N_HCI for S390x missing in 2.4.5

N_HCI for S390x missing in 2.4.5

[Andreas Jaeger]

Looking at the patch for 2.4.5, I noticed that all architectures use
N_HCI - except s390x which has N_BT.

Why is this different?  I propose to use N_HCI everywhere,

Andreas

diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.4.5/linux/include/asm-s390/termios.h linux/include/asm-s390/termios.h
--- v2.4.5/linux/include/asm-s390/termios.h     Tue Feb 13 14:13:44 2001
+++ linux/include/asm-s390/termios.h    Mon Jun 11 19:15:27 2001
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
 #define N_IRDA         11      /* Linux IR - http://irda.sourceforge.net/ */
 #define N_SMSBLOCK     12      /* SMS block mode - for talking to GSM data cards about SMS messages */
 #define N_HDLC         13      /* synchronous HDLC */
+#define N_HCI          15  /* Bluetooth HCI UART */
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.4.5/linux/include/asm-s390x/termios.h linux/include/asm-s390x/termios.h
--- v2.4.5/linux/include/asm-s390x/termios.h    Wed Apr 11 19:02:29 2001
+++ linux/include/asm-s390x/termios.h   Mon Jun 11 19:15:27 2001
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
 #define N_IRDA         11      /* Linux IR - http://irda.sourceforge.net/ */
 #define N_SMSBLOCK     12      /* SMS block mode - for talking to GSM data cards about SMS messages */
 #define N_HDLC         13      /* synchronous HDLC */
+#define N_BT           15      /* bluetooth */
 

-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

Re: N_HCI for S390x missing in 2.4.5

[Martin Schwidefsky]

>Looking at the patch for 2.4.5, I noticed that all architectures use
>N_HCI - except s390x which has N_BT.
>
>Why is this different?  I propose to use N_HCI everywhere,

It should not be different for s390x. Probably a typo. I will fix it
and the patch will go out with the next update.

blue skies,
   Martin

Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247
E-Mail: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com