linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tty: use tty_init_dev_retry() to workaround a race condition
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:05:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eef58b47-f208-2ac5-6e02-a87f9568c70f@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191121210155.limd7v6cpd5yz2e7@debian>

On 21. 11. 19, 22:01, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:41:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:22:39PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> There seems to be a race condition in tty drivers and I could see on
>>> many boot cycles a NULL pointer dereference as tty_init_dev() tries to
>>> do 'tty->port->itty = tty' even though tty->port is NULL.
>>> 'tty->port' will be set by the driver and if the driver has not yet done
>>> it before we open the tty device we can get to this situation. By adding
>>> some extra debug prints, I noticed that:
>>>
>>> 6.650130: uart_add_one_port
>>> 6.663849: register_console
>>> 6.664846: tty_open
>>> 6.674391: tty_init_dev
>>> 6.675456: tty_port_link_device
>>>
>>> uart_add_one_port() registers the console, as soon as it registers, the
>>> userspace tries to use it and that leads to tty_open() but
>>> uart_add_one_port() has not yet done tty_port_link_device() and so
>>> tty->port is not yet configured when control reaches tty_init_dev().
>>
>> Shouldn't we do tty_port_link_device() before uart_add_one_port() to
>> remove that race?  Once you register the console, yes, tty_open() can
>> happen, so the driver had better be ready to go at that point in time.
>>
> 
> But tty_port_link_device() is done by uart_add_one_port() itself.
> After registering the console uart_add_one_port() will call
> tty_port_register_device_attr_serdev() and tty_port_link_device() is
> called from this. Thats still tty core.

Interferences of console vs tty code are ugly. Does it help to simply
put tty_port_link_device to uart_add_one_port before uart_configure_port?

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-22  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-21 15:22 [PATCH v2 1/2] tty: add retry capability to tty_init_dev() Sudip Mukherjee
2019-11-21 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tty: use tty_init_dev_retry() to workaround a race condition Sudip Mukherjee
2019-11-21 16:41   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-21 21:01     ` Sudip Mukherjee
2019-11-22  9:05       ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2019-11-22  9:11         ` Jiri Slaby
2019-11-24  0:02           ` Sudip Mukherjee
2019-11-25 10:42             ` Jiri Slaby
2019-12-10 11:41         ` Sudip Mukherjee
2019-12-12 11:15           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-12-17 11:47             ` Sudip Mukherjee
2019-12-17 12:05               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eef58b47-f208-2ac5-6e02-a87f9568c70f@suse.com \
    --to=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).