() of a negative errno.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index cbd97e22d..4154bc5f6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ extern char irq_entries_start[];
 extern char spurious_entries_start[];
 
 #define VECTOR_UNUSED		NULL
-#define VECTOR_SHUTDOWN		((void *)~0UL)
-#define VECTOR_RETRIGGERED	((void *)~1UL)
+#define VECTOR_SHUTDOWN		((void *)-1L)
+#define VECTOR_RETRIGGERED	((void *)-2L)
 
 typedef struct irq_desc* vector_irq_t[NR_VECTORS];
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(vector_irq_t, vector_irq);
-- 
2.22.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: factor out IS_ERR_OR_NULL check from platfom-specific handle_irq
  2019-08-04  8:18 [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: slightly improve handle_irq Heiner Kallweit
  2019-08-04  8:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/irq: improve definition of VECTOR_SHUTDOWN et al Heiner Kallweit
@ 2019-08-04  8:21 ` Heiner Kallweit
  2019-08-19 10:41   ` Thomas Gleixner
  2019-08-04  8:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq: slightly improve do_IRQ Heiner Kallweit
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2019-08-04  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, H. Peter Anvin, x86
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

The code can be simplified a little by factoring out the IS_ERR_OR_NULL
check from the platform-specific handle_irq implementations.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c      | 5 +++--
 arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c   | 7 +------
 arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c   | 6 +-----
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
index 8f95686ec..a176f6165 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ extern __visible void smp_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern void (*x86_platform_ipi_callback)(void);
 extern void native_init_IRQ(void);
 
-extern bool handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern void handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 extern __visible unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 4215653f8..042f363a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -243,8 +243,7 @@ __visible unsigned int __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "IRQ failed to wake up RCU");
 
 	desc = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
-
-	if (!handle_irq(desc, regs)) {
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc)) {
 		ack_APIC_irq();
 
 		if (desc != VECTOR_RETRIGGERED && desc != VECTOR_SHUTDOWN) {
@@ -254,6 +253,8 @@ __visible unsigned int __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		} else {
 			__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_UNUSED);
 		}
+	} else {
+		handle_irq(desc, regs);
 	}
 
 	exiting_irq();
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
index fc34816c6..a759ca97c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
@@ -148,18 +148,13 @@ void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
 	call_on_stack(__do_softirq, isp);
 }
 
-bool handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
+void handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	int overflow = check_stack_overflow();
 
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc))
-		return false;
-
 	if (user_mode(regs) || !execute_on_irq_stack(overflow, desc)) {
 		if (unlikely(overflow))
 			print_stack_overflow();
 		generic_handle_irq_desc(desc);
 	}
-
-	return true;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
index 6bf6517a0..cd4595b71 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
@@ -26,13 +26,9 @@
 DEFINE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED(struct irq_stack, irq_stack_backing_store) __visible;
 DECLARE_INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_backing_store);
 
-bool handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
+void handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc))
-		return false;
-
 	generic_handle_irq_desc(desc);
-	return true;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
-- 
2.22.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq: slightly improve do_IRQ
  2019-08-04  8:18 [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: slightly improve handle_irq Heiner Kallweit
  2019-08-04  8:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/irq: improve definition of VECTOR_SHUTDOWN et al Heiner Kallweit
  2019-08-04  8:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: factor out IS_ERR_OR_NULL check from platfom-specific handle_irq Heiner Kallweit
@ 2019-08-04  8:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2019-08-04  8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, H. Peter Anvin, x86
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

It's simpler and more intuitive to directly check for VECTOR_UNUSED.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 042f363a8..2f1a78c4d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ __visible unsigned int __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc)) {
 		ack_APIC_irq();
 
-		if (desc != VECTOR_RETRIGGERED && desc != VECTOR_SHUTDOWN) {
+		if (desc == VECTOR_UNUSED) {
 			pr_emerg_ratelimited("%s: %d.%d No irq handler for vector\n",
 					     __func__, smp_processor_id(),
 					     vector);
-- 
2.22.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: factor out IS_ERR_OR_NULL check from platfom-specific handle_irq
  2019-08-04  8:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: factor out IS_ERR_OR_NULL check from platfom-specific handle_irq Heiner Kallweit
@ 2019-08-19 10:41   ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2019-08-19 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heiner Kallweit
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, H. Peter Anvin, x86,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> -
> -	if (!handle_irq(desc, regs)) {
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc)) {

This really want's an unlikely or preferrably be written as:

	if (likely(!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc))) {
		handle_irq(desc);
	} else {

>  		ack_APIC_irq();
>  
>  		if (desc != VECTOR_RETRIGGERED && desc != VECTOR_SHUTDOWN) {
> @@ -254,6 +253,8 @@ __visible unsigned int __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		} else {
>  			__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_UNUSED);
>  		}
> +	} else {
> +		handle_irq(desc, regs);
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
> index 6bf6517a0..cd4595b71 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
> @@ -26,13 +26,9 @@
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED(struct irq_stack, irq_stack_backing_store) __visible;
>  DECLARE_INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_backing_store);
>  
> -bool handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +void handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc))
> -		return false;
> -
>  	generic_handle_irq_desc(desc);

With that the function call does not make any sense for 64bit. So the
wrapper should be an inline and only for 32bit a function call.

Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-19 10:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-04  8:18 [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: slightly improve handle_irq Heiner Kallweit
2019-08-04  8:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/irq: improve definition of VECTOR_SHUTDOWN et al Heiner Kallweit
2019-08-04  8:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: factor out IS_ERR_OR_NULL check from platfom-specific handle_irq Heiner Kallweit
2019-08-19 10:41   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-04  8:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq: slightly improve do_IRQ Heiner Kallweit

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).