[PATCH] Revert "x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector" and fix the test

* [PATCH] Revert "x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector" and fix the test
@ 2019-07-15 14:21 Andy Lutomirski
  2019-07-15 15:17 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Lutomirski @ 2019-07-15 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LKML; +Cc: x86, Bae, Chang Seok, Andy Lutomirski

This reverts commit 48f5e52e916b55fb73754833efbacc7f8081a159.

The ptrace ABI change was a prerequisite to the proposed design for
FSGSBASE.  Since FSGSBASE support has been reverted, and since I'm
not convinced that the ABI was ever adequately tested, revert the
ABI change as well.

This also modifies the test case so that it tests the preexisting
behavior.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c               | 14 ++++++++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c | 22 ++++------------------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index 3108cdc00b29..a166c960bc9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -397,12 +397,22 @@ static int putreg(struct task_struct *child,
 	case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct,fs_base):
 		if (value >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
 			return -EIO;
-		x86_fsbase_write_task(child, value);
+		/*
+		 * When changing the FS base, use do_arch_prctl_64()
+		 * to set the index to zero and to set the base
+		 * as requested.
+		 */
+		if (child->thread.fsbase != value)
+			return do_arch_prctl_64(child, ARCH_SET_FS, value);
 		return 0;
 	case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct,gs_base):
+		/*
+		 * Exactly the same here as the %fs handling above.
+		 */
 		if (value >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
 			return -EIO;
-		x86_gsbase_write_task(child, value);
+		if (child->thread.gsbase != value)
+			return do_arch_prctl_64(child, ARCH_SET_GS, value);
 		return 0;
 #endif
 	}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
index 5ab4c60c100e..15a329da59fa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
@@ -489,25 +489,11 @@ static void test_ptrace_write_gsbase(void)
 		 * selector value is changed or not by the GSBASE write in
 		 * a ptracer.
 		 */
-		if (gs != *shared_scratch) {
-			nerrs++;
-			printf("[FAIL]\tGS changed to %lx\n", gs);
-
-			/*
-			 * On older kernels, poking a nonzero value into the
-			 * base would zero the selector.  On newer kernels,
-			 * this behavior has changed -- poking the base
-			 * changes only the base and, if FSGSBASE is not
-			 * available, this may have no effect.
-			 */
-			if (gs == 0)
-				printf("\tNote: this is expected behavior on older kernels.\n");
-		} else if (have_fsgsbase && (base != 0xFF)) {
-			nerrs++;
-			printf("[FAIL]\tGSBASE changed to %lx\n", base);
+		if (gs == 0 && base == 0xFF) {
+			printf("[OK]\tGS was reset as expected\n");
 		} else {
-			printf("[OK]\tGS remained 0x%hx%s", *shared_scratch, have_fsgsbase ? " and GSBASE changed to 0xFF" : "");
-			printf("\n");
+			nerrs++;
+			printf("[FAIL]\tGS=0x%lx, GSBASE=0x%lx (should be 0, 0xFF)\n", gs, base);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.21.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread