linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 05/10] powerpc/bpf/32: BPF prog is never called with more than one arg
Date: Thu,  1 Dec 2022 08:56:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff9b336d163e4c53c44f2b42166c18f0ad921900.1669881248.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa025537f584599c0271fc129c5cf4f57fbe7505.1669881248.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

BPF progs are never called with more than one argument, plus the
tail call count as a second argument when needed.

So, no need to retrieve 9th and 10th argument (5th 64 bits argument)
from the stack in prologue.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 7f54d37bede6..7c129fe810f5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -159,12 +159,6 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
 		if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, i))
 			EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(i, _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, i)));
 
-	/* If needed retrieve arguments 9 and 10, ie 5th 64 bits arg.*/
-	if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5))) {
-		EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5) - 1, _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME(ctx)) + 8);
-		EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5), _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME(ctx)) + 12);
-	}
-
 	/* Setup frame pointer to point to the bpf stack area */
 	if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP))) {
 		EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP) - 1, 0));
-- 
2.38.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-01  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-01  7:56 [PATCH v1 01/10] powerpc/bpf/32: Fix Oops on tail call tests Christophe Leroy
2022-12-01  7:56 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] powerpc: Remove __kernel_text_address() in show_instructions() Christophe Leroy
2022-12-01  7:56 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] powerpc/bpf/32: No need to zeroise r4 when not doing tail call Christophe Leroy
2022-12-01  7:56 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] powerpc/bpf/32: Only set a stack frame when necessary Christophe Leroy
2022-12-01  7:56 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2022-12-01  7:56 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] powerpc/bpf: Perform complete extra passes to update addresses Christophe Leroy
2022-12-13 10:23   ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-12-19 19:06     ` Christophe Leroy
2023-01-10  8:44       ` Naveen N. Rao
2023-01-31  9:52         ` Christophe Leroy
2022-12-01  7:56 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] powerpc/bpf: Only pad length-variable code at initial pass Christophe Leroy
2022-12-01  7:56 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] powerpc/bpf/32: Optimise some particular const operations Christophe Leroy
2022-12-01  7:56 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] powerpc/bpf/32: introduce a second source register for ALU operations Christophe Leroy
2022-12-01  7:56 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] powerpc/bpf/32: perform three operands " Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff9b336d163e4c53c44f2b42166c18f0ad921900.1669881248.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).