From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<kernel-team@android.com>
Cc: Light Hsieh <Light.Hsieh@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid race condition for shinker count
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:15:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f195a4f0-34af-1594-f443-be8ba3058707@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109170012.2129411-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
On 2020/11/10 1:00, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Light reported sometimes shinker gets nat_cnt < dirty_nat_cnt resulting in
I didn't get the problem clearly, did you mean __count_nat_entries() will
give the wrong shrink count due to race condition? should there be a lock
while reading these two variables?
> wrong do_shinker work. Basically the two counts should not happen like that.
>
> So, I suspect this race condtion where:
> - f2fs_try_to_free_nats __flush_nat_entry_set
> nat_cnt=2, dirty_nat_cnt=2
> __clear_nat_cache_dirty
> spin_lock(nat_list_lock)
> list_move()
> spin_unlock(nat_list_lock)
> spin_lock(nat_list_lock)
> list_del()
> spin_unlock(nat_list_lock)
> nat_cnt=1, dirty_nat_cnt=2
> nat_cnt=1, dirty_nat_cnt=1
nm_i->nat_cnt and nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt were protected by
nm_i->nat_tree_lock, I didn't see why expanding nat_list_lock range
will help... since there are still places nat_list_lock() didn't
cover these two reference counts.
Thanks,
>
> Reported-by: Light Hsieh <Light.Hsieh@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 42394de6c7eb..e8ec65e40f06 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -269,11 +269,10 @@ static void __clear_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
> {
> spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
> list_move_tail(&ne->list, &nm_i->nat_entries);
> - spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
> -
> set_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY, false);
> set->entry_cnt--;
> nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt--;
> + spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
> }
>
> static unsigned int __gang_lookup_nat_set(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-09 17:00 [PATCH] f2fs: avoid race condition for shinker count Jaegeuk Kim
2020-11-10 2:15 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2020-11-10 4:19 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-11-10 6:04 ` Chao Yu
2020-11-12 5:31 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-11-12 5:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-11-12 5:40 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-11-12 6:57 ` Chao Yu
2020-11-17 16:40 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-12-03 6:07 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-12-03 6:55 ` Chao Yu
2020-12-03 7:55 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-12-03 8:16 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f195a4f0-34af-1594-f443-be8ba3058707@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=Light.Hsieh@mediatek.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).