* 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 @ 2009-01-11 11:12 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:12 ` [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (16 more replies) 0 siblings, 17 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List [Notes: * 2.6.29-rc1 is out so it's time for a regressions report. At the moment there are not too many regressions from 2.6.28 listed. * We've got quite a number of regressions from 2.6.27 reported against 2.6.28 final recently. For this reason, I'm going to continue reporting regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. * Regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 won't be listed any more. There are only 6 of them left and they don't seem to be urgent. ] This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.28, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-01-11 13 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420 Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419 Subject : possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma Submitter : Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Date : 2009-01-08 14:11 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418 Subject : Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears Submitter : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Date : 2009-01-07 22:43 (5 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417 Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4 Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12416 Subject : Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Date : 2009-01-06 15:15 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123125495000603&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415 Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414 Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12402 Subject : 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-09 04:41 (3 days old) References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general/27548 Handled-By : Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12399 Subject : USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2009-01-08 7:35 (4 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fd9086a518d4f14213a32fe6c9ac17fabebbc1e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123140019117968&w=4 Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428 Subject : Build error on latest git Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4 Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12427 Subject : cpumask change causes sparc build bustage Submitter : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date : 2009-01-11 8:31 (1 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=588235bb53f2c215f0d4b08fd30b461fedc3338e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166268013838&w=4 Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167571525706&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12400 Subject : git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup Submitter : Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> Date : 2009-01-08 20:05 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123144520124853&w=4 Handled-By : Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123152033725557&w=4 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.28, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12398 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 21:14 ` Maxim Levitsky 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" Rafael J. Wysocki ` (15 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12399 Subject : USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2009-01-08 7:35 (4 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fd9086a518d4f14213a32fe6c9ac17fabebbc1e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123140019117968&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 2009-01-11 11:12 ` [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 21:14 ` Maxim Levitsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Maxim Levitsky @ 2009-01-11 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Greg Kroah-Hartman On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 12:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12399 > Subject : USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 > Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > Date : 2009-01-08 7:35 (4 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fd9086a518d4f14213a32fe6c9ac17fabebbc1e > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123140019117968&w=4 > Happens here on aspire 5720G, and yes unloading ehci_hcd makes suspend/resume work, otherwise system resumes immediately. best regards, Maxim Levitsky ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:12 ` [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-14 7:38 ` Alexey Fisher 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12402] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Fisher, H. Peter Anvin, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, Suresh Siddha, venkatesh.pallipadi, Venkatesh Pallipadi This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417 Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4 Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-14 7:38 ` Alexey Fisher 2009-01-14 7:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Alexey Fisher @ 2009-01-14 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, H. Peter Anvin, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, Suresh Siddha Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417 > Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" > Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> > Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3 > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4 > Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html There is no more warnings on the xorg start, but x server will completly freeze on glxgears. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* RE: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" 2009-01-14 7:38 ` Alexey Fisher @ 2009-01-14 7:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh 0 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh @ 2009-01-14 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Fisher, Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, H. Peter Anvin, Siddha, Suresh B, airlied >-----Original Message----- >From: Alexey Fisher [mailto:bug-track@fisher-privat.net] >Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:39 PM >To: Rafael J. Wysocki >Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Kernel Testers List; H. Peter >Anvin; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Siddha, Suresh B >Subject: Re: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: >PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" > >Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb: >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of recent regressions. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and >let me know >> (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417 >> Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: >implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" >> Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> >> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old) >> First-Bad-Commit: >http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.gi >t;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3 >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4 >> Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >kernel-testers" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >There is no more warnings on the xorg start, but x server will >completly >freeze on glxgears. > Yes. But, that is a different bug with DRM changes. This fix just unmasks the bug now. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418 Thanks, Venki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12402] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:12 ` [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12400] git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander Beregalov, Christoph Hellwig, Eric Sandeen This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12402 Subject : 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-09 04:41 (3 days old) References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general/27548 Handled-By : Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12400] git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12402] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? Rafael J. Wysocki ` (12 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dirk Hohndel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12400 Subject : git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup Submitter : Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> Date : 2009-01-08 20:05 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123144520124853&w=4 Handled-By : Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123152033725557&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12400] git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (11 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jeff Chua This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414 Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 18:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414 > Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (7 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4 Latest git pull still not fixed. Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 18:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Chua; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sunday 11 January 2009, Jeff Chua wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414 > > Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? > > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > > Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (7 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4 > > Latest git pull still not fixed. Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-12 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12416] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christian Borntraeger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415 Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-12 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-12 12:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-12 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415 > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4 Meanwhile I have updated the device firmware and the kernel level. The problems has disappeared. Christian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 2009-01-12 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-12 12:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-18 15:49 ` Christian Borntraeger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-12 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Borntraeger; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Monday 12 January 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415 > > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 > > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > > Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4 > > Meanwhile I have updated the device firmware and the kernel level. The > problems has disappeared. Thanks for the update, the bug has been closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 2009-01-12 12:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-18 15:49 ` Christian Borntraeger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-18 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Am Montag 12 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > On Monday 12 January 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > > > know (either way). > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415 > > > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 > > > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > > > Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (7 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4 > > > > Meanwhile I have updated the device firmware and the kernel level. The > > problems has disappeared. > > Thanks for the update, the bug has been closed. Since suspend/resume now works I have seen this problem again. I dont know how to trigger this, but I have made several suspend/resume cycles since yesterday: [11182.292341] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 iwl_set_dynamic_key+0x4be/0x4d0() [11182.292343] Hardware name: 64575GG [11182.292344] no space for new kewModules linked in: psmouse [11182.292349] Pid: 21185, comm: events/1 Not tainted 2.6.29-rc2-self-00004-g812c74b #164 [11182.292350] Call Trace: [11182.292355] [<c014ccb7>] warn_slowpath+0x87/0xe0 [11182.292358] [<c036c66f>] iwl_send_cmd_async+0x3f/0x90 [11182.292360] [<c011f69a>] __switch_to+0xca/0x1d0 [11182.292363] [<c03711ef>] iwl_send_add_sta+0x7f/0x120 [11182.292366] [<c014666f>] finish_task_switch+0x1f/0xb0 [11182.292369] [<c05469ed>] schedule_timeout+0xbd/0xf0 [11182.292372] [<c0370fe0>] iwl_add_sta_callback+0x0/0x70 [11182.292374] [<c013ab65>] default_spin_lock_flags+0x5/0x10 [11182.292377] [<c054804d>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 [11182.292379] [<c03720de>] iwl_set_dynamic_key+0x4be/0x4d0 [11182.292381] [<c013ab65>] default_spin_lock_flags+0x5/0x10 [11182.292383] [<c054804d>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 [11182.292385] [<c0370e56>] iwl_find_station+0xd6/0x110 [11182.292388] [<c0373951>] iwl_scan_cancel_timeout+0x21/0x90 [11182.292390] [<c037576b>] iwl_mac_set_key+0x8b/0x160 [11182.292393] [<c03756e0>] iwl_mac_set_key+0x0/0x160 [11182.292395] [<c0530340>] __ieee80211_key_todo+0xd0/0x260 [11182.292398] [<c015e5b3>] queue_delayed_work_on+0xa3/0xd0 [11182.292400] [<c05305ef>] ieee80211_key_todo+0xf/0x20 [11182.292403] [<c015dd8b>] run_workqueue+0x6b/0x130 [11182.292405] [<c013ab65>] default_spin_lock_flags+0x5/0x10 [11182.292407] [<c054804d>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 [11182.292409] [<c0530600>] key_todo+0x0/0x10 [11182.292412] [<c015ded8>] worker_thread+0x88/0xf0 [11182.292414] [<c01619d0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [11182.292417] [<c015de50>] worker_thread+0x0/0xf0 [11182.292419] [<c0161609>] kthread+0x39/0x70 [11182.292420] [<c01615d0>] kthread+0x0/0x70 [11182.292423] [<c01210d3>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14 [11182.292424] ---[ end trace 94103c51f16e0890 ]--- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12416] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() Rafael J. Wysocki ` (9 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jan Beulich, Sam Ravnborg, Theodore Ts'o This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12416 Subject : Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Date : 2009-01-06 15:15 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123125495000603&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12416] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 14:52 ` Alexey Fisher 2009-01-14 7:35 ` Alexey Rempel 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 2 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Christian Borntraeger, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420 Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 14:52 ` Alexey Fisher 2009-01-14 7:35 ` Alexey Rempel 1 sibling, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Alexey Fisher @ 2009-01-11 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Christian Borntraeger, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420 > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4 > I just realised, this warning message normally should inculde DMI System Product Name ( Hardware Name ), but my board do not support this filed ( it geve only "System Product Name" ) and use only DMI Board Product Name instead. It should be "5LD2-VM". ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x480/0x6c2() Hardware name: System Product Name ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Should be like: Hradware name: P5LD2-VM See my dmidecoe: Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 27 bytes System Information Manufacturer: stem manufacturer Product Name: System Product Name Version: System Version Serial Number: System Serial Number UUID: [------------cuted out--------------] Wake-up Type: PCI PME# SKU Number: <BAD INDEX> Family: <BAD INDEX> Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC. Product Name: P5LD2-VM Version: Rev 1.xx Serial Number: MB-1234567890 Asset Tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. Features: Board is a hosting board Board is replaceable Location In Chassis: To Be Filled By O.E.M. Chassis Handle: 0x0003 Type: Motherboard Contained Object Handles: 0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 14:52 ` Alexey Fisher @ 2009-01-14 7:35 ` Alexey Rempel 2009-01-14 7:40 ` Christian Borntraeger 1 sibling, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Alexey Rempel @ 2009-01-14 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Christian Borntraeger, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420 > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html This warning was disabled in latest git. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() 2009-01-14 7:35 ` Alexey Rempel @ 2009-01-14 7:40 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-14 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-14 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Rempel Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov Am Mittwoch 14 Januar 2009 schrieb Alexey Rempel: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420 > > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() > > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > > Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4 > This warning was disabled in latest git. Yes. After the discussion had a conclusion, I decided to to send a patch myself and Jeff sent it to Linus. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0f79f7ad3e52b908786462cf5446ebe20fe14fa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() 2009-01-14 7:40 ` Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-14 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-14 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Alexey Rempel, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Ingo Molnar, Jeff Garzik, Sergei Shtylyov On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am Mittwoch 14 Januar 2009 schrieb Alexey Rempel: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420 > > > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 > ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() > > > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > > > Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old) > > > First-Bad-Commit: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4 > > > > This warning was disabled in latest git. > > Yes. After the discussion had a conclusion, I decided to to send a patch > myself and Jeff sent it to Linus. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0f79f7ad3e52b908786462cf5446ebe20fe14fa Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Pallipadi, Venkatesh This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418 Subject : Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears Submitter : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Date : 2009-01-07 22:43 (5 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 14:08 ` Daniel Drake 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma Rafael J. Wysocki ` (6 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 2 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Drake, Jeff Chua, Phil Dibowitz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 14:08 ` Daniel Drake 1 sibling, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel Drake, Phil Dibowitz On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 Latest git pull still not fixed. Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 14:08 ` Daniel Drake 2009-01-11 14:18 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 16:10 ` Jeff Chua 1 sibling, 2 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Daniel Drake @ 2009-01-11 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jeff Chua, Phil Dibowitz Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault. Jeff, do you even have that camera? It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the unusual_devs entry for it. Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 14:08 ` Daniel Drake @ 2009-01-11 14:18 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 16:13 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 16:10 ` Jeff Chua 1 sibling, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-11 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Drake Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jeff Chua, Phil Dibowitz Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Daniel Drake: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > > The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault. > Jeff, do you even have that camera? > > It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the > unusual_devs entry for it. I found a nearby commit during bisect, which looks much saner: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 14:18 ` Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-11 16:13 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 16:18 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 16:29 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 2 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote: > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Daniel Drake: >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> > of recent regressions. >> > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know >> > (either way). >> > >> > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 >> > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str >> > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> >> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 >> >> The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault. >> Jeff, do you even have that camera? >> >> It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the >> unusual_devs entry for it. > > I found a nearby commit during bisect, which looks much saner: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=2 This was committed earlier than a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388, and a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 was the last working kernel that is able to suspend/resume. Go one before, and suspend/resume breaks. Thanks, Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 16:13 ` Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 16:18 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 16:29 ` Ingo Molnar 1 sibling, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-11 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Chua Cc: Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Jeff Chua: > > I found a nearby commit during bisect, which looks much saner: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=2 > > This was committed earlier than > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388, and > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 was the last working kernel > that is able to suspend/resume. Go one before, and suspend/resume > breaks. Yes, I am aware that this patch fixes one of the many S2R problems in 2.6.29-rc. Thats why I had commit a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 Author: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed Jan 7 16:19:46 2009 +0100 stop_machine/cpu hotplug: fix disable_nonboot_cpus as an additional patch applied during my bisect. Christian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 16:13 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 16:18 ` Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-11 16:29 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-11 16:36 ` Christian Borntraeger 1 sibling, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Chua Cc: Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz * Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Christian Borntraeger > <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Daniel Drake: > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> > of recent regressions. > >> > > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > >> > (either way). > >> > > >> > > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > >> > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > >> > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > >> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > >> > >> The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault. > >> Jeff, do you even have that camera? > >> > >> It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the > >> unusual_devs entry for it. > > > > I found a nearby commit during bisect, which looks much saner: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=2 > > This was committed earlier than > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388, and > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 was the last working kernel > that is able to suspend/resume. Go one before, and suspend/resume > breaks. so you mean a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 seems good, while the next step in Linus's tree, 52fefcec97c25b15887e6a9a885ca54e7f7c0928 is already broken? Does 52fefcec97c25b15887e6a9a885ca54e7f7c0928 start working if you do: git checkout 52fefcec97c25b15887e6a9a885ca54e7f7c0928 git revert a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 ? That would implicate a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 + some layout/timing problem - which does not trigger for some reason if pure a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 is tried. Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 16:29 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 16:36 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 16:39 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-11 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jeff Chua, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Ingo Molnar: > > * Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Christian Borntraeger > > <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Daniel Drake: > > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > >> > of recent regressions. > > >> > > > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > >> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > >> > (either way). > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > > >> > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > > >> > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > > >> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > > >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > > >> > > >> The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault. > > >> Jeff, do you even have that camera? > > >> > > >> It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the > > >> unusual_devs entry for it. > > > > > > I found a nearby commit during bisect, which looks much saner: > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=2 > > > > This was committed earlier than > > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388, and > > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 was the last working kernel > > that is able to suspend/resume. Go one before, and suspend/resume > > breaks. > > so you mean a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 seems good, while the > next step in Linus's tree, 52fefcec97c25b15887e6a9a885ca54e7f7c0928 is > already broken? I guess Jeff, meant the other way around. Since a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 is a fix for a known S2R problem , the earlier patch (before) does of course not work. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 16:36 ` Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-11 16:39 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-11 16:56 ` Jeff Chua 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Jeff Chua, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz * Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote: > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Ingo Molnar: > > > > * Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Christian Borntraeger > > > <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Daniel Drake: > > > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > >> > of recent regressions. > > > >> > > > > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > >> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > know > > > >> > (either way). > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > > > >> > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > > > >> > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > > > >> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > > > >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > > > >> > > > >> The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault. > > > >> Jeff, do you even have that camera? > > > >> > > > >> It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the > > > >> unusual_devs entry for it. > > > > > > > > I found a nearby commit during bisect, which looks much saner: > > > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=2 > > > > > > This was committed earlier than > > > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388, and > > > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 was the last working kernel > > > that is able to suspend/resume. Go one before, and suspend/resume > > > breaks. > > > > so you mean a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 seems good, while the > > next step in Linus's tree, 52fefcec97c25b15887e6a9a885ca54e7f7c0928 is > > already broken? > > I guess Jeff, meant the other way around. > Since a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 is a fix for a known S2R > problem , the earlier patch (before) does of course not work. ah, okay. So i suspect that at every bisection point, this should be done: git cherry-pick a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 To make sure the bisection finds the secondary breakage too. (the cherry-pick will fail harmlessly on kernels that have that commit already - so it can be done unconditionally at every bisection point.) Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 16:39 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 16:56 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 18:07 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > * Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote >> I guess Jeff, meant the other way around. >> Since a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 is a fix for a known S2R >> problem , the earlier patch (before) does of course not work. > ah, okay. > So i suspect that at every bisection point, this should be done: > git cherry-pick a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 I started with the latest git, and did this ... git bisect start git bisect bad git bisect good a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 Everything in-between should have a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 applied? Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 16:56 ` Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 18:07 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-13 1:20 ` Jeff Chua 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Chua Cc: Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz * Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > * Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote > >> I guess Jeff, meant the other way around. > >> Since a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 is a fix for a known S2R > >> problem , the earlier patch (before) does of course not work. > > ah, okay. > > So i suspect that at every bisection point, this should be done: > > git cherry-pick a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 > > I started with the latest git, and did this ... > > git bisect start > git bisect bad > git bisect good a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 > > Everything in-between should have > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 applied? not necessarily - if an intermediate tree that is checked happened to have been based on some earlier -rc, it might have that bug included. Safest is to always cherry-pick that commit. (if it has no dependencies) Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 18:07 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-13 1:20 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-13 1:28 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-13 2:08 ` Linus Torvalds 0 siblings, 2 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-13 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ingo Molnar, Linus Torvalds Cc: Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: >> Everything in-between should have >> a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 applied? > not necessarily - if an intermediate tree that is checked happened to have > been based on some earlier -rc, it might have that bug included. Safest is > to always cherry-pick that commit. (if it has no dependencies) Thanks for pointing this out. My bisect was thrown off course because I didn't "cherry-pick" that commit. After cherry picking, I ended up with the same commit as was reported by Christian Borntraeger -- "Regression 2.6.28-git: suspend/resume failure. git bisected to usb suspend/resume patch". I was trying to bisect further, but ended up with this strange behavior... # start with a "fresh linux git download". # ls . .. .git .gitignore .mailmap COPYING CREDITS Documentation Kbuild MAINTAINERS Makefile README REPORTING-BUGS arch block crypto drivers firmware fs include init ipc kernel lib mm net samples scripts security sound usr virt # git bisect bad ae04d1401577bb63151480a053057de58b8e10bb # git bisect good a3a798c88a14b35e5d4ca30716dbc9eb9a1ddfe2 Bisecting: 579 revisions left to test after this [079899c2384023cd8efcd3806680b4f1d2abbd54] Btrfs: Change find_extent_buffer to use TestSetPageLocked # ls . .. .git fs Is this a bug or a feature? Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-13 1:20 ` Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-13 1:28 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-13 2:08 ` Linus Torvalds 1 sibling, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-13 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Chua Cc: Linus Torvalds, Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz * Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > >> Everything in-between should have > >> a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 applied? > > not necessarily - if an intermediate tree that is checked happened to have > > been based on some earlier -rc, it might have that bug included. Safest is > > to always cherry-pick that commit. (if it has no dependencies) > > Thanks for pointing this out. My bisect was thrown off course because > I didn't "cherry-pick" that commit. > > After cherry picking, I ended up with the same commit as was reported by > Christian Borntraeger -- "Regression 2.6.28-git: suspend/resume > failure. git bisected to usb suspend/resume patch". > > I was trying to bisect further, but ended up with this strange behavior... > > # start with a "fresh linux git download". > # ls > . .. .git .gitignore .mailmap COPYING > CREDITS Documentation Kbuild MAINTAINERS Makefile README > REPORTING-BUGS arch block crypto drivers firmware > fs include init ipc kernel lib > mm net samples scripts security sound > usr virt > > # git bisect bad ae04d1401577bb63151480a053057de58b8e10bb > # git bisect good a3a798c88a14b35e5d4ca30716dbc9eb9a1ddfe2 > Bisecting: 579 revisions left to test after this > [079899c2384023cd8efcd3806680b4f1d2abbd54] Btrfs: Change > find_extent_buffer to use TestSetPageLocked > > # ls > . .. .git fs > > Is this a bug or a feature? that's a feature - the btrfs history looks like this. You can mark get out of that bisection set by doing this: git bisect good 34353029534a08e41cfb8be647d734b9ce9ebff8 Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-13 1:20 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-13 1:28 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-13 2:08 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-01-13 4:28 ` Jeff Chua 1 sibling, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2009-01-13 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Chua Cc: Ingo Molnar, Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Jeff Chua wrote: > > I was trying to bisect further, but ended up with this strange behavior... > > # git bisect good a3a798c88a14b35e5d4ca30716dbc9eb9a1ddfe2 > Bisecting: 579 revisions left to test after this > [079899c2384023cd8efcd3806680b4f1d2abbd54] Btrfs: Change > find_extent_buffer to use TestSetPageLocked > > # ls > . .. .git fs > > Is this a bug or a feature? You bisected into the btrfs development chain. Just say "git bisect good" when this happens, and you'll be ok. [ Unless, of course, you were to be actually trying to bisect a btrfs bug. If so, you'd need to compile btrfs as a module and insert it and do the bisection based on that ] Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-13 2:08 ` Linus Torvalds @ 2009-01-13 4:28 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-13 5:47 ` Jeff Chua 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-13 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds, Ingo Molnar Cc: Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > that's a feature - the btrfs history looks like this. You can mark get out > of that bisection set by doing this: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> Is this a bug or a feature? > You bisected into the btrfs development chain. Just say "git bisect good" > when this happens, and you'll be ok. Ingo, Linus, Thanks for the explanation. For a while, I was repeating the same thing just thinking my filesystem was corrupted. Now, I'm can happily continue to bisect further. Thanks, Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-13 4:28 ` Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-13 5:47 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-13 11:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-13 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds, Ingo Molnar Cc: Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 Fixed by reverting a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703. 7503bfbae89eba07b46441a5d1594647f6b8ab7d has already been reverted in the Linus's latest git tree. Thanks everyone for all the help. Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-13 5:47 ` Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-13 11:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-13 13:30 ` Jeff Chua 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-13 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Chua Cc: Linus Torvalds, Ingo Molnar, Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz, Alan Stern On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Jeff Chua wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > > Fixed by reverting a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703. > 7503bfbae89eba07b46441a5d1594647f6b8ab7d has already been reverted in > the Linus's latest git tree. Can you please check if the issue goes away when you apply the appended patch instead of reverting commit a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703 ? Rafael --- drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c | 116 ++++++++++---------------------------------- drivers/usb/core/hcd.h | 1 drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c | 1 drivers/usb/host/ohci-pci.c | 1 drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c | 1 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c +++ linux-2.6/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ int usb_hcd_pci_suspend(struct pci_dev * struct usb_hcd *hcd = pci_get_drvdata(dev); int retval = 0; int wake, w; + int has_pci_pm; /* Root hub suspend should have stopped all downstream traffic, * and all bus master traffic. And done so for both the interface @@ -230,6 +231,15 @@ int usb_hcd_pci_suspend(struct pci_dev * synchronize_irq(dev->irq); + /* Downstream ports from this root hub should already be quiesced, so + * there will be no DMA activity. Now we can shut down the upstream + * link (except maybe for PME# resume signaling) and enter some PCI + * low power state, if the hardware allows. + */ + pci_disable_device(dev); + + pci_save_state(dev); + /* Don't fail on error to enable wakeup. We rely on pci code * to reject requests the hardware can't implement, rather * than coding the same thing. @@ -241,35 +251,6 @@ int usb_hcd_pci_suspend(struct pci_dev * wake = w; dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "wakeup: %d\n", wake); - /* Downstream ports from this root hub should already be quiesced, so - * there will be no DMA activity. Now we can shut down the upstream - * link (except maybe for PME# resume signaling) and enter some PCI - * low power state, if the hardware allows. - */ - pci_disable_device(dev); - done: - return retval; -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_hcd_pci_suspend); - -/** - * usb_hcd_pci_suspend_late - suspend a PCI-based HCD after IRQs are disabled - * @dev: USB Host Controller being suspended - * @message: Power Management message describing this state transition - * - * Store this function in the HCD's struct pci_driver as .suspend_late. - */ -int usb_hcd_pci_suspend_late(struct pci_dev *dev, pm_message_t message) -{ - int retval = 0; - int has_pci_pm; - - /* We might already be suspended (runtime PM -- not yet written) */ - if (dev->current_state != PCI_D0) - goto done; - - pci_save_state(dev); - /* Don't change state if we don't need to */ if (message.event == PM_EVENT_FREEZE || message.event == PM_EVENT_PRETHAW) { @@ -315,7 +296,7 @@ int usb_hcd_pci_suspend_late(struct pci_ done: return retval; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_hcd_pci_suspend_late); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_hcd_pci_suspend); /** * usb_hcd_pci_resume_early - resume a PCI-based HCD before IRQs are enabled @@ -325,65 +306,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_hcd_pci_suspend_la */ int usb_hcd_pci_resume_early(struct pci_dev *dev) { - int retval = 0; - pci_power_t state = dev->current_state; - -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PMAC - /* Reenable ASIC clocks for USB */ - if (machine_is(powermac)) { - struct device_node *of_node; - - of_node = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev); - if (of_node) - pmac_call_feature(PMAC_FTR_USB_ENABLE, - of_node, 0, 1); - } -#endif - - /* NOTE: chip docs cover clean "real suspend" cases (what Linux - * calls "standby", "suspend to RAM", and so on). There are also - * dirty cases when swsusp fakes a suspend in "shutdown" mode. - */ - if (state != PCI_D0) { -#ifdef DEBUG - int pci_pm; - u16 pmcr; - - pci_pm = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PM); - pci_read_config_word(dev, pci_pm + PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcr); - pmcr &= PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK; - if (pmcr) { - /* Clean case: power to USB and to HC registers was - * maintained; remote wakeup is easy. - */ - dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "resume from PCI D%d\n", pmcr); - } else { - /* Clean: HC lost Vcc power, D0 uninitialized - * + Vaux may have preserved port and transceiver - * state ... for remote wakeup from D3cold - * + or not; HCD must reinit + re-enumerate - * - * Dirty: D0 semi-initialized cases with swsusp - * + after BIOS init - * + after Linux init (HCD statically linked) - */ - dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "resume from previous PCI D%d\n", - state); - } -#endif - - retval = pci_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D0); - } else { - /* Same basic cases: clean (powered/not), dirty */ - dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "PCI legacy resume\n"); - } - - if (retval < 0) - dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't resume: %d\n", retval); - else - pci_restore_state(dev); - - return retval; + pci_restore_state(dev); + return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_hcd_pci_resume_early); @@ -398,6 +322,18 @@ int usb_hcd_pci_resume(struct pci_dev *d struct usb_hcd *hcd; int retval; +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PMAC + /* Reenable ASIC clocks for USB */ + if (machine_is(powermac)) { + struct device_node *of_node; + + of_node = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev); + if (of_node) + pmac_call_feature(PMAC_FTR_USB_ENABLE, + of_node, 0, 1); + } +#endif + hcd = pci_get_drvdata(dev); if (hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED) { dev_dbg(hcd->self.controller, @@ -405,6 +341,8 @@ int usb_hcd_pci_resume(struct pci_dev *d return 0; } + pci_enable_wake(dev, PCI_D0, false); + retval = pci_enable_device(dev); if (retval < 0) { dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't re-enable after resume, %d!\n", Index: linux-2.6/drivers/usb/core/hcd.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/usb/core/hcd.h +++ linux-2.6/drivers/usb/core/hcd.h @@ -257,7 +257,6 @@ extern void usb_hcd_pci_remove(struct pc #ifdef CONFIG_PM extern int usb_hcd_pci_suspend(struct pci_dev *dev, pm_message_t msg); -extern int usb_hcd_pci_suspend_late(struct pci_dev *dev, pm_message_t msg); extern int usb_hcd_pci_resume_early(struct pci_dev *dev); extern int usb_hcd_pci_resume(struct pci_dev *dev); #endif /* CONFIG_PM */ Index: linux-2.6/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c +++ linux-2.6/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c @@ -432,7 +432,6 @@ static struct pci_driver ehci_pci_driver #ifdef CONFIG_PM .suspend = usb_hcd_pci_suspend, - .suspend_late = usb_hcd_pci_suspend_late, .resume_early = usb_hcd_pci_resume_early, .resume = usb_hcd_pci_resume, #endif Index: linux-2.6/drivers/usb/host/ohci-pci.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/usb/host/ohci-pci.c +++ linux-2.6/drivers/usb/host/ohci-pci.c @@ -487,7 +487,6 @@ static struct pci_driver ohci_pci_driver #ifdef CONFIG_PM .suspend = usb_hcd_pci_suspend, - .suspend_late = usb_hcd_pci_suspend_late, .resume_early = usb_hcd_pci_resume_early, .resume = usb_hcd_pci_resume, #endif Index: linux-2.6/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c +++ linux-2.6/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c @@ -942,7 +942,6 @@ static struct pci_driver uhci_pci_driver #ifdef CONFIG_PM .suspend = usb_hcd_pci_suspend, - .suspend_late = usb_hcd_pci_suspend_late, .resume_early = usb_hcd_pci_resume_early, .resume = usb_hcd_pci_resume, #endif /* PM */ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-13 11:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-13 13:30 ` Jeff Chua 0 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-13 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linus Torvalds, Ingo Molnar, Christian Borntraeger, Daniel Drake, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz, Alan Stern On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Jeff Chua wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: >> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 >> > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str >> > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> >> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 >> >> Fixed by reverting a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703. >> 7503bfbae89eba07b46441a5d1594647f6b8ab7d has already been reverted in >> the Linus's latest git tree. > > Can you please check if the issue goes away ... > instead of reverting commit a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703 Confirmed. This commit works. STR still ok. But now, a different problem. STD "almost" ok. Suspend-to-disk hangs after counting to 100%. Power-cycle and boot ok able to resume. ... Again, this is another problem with/without your latest patch. Another issue is with iwl4965 not able to attach to my hidden AP. Will try to bisect soon. Thanks for the patch. Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-11 14:08 ` Daniel Drake 2009-01-11 14:18 ` Christian Borntraeger @ 2009-01-11 16:10 ` Jeff Chua 1 sibling, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-11 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Drake Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Phil Dibowitz On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org> wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of recent regressions. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know >> (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 >> Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str >> Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> >> Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > > The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault. I have doubt about this too, but it's was git bisect zero into. All I know is a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 is definitely good. > Jeff, do you even have that camera? No, I don't have this. > It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the unusual_devs > entry for it. I'm lost reverting this. Right now, I'm just use "git diff" and throw away everything after a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388, and my system can STD, STR without an problem resuming. Thanks, Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12427] cpumask change causes sparc build bustage Rafael J. Wysocki ` (5 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Wang Chen This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419 Subject : possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma Submitter : Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Date : 2009-01-08 14:11 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12427] cpumask change causes sparc build bustage 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12428] Build error on latest git Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Miller, Ingo Molnar, Mike Travis This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12427 Subject : cpumask change causes sparc build bustage Submitter : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date : 2009-01-11 8:31 (1 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=588235bb53f2c215f0d4b08fd30b461fedc3338e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166268013838&w=4 Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167571525706&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12428] Build error on latest git 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (11 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12427] cpumask change causes sparc build bustage Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 13:46 ` 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Jaswinder Singh Rajput ` (3 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Petr Titera This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428 Subject : Build error on latest git Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4 Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (12 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12428] Build error on latest git Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 13:46 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput 2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar ` (2 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-11 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Ingo Molnar [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 827 bytes --] On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Regressions with patches > ------------------------ > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428 > Subject : Build error on latest git > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4 > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4 > > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP is defined. I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for x86 Attach patch is the solution for the time being Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue. Thanks -- JSR [-- Attachment #2: 0001-x86-mpparse.c-fix-compilation-error.patch --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 747 bytes --] From 8e7b0d4ea4458f9966c54551ac0bd79b34d5f935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:30:34 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] x86: mpparse.c fix compilation error Impact: fix compilation error Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c index 8385d4e..79dae60 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #include <asm/e820.h> #include <asm/trampoline.h> #include <asm/setup.h> +#include <asm/smp.h> #include <mach_apic.h> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 -- 1.5.6.6 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 2009-01-11 13:46 ` 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-11 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > Regressions with patches > > ------------------------ > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428 > > Subject : Build error on latest git > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4 > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4 > > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP > is defined. > > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for > x86 > > Attach patch is the solution for the time being > > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue. yes, it already is - see below. Ingo -----------------> >From 8b5a33599c541cf5bf66304343d08ff2795d038b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@infradead.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:38:55 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix mpparse.c build error on latest git Fix this by reintroducing asm/smp.h include in mpparse.c - later on I will fix this by removing non-smp data from smp.h. Reported-by: Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> --- arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c index c0601c2..a649a4c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #include <asm/e820.h> #include <asm/trampoline.h> #include <asm/setup.h> +#include <asm/smp.h> #include <mach_apic.h> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-11 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > > > Regressions with patches > > > ------------------------ > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428 > > > Subject : Build error on latest git > > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> > > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4 > > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> > > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4 > > > > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP > > is defined. > > > > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for > > x86 > > > > Attach patch is the solution for the time being > > > > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue. > > yes, it already is - see below. Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the bug when it's merged. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 2009-01-11 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput 2009-01-13 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-13 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List Hello Rafael, On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: >> > > >> > > Regressions with patches >> > > ------------------------ >> > > >> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428 >> > > Subject : Build error on latest git >> > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> >> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old) >> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4 >> > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> >> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4 >> > >> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP >> > is defined. >> > >> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for >> > x86 >> > >> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being >> > >> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue. >> >> yes, it already is - see below. > > Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the > bug when it's merged. > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4884d8e6a05026ec906355436cea9dc1acb1d09e -- JSR ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-13 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-13 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Cc: Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > Hello Rafael, > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > >> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Regressions with patches > >> > > ------------------------ > >> > > > >> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428 > >> > > Subject : Build error on latest git > >> > > Submitter : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> > >> > > Date : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old) > >> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4 > >> > > Handled-By : Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz> > >> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4 > >> > > >> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP > >> > is defined. > >> > > >> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for > >> > x86 > >> > > >> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being > >> > > >> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue. > >> > >> yes, it already is - see below. > > > > Link to this patch was added to the bug entry. Pleaes let me know or close the > > bug when it's merged. > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4884d8e6a05026ec906355436cea9dc1acb1d09e Thanks, the bug has been closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 13:46 ` 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-11 14:22 ` Matthias Heinz 2009-01-11 14:39 ` Matthias Heinz 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420 > Subject : WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() > Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > Date : 2009-01-09 12:34 (3 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=871af1210f13966ab911ed2166e4ab2ce775b99d > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150457832109&w=4 I can trigger it too and it is pretty much resolved - false positive WARN_ON() triggered by new (but correct) libata usage. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417 > Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" > Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> > Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (6 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3 > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4 > Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Should be solved by Venki's PAT fixes in tip/x86/urgent: 0e95c19: x86, pat: fix reserve_memtype() for legacy 1MB range 74edd61: x86 PAT: remove CPA WARN_ON for zero pte e722dc8: x86 PAT: ioremap_wc should take resource_size_t parameter b61e53c: x86 PAT: return compatible mapping to remap_pfn_range callers e104ba3: x86 PAT: change track_pfn_vma_new to take pgprot_t pointer param 3cedb0d: x86 PAT: consolidate old memtype new memtype check into a function e61304a: x86 PAT: remove PFNMAP type on track_pfn_vma_new() error Soon to be sent to Linus. Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2009-01-11 14:22 ` Matthias Heinz 2009-01-11 14:39 ` Matthias Heinz 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Matthias Heinz @ 2009-01-11 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List Am Sonntag, 11. Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me > know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any > of the entries below are invalid. Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12174 Subject : No backlight control on Samsung x360 I think this is a common bug on systems with a broken(?) bios, exposing wrong driver names. With 2.6.27 it was at least possible to control the backlight over the NVID interface. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (15 preceding siblings ...) 2009-01-11 14:22 ` Matthias Heinz @ 2009-01-11 14:39 ` Matthias Heinz 16 siblings, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Matthias Heinz @ 2009-01-11 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List Am Sonntag, 11. Januar 2009 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me > know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any > of the entries below are invalid. Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12174 Subject : No backlight control on Samsung x360 I think this is a common bug on systems with a broken(?) bios, exposing wrong driver names. With 2.6.27 it was at least possible to control the backlight over the NVID interface. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* 2.6.29-rc2-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 @ 2009-01-19 21:28 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-19 21:32 ` [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-19 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.28, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-01-20 38 35 27 2009-01-11 13 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12511 Subject : WARNING: at drivers/dma/dmaengine.c:352 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2009-01-19 21:31 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123240070614443&w=4 Handled-By : Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12510 Subject : 2.6.29-rc2 dies on startup Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu> Date : 2009-01-19 12:53 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123236969321703&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12508 Subject : "powerpc/pci: Reserve legacy regions on PCI" broke my G3 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-01-17 22:46 (3 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c1f343028d35ba4e88cd4a3c44e0d8b8a84264ee References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123223247325452&w=4 Handled-By : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12507 Subject : e100: netconsole not functional because of missing firmware Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru> Date : 2009-01-17 16:08 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123220854426857&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12506 Subject : Undefined symbols when CONFIG_MFD_PCF50633 is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Date : 2009-01-17 10:56 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123218991104592&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12505 Subject : 2.6.29-rc1 Firefox crashing on page load Submitter : Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com> Date : 2009-01-16 20:56 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123213941914274&w=4 Handled-By : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12504 Subject : 2.6.29-rc1 vs selinux Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-16 8:21 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123209412832287&w=4 Handled-By : Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12503 Subject : [slab corruption] BUG key_jar: Poison overwritten Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2009-01-15 18:16 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123204353425825&w=4 Handled-By : David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12502 Subject : pipe_read oops on sh Submitter : Adrian McMenamin <lkmladrian@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-15 9:48 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123201298005600&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501 Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (6 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499 Subject : Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-13 18:34 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123187185426236&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12498 Subject : OOPS and panic on 2.6.29-rc1 on xen-x86 Submitter : Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-12 17:26 (8 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e97a630eb0f5b8b380fd67504de6cedebb489003 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123178178029065&w=4 Handled-By : Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497 Subject : new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1 Submitter : Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Date : 2009-01-12 15:46 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4 Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 Subject : Sony backlight regression from 2.6.28 to 29-rc Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2009-01-19 8:14 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=123235286829512&w=4 Handled-By : Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12491 Subject : i915 lockdep warning Submitter : Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Date : 2009-01-13 23:17 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123188898423532&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490 Subject : ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1 Submitter : Sergey S. Kostyliov <rathamahata@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-12 7:38 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123174591509586&w=4 Handled-By : Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12469 Subject : XFS : Corruption of in-memory data Submitter : Haphaeu <phreytaz@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-17 10:57 (3 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12468 Subject : Crash in acpi_cpufreq_init Submitter : Alex Riesen <fork0@users.sf.net> Date : 2009-01-17 10:47 (3 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=50c668d678fd01284799a6e4f1b91829d83cb9ed Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444 Subject : X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected Submitter : Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk> Date : 2009-01-13 14:03 (7 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12441 Subject : Xorg can't use dri on radeon X1950 AGP Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2009-01-13 05:20 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419 Subject : possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma Submitter : Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Date : 2009-01-08 14:11 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418 Subject : Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears Submitter : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Date : 2009-01-07 22:43 (13 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12417 Subject : glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> Date : 2009-01-06 18:46 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5899329b19100c0b82dc78e9b21ed8b920c9ffb3 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123126782822696&w=4 Handled-By : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12416 Subject : Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Date : 2009-01-06 15:15 (14 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123125495000603&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12415 Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Date : 2009-01-05 10:36 (15 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123115178019082&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414 Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (15 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12402 Subject : 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-09 04:41 (11 days old) References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general/27548 Handled-By : Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12509 Subject : lockdep report. fb_mmap vs sys_mmap2 Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2009-01-17 18:19 (3 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/17/176 Handled-By : Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123231032115956&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12496 Subject : swsusp cannot find resume device (sometimes) Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2009-01-09 12:24 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123150395731165&w=4 Handled-By : Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123156441218358&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=123156453100002&r=1&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12495 Subject : thinkpad problems during resume Submitter : Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Date : 2009-01-17 15:48 (3 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e39ad415ac15116df213dfa2aa2a4f1b0857af9c References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123220746125479&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123170361827197&w=4 Handled-By : Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/16/375 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/16/376 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/16/378 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12493 Subject : ACPI related kernel panic when booting 2.6.29-rc2 Submitter : Peter Klotz <peter.klotz@aon.at> Date : 2009-01-17 20:47 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=123222565017047&w=4 Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com> Tero Roponen <tero.roponen@gmail.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=123223261225680&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12427 Subject : cpumask change causes sparc build bustage Submitter : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date : 2009-01-11 8:31 (9 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=588235bb53f2c215f0d4b08fd30b461fedc3338e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166268013838&w=4 Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167571525706&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (10 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/144 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12400 Subject : git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup Submitter : Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> Date : 2009-01-08 20:05 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123144520124853&w=4 Handled-By : Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123152033725557&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12399 Subject : USB wakeup problem on multiple machines Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2009-01-08 7:35 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fd9086a518d4f14213a32fe6c9ac17fabebbc1e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123140019117968&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=123186456612410&w=4 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.28, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12398 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-19 21:28 2.6.29-rc2-git1: " Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-19 21:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-20 0:39 ` Harvey Harrison 2009-01-20 1:46 ` Jeff Chua 0 siblings, 2 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-19 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Daniel Drake, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Jeff Chua, Phil Dibowitz, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (10 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/144 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-19 21:32 ` [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-01-20 0:39 ` Harvey Harrison 2009-01-20 1:46 ` Jeff Chua 1 sibling, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Harvey Harrison @ 2009-01-20 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Daniel Drake, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Jeff Chua, Phil Dibowitz On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 22:32 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (10 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703 > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=4 > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/144 > The above referenced patch fixes STR for me. Tested-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str 2009-01-19 21:32 ` [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-20 0:39 ` Harvey Harrison @ 2009-01-20 1:46 ` Jeff Chua 1 sibling, 0 replies; 55+ messages in thread From: Jeff Chua @ 2009-01-20 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Daniel Drake, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Phil Dibowitz, Harvey Harrison On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (10 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703 > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=4 > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/144 Rafael, Confirmed the patch fixed resume from STR. No problem for the past 10 days. Thanks, Jeff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 55+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-20 1:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-01-11 11:12 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:12 ` [Bug #12399] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 21:14 ` Maxim Levitsky 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3" Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-14 7:38 ` Alexey Fisher 2009-01-14 7:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12402] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12400] git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 18:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12415] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:689 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-12 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-12 12:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-18 15:49 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12416] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750() Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 14:52 ` Alexey Fisher 2009-01-14 7:35 ` Alexey Rempel 2009-01-14 7:40 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-14 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 13:57 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 14:08 ` Daniel Drake 2009-01-11 14:18 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 16:13 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 16:18 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 16:29 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-11 16:36 ` Christian Borntraeger 2009-01-11 16:39 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-11 16:56 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 18:07 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-13 1:20 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-13 1:28 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-13 2:08 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-01-13 4:28 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-13 5:47 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-13 11:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-13 13:30 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 16:10 ` Jeff Chua 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12427] cpumask change causes sparc build bustage Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 11:16 ` [Bug #12428] Build error on latest git Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 13:46 ` 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Jaswinder Singh Rajput 2009-01-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-11 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-13 3:24 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput 2009-01-13 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-11 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-01-11 14:22 ` Matthias Heinz 2009-01-11 14:39 ` Matthias Heinz 2009-01-19 21:28 2.6.29-rc2-git1: " Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-19 21:32 ` [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-01-20 0:39 ` Harvey Harrison 2009-01-20 1:46 ` Jeff Chua
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).