linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <dwmw2@infradead.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	<thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>, <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] iommu/vt-d: Add support for IOMMU default DMA mode build options
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:00:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3fe6c4b-f360-ab7b-7ad2-ced63269499d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46dbce5c-1c2b-60d4-df56-d2b95a959425@linux.intel.com>

On 17/06/2021 08:32, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 6/16/21 7:03 PM, John Garry wrote:
>> @@ -4382,9 +4380,9 @@ int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
>>            * is likely to be much lower than the overhead of 
>> synchronizing
>>            * the virtual and physical IOMMU page-tables.
>>            */
>> -        if (!intel_iommu_strict && cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap)) {
>> -            pr_warn("IOMMU batching is disabled due to virtualization");
>> -            intel_iommu_strict = 1;
>> +        if (cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap)) {
>> +            pr_warn("IOMMU batching disallowed due to 
>> virtualization\n");
>> +            iommu_set_dma_strict(true);
> 
> With this change, VM guest will always show this warning.

Would they have got it before also normally?

I mean, default is intel_iommu_strict=0, so if 
cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap) is true and intel_iommu_strict not set to 1 
elsewhere previously, then we would get this print.

> How about
> removing this message? Users could get the same information through the
> kernel message added by "[PATCH v13 2/6] iommu: Print strict or lazy
> mode at init time".

I think that the print from 2/6 should occur before this print.

Regardless I would think that you would still like to be notified of 
this change in policy, right?

However I now realize that the print is in a loop per iommu, so we would 
get it per iommu:

for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
	/*
	 * The flush queue implementation does not perform
	 * page-selective invalidations that are required for efficient
	 * TLB flushes in virtual environments.  The benefit of batching
	 * is likely to be much lower than the overhead of synchronizing
	 * the virtual and physical IOMMU page-tables.
	 */
	if (!intel_iommu_strict && cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap)) {
		pr_warn("IOMMU batching is disabled due to virtualization");
		intel_iommu_strict = 1;
	}
	...
}

I need to change that. How about this:

bool print_warning = false;

for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
	/*
	 * The flush queue implementation does not perform
	 * page-selective invalidations that are required for efficient
	 * TLB flushes in virtual environments.  The benefit of batching
	 * is likely to be much lower than the overhead of synchronizing
	 * the virtual and physical IOMMU page-tables.
	 */
	if (!print_warning && cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap)) {
		pr_warn("IOMMU batching disallowed due to virtualization\n");
		iommu_set_dma_strict(true);
		print_warning = true;
	}
	...
}

or use pr_warn_once().

Thanks,
John

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-16 11:03 [PATCH v13 0/6] iommu: Enhance IOMMU default DMA mode build options John Garry
2021-06-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 1/6] iommu: Deprecate Intel and AMD cmdline methods to enable strict mode John Garry
2021-06-17 19:01   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-18  7:43     ` John Garry
2021-06-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 2/6] iommu: Print strict or lazy mode at init time John Garry
2021-06-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 3/6] iommu: Enhance IOMMU default DMA mode build options John Garry
2021-06-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 4/6] iommu/vt-d: Add support for " John Garry
2021-06-17  7:32   ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-17  8:00     ` John Garry [this message]
2021-06-17 19:03       ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-18  1:46       ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-18  7:31         ` John Garry
2021-06-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 5/6] iommu/amd: " John Garry
2021-06-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v13 6/6] iommu: Remove mode argument from iommu_set_dma_strict() John Garry
2021-06-17  7:36   ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-17  7:41     ` John Garry
2021-06-18  1:52       ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-17 18:56     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-18  1:51       ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f3fe6c4b-f360-ab7b-7ad2-ced63269499d@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).