From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
freude@linux.ibm.com, mimu@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] s390: ap: kvm: add PQAP interception for AQIC
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:05:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4b3dec4-cdf6-85df-309e-b542ba83230a@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fedbde5-ef83-c67e-6352-fd492f258009@linux.ibm.com>
On 01.03.2019 13:03, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 28/02/2019 15:14, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> On 28/02/2019 14:52, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:16:09 +0100
>>> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 28/02/2019 12:22, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>
>>>>> So, to summarize, the function should do:
>>>>> - Is userspace supposed to emulate everything (!ECA_APIE)? Return
>>>>> -EOPNOTSUPP to hand control to it.
>>>>> - We are now interpreting the instruction in KVM. Do common checks
>>>>> (PSTATE etc.) and inject exceptions, if needed.
>>>>> - Now look at the fc; if there's a handler for it, call that; if not
>>>>> (case does not attempt to call a specific handler, or no handler
>>>>> registered), inject a specification exception. (Do we want pre-checks
>>>>> like for facility 65 here, or in the handler?)
>>>>>
>>>>> That response code 0x01 thingy probably needs to go into the specific
>>>>> handler function, if anywhere (don't know the semantics, sorry).
>>>>
>>>> What do you mean with specific handler function?
>>>>
>>>> If you mean a switch around the FC with static function's call, I agree,
>>>> if you mean a jump into a hook I do not agree.
>>>
>>> Ah, ok; so each case (that we want to handle) should call into a
>>> subhandler that does
>>> {
>>> (... check things like facilities ...)
>>> if (!specific_hook)
>>> inject_specif_excp_and_return();
>>> ret = specific_hook();
>>> if (ret)
>>> set_resp_code_0x01(); // or in specific_hook()?
>>> }
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> Yes something in this direction.
>
> Sorry, after reflection, no, we do not want to change the previous behavior so we only handle the AQIC case.
I think what you wanted to say is the following:
Today (without the patch set) we will answer PQAP with an exception.
With this patch set we want to handle FC==3, but nothing else. So for anything FC!=3 we
will continue to return an exception?
Correct?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-01 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-22 15:29 [PATCH v4 0/7] vfio: ap: AP Queue Interrupt Control Pierre Morel
2019-02-22 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] s390: ap: kvm: add PQAP interception for AQIC Pierre Morel
2019-02-25 18:36 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-26 11:47 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-26 15:47 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-27 8:09 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-27 9:13 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-27 10:16 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-27 18:00 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-28 9:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-02-28 11:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-02-28 11:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-28 13:16 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 13:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-28 14:14 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-01 12:03 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-01 12:05 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2019-03-01 12:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01 15:32 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 13:10 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 15:36 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-28 12:39 ` Halil Pasic
2019-02-28 14:12 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 16:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-01 12:10 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 15:43 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-28 13:23 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 13:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-02-28 13:47 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 14:07 ` Halil Pasic
2019-02-28 14:13 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 15:45 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-28 15:35 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-01 8:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-02-28 8:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-02-22 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] s390: ap: new vfio_ap_queue structure Pierre Morel
2019-02-26 16:10 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-27 8:40 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-27 20:35 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-22 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] s390: ap: associate a ap_vfio_queue and a matrix mdev Pierre Morel
2019-02-26 18:14 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-27 9:29 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-27 20:14 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-27 9:32 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-27 10:21 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-27 10:44 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-27 20:53 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-04 2:09 ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-04 10:19 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-05 22:17 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-12 21:39 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-13 10:19 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-22 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] vfio: ap: register IOMMU VFIO notifier Pierre Morel
2019-02-27 9:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-27 10:22 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 8:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-02-28 8:48 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 16:55 ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-01 7:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-02-22 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] s390: ap: implement PAPQ AQIC interception in kernel Pierre Morel
2019-02-26 18:23 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-27 9:54 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-27 18:17 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-27 18:18 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-28 20:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-03-01 9:35 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-04 1:57 ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-04 9:47 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-22 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] s390: ap: Cleanup on removing the AP device Pierre Morel
2019-02-26 18:27 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-27 9:58 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-04 13:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-08 22:43 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-11 8:31 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-12 21:53 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-13 10:15 ` Pierre Morel
2019-02-22 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] s390: ap: kvm: Enable PQAP/AQIC facility for the guest Pierre Morel
2019-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] vfio: ap: AP Queue Interrupt Control Halil Pasic
2019-03-01 9:40 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4b3dec4-cdf6-85df-309e-b542ba83230a@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).