* [PATCH] drivers/nvme/host: Use kobj_to_dev() API
@ 2021-06-18 14:10 zhouchuangao
2021-06-18 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: zhouchuangao @ 2021-06-18 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg,
linux-nvme, linux-kernel
Cc: zhouchuangao
Use kobj_to_dev() API instead of container_of().
Signed-off-by: zhouchuangao <zhouchuangao@vivo.com>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 468d264..bec6965 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -3195,7 +3195,7 @@ static struct attribute *nvme_ns_id_attrs[] = {
static umode_t nvme_ns_id_attrs_are_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
struct attribute *a, int n)
{
- struct device *dev = container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
+ struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
struct nvme_ns_ids *ids = &dev_to_ns_head(dev)->ids;
if (a == &dev_attr_uuid.attr) {
@@ -3467,7 +3467,7 @@ static struct attribute *nvme_dev_attrs[] = {
static umode_t nvme_dev_attrs_are_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
struct attribute *a, int n)
{
- struct device *dev = container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
+ struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
if (a == &dev_attr_delete_controller.attr && !ctrl->ops->delete_ctrl)
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers/nvme/host: Use kobj_to_dev() API
2021-06-18 14:10 [PATCH] drivers/nvme/host: Use kobj_to_dev() API zhouchuangao
@ 2021-06-18 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-19 5:01 ` 周传高
2021-06-21 10:18 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-06-18 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhouchuangao
Cc: Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg,
linux-nvme, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 07:10:58AM -0700, zhouchuangao wrote:
> Use kobj_to_dev() API instead of container_of().
Why? That just makes the code harder to read.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re:Re: [PATCH] drivers/nvme/host: Use kobj_to_dev() API
2021-06-18 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-06-19 5:01 ` 周传高
2021-06-20 17:27 ` Keith Busch
2021-06-21 10:18 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: 周传高 @ 2021-06-19 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg,
linux-nvme, linux-kernel
>On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 07:10:58AM -0700, zhouchuangao wrote:
>> Use kobj_to_dev() API instead of container_of().
>
>Why? That just makes the code harder to read.
In my opinion, the kobj_to_dev() interface is provided by the kernel so that
we can get device based on kobj without having to pass more parameters.
I think it's easier to use.
Thansk,
zhouchaungao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [PATCH] drivers/nvme/host: Use kobj_to_dev() API
2021-06-19 5:01 ` 周传高
@ 2021-06-20 17:27 ` Keith Busch
2021-06-21 3:11 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2021-06-20 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 周传高
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Jens Axboe, Sagi Grimberg, linux-nvme, linux-kernel
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 01:01:34PM +0800, 周传高 wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 07:10:58AM -0700, zhouchuangao wrote:
> >> Use kobj_to_dev() API instead of container_of().
> >
> >Why? That just makes the code harder to read.
>
> In my opinion, the kobj_to_dev() interface is provided by the kernel so that
> we can get device based on kobj without having to pass more parameters.
> I think it's easier to use.
This same patch has been proposed and rejected numerous times. Do we
need to place a comment in the code to prevent future requests?
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2021-March/023316.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2021-February/023060.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2020-September/019462.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers/nvme/host: Use kobj_to_dev() API
2021-06-20 17:27 ` Keith Busch
@ 2021-06-21 3:11 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni @ 2021-06-21 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Busch
Cc: 周传高,
Christoph Hellwig, Jens Axboe, Sagi Grimberg, linux-nvme,
linux-kernel
Keith,
On 6/20/21 10:34, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 01:01:34PM +0800, 周传高 wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 07:10:58AM -0700, zhouchuangao wrote:
>>>> Use kobj_to_dev() API instead of container_of().
>>> Why? That just makes the code harder to read.
>> In my opinion, the kobj_to_dev() interface is provided by the kernel so that
>> we can get device based on kobj without having to pass more parameters.
>> I think it's easier to use.
> This same patch has been proposed and rejected numerous times. Do we
> need to place a comment in the code to prevent future requests?
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2021-March/023316.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2021-February/023060.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2020-September/019462.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvme mailing list
> Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
>
Just sent a patch with your suggested-by see if that is useful.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers/nvme/host: Use kobj_to_dev() API
2021-06-18 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-19 5:01 ` 周传高
@ 2021-06-21 10:18 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult @ 2021-06-21 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig, zhouchuangao
Cc: Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Sagi Grimberg, linux-nvme, linux-kernel
On 18.06.21 16:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 07:10:58AM -0700, zhouchuangao wrote:
>> Use kobj_to_dev() API instead of container_of().
>
> Why? That just makes the code harder to read.
Why so ? Why to we have kobj_to_dev() at all ?
Do you suggest, we shall get rid of it (and all similar ones) ?
--mtx
--
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-21 10:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-18 14:10 [PATCH] drivers/nvme/host: Use kobj_to_dev() API zhouchuangao
2021-06-18 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-19 5:01 ` 周传高
2021-06-20 17:27 ` Keith Busch
2021-06-21 3:11 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-06-21 10:18 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).