From: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/io: Don't use WZR in writel
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:30:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbacd3df-41c4-f98a-8875-db654aff3a5c@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ba7c4d0-30ec-e38d-41dc-653fd5cb7f05@arm.com>
On 18/03/2019 18:19, Robin Murphy wrote:
> For the context bank reset, yes, I am assuming that no complier will
> ever be perverse enough to detect that cfg is not written after the
> NULL check and immediately reallocate it to XZR for no good reason.
> I'd like to think that assumption is going to hold for the reasonable
> scope of this particular workaround, though.
I'm not sure I understand the above paragraph.
In code such as:
if (val == 0) foo(val);
gcc's algorithm is likely to figure out that the code is equivalent to
if (val == 0) foo(0)
and perform constant-propagation, etc.
Is that what we're talking about?
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-18 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-09 18:34 [PATCH] arm64/io: Don't use WZR in writel AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2019-02-11 10:57 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 11:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-11 14:29 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2019-02-11 14:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-11 16:15 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2019-02-11 16:37 ` Robin Murphy
2019-02-23 18:12 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-02-23 18:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-24 3:53 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-03-12 12:36 ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-03-18 16:04 ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-18 17:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-03-18 17:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-03-18 17:19 ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-18 17:24 ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-19 11:45 ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-18 17:30 ` Marc Gonzalez [this message]
2019-03-18 17:59 ` Robin Murphy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-02-09 18:30 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbacd3df-41c4-f98a-8875-db654aff3a5c@free.fr \
--to=marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kholk11@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).