Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/virtio: add in/out fence support for explicit synchronization

[Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>]

Hey Gerd,

On 2018-11-09 11:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 11:42, Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> When the execbuf call receives an in-fence it will get the dma_fence
>>> related to that fence fd and wait on it before submitting the draw call.
>>>
>>> On the out-fence side we get fence returned by the submitted draw call
>>> and attach it to a sync_file and send the sync_file fd to userspace. On
>>> error -1 is returned to userspace.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes since v3:
>>>   - Move all in_fence handling to the same VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN block
>> Fwiw my suggestion was to explicitly document whether the IOCTL can
>> support, simultaneously, IN and OUT fence.
> 
> Yes, that would be good.  Code looks like it is supposed to work, but
> explicitly saying so in the commit message would be nice.

On it! Will send out a v5.

> 
> Also: should we use separate fields for in/out fds?

I'm not sure I understand which fields you're referring to.

> 
> cheers,
>    Gerd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>