linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop use_1G_block()
@ 2022-02-16  5:06 Anshuman Khandual
  2022-02-16  5:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-02-16  5:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-kernel

pud_sect_supported() already checks for PUD level block mapping support i.e
on ARM64_4K_PAGES config. Hence pud_sect_supported(), along with some other
required alignment checks can help completely drop use_1G_block().

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
This applies on v5.17-rc4

 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 15 ++-------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index acfae9b41cc8..5a7954c9e6ec 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -294,18 +294,6 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pmd(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr,
 	} while (addr = next, addr != end);
 }
 
-static inline bool use_1G_block(unsigned long addr, unsigned long next,
-			unsigned long phys)
-{
-	if (PAGE_SHIFT != 12)
-		return false;
-
-	if (((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) != 0)
-		return false;
-
-	return true;
-}
-
 static void alloc_init_pud(pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 			   phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot,
 			   phys_addr_t (*pgtable_alloc)(int),
@@ -338,7 +326,8 @@ static void alloc_init_pud(pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 		/*
 		 * For 4K granule only, attempt to put down a 1GB block
 		 */
-		if (use_1G_block(addr, next, phys) &&
+		if (pud_sect_supported() &&
+		   ((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 &&
 		    (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) {
 			pud_set_huge(pudp, phys, prot);
 
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop use_1G_block()
  2022-02-16  5:06 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop use_1G_block() Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-02-16  5:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
  2022-03-07 16:37 ` Catalin Marinas
  2022-03-07 22:03 ` Will Deacon
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-02-16  5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-kernel



On 2/16/22 10:36 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> pud_sect_supported() already checks for PUD level block mapping support i.e
> on ARM64_4K_PAGES config. Hence pud_sect_supported(), along with some other
> required alignment checks can help completely drop use_1G_block().
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> This applies on v5.17-rc4
> 
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 15 ++-------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index acfae9b41cc8..5a7954c9e6ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -294,18 +294,6 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pmd(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr,
>  	} while (addr = next, addr != end);
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool use_1G_block(unsigned long addr, unsigned long next,
> -			unsigned long phys)
> -{
> -	if (PAGE_SHIFT != 12)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) != 0)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
>  static void alloc_init_pud(pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>  			   phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot,
>  			   phys_addr_t (*pgtable_alloc)(int),
> @@ -338,7 +326,8 @@ static void alloc_init_pud(pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>  		/*
>  		 * For 4K granule only, attempt to put down a 1GB block
>  		 */
> -		if (use_1G_block(addr, next, phys) &&
> +		if (pud_sect_supported() &&
> +		   ((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 &&
>  		    (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) {

This is now very similar to init_pmd() block mapping check.

>  			pud_set_huge(pudp, phys, prot);
>  
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop use_1G_block()
  2022-02-16  5:06 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop use_1G_block() Anshuman Khandual
  2022-02-16  5:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-03-07 16:37 ` Catalin Marinas
  2022-03-07 22:03 ` Will Deacon
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2022-03-07 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Will Deacon, linux-kernel

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:36:52AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> pud_sect_supported() already checks for PUD level block mapping support i.e
> on ARM64_4K_PAGES config. Hence pud_sect_supported(), along with some other
> required alignment checks can help completely drop use_1G_block().
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

(in case Will still picks stuff for 5.18)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop use_1G_block()
  2022-02-16  5:06 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop use_1G_block() Anshuman Khandual
  2022-02-16  5:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
  2022-03-07 16:37 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2022-03-07 22:03 ` Will Deacon
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2022-03-07 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel, Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: catalin.marinas, kernel-team, Will Deacon, linux-kernel

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:36:52 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> pud_sect_supported() already checks for PUD level block mapping support i.e
> on ARM64_4K_PAGES config. Hence pud_sect_supported(), along with some other
> required alignment checks can help completely drop use_1G_block().
> 
> 

Applied to arm64 (for-next/mm), thanks!

[1/1] arm64/mm: Drop use_1G_block()
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/1310222c276b

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-07 22:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-16  5:06 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop use_1G_block() Anshuman Khandual
2022-02-16  5:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-07 16:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-07 22:03 ` Will Deacon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).