From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Mike Brady <mikebrady@eircom.net>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, julia.lawall@lip6.fr,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eric@anholt.net, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
nishka.dasgupta_ug18@ashoka.edu.in,
Kirill Marinushkin <k.marinushkin@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] staging: bcm2835-audio: interpolate audio delay
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 17:11:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hsh0f1p30.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C35AD288-063F-4197-A758-450CBB3B1184@eircom.net>
On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:57:07 +0100,
Mike Brady wrote:
>
> > One another thing I'd like to point out is that the value given in the
> > patch is nothing but an estimated position, optimistically calculated
> > via the system timer. Mike and I had already discussion in another
> > thread, and another possible option would be to provide the proper
> > timestamp-vs-hwptr pair, instead of updating the timestamp always at
> > the status read.
>
> Agreed — that would give the caller the information needed to do the
> interpolation for themselves if desired.
And now I wonder whether the problem is still present with the latest
code. There was a (kind of) regression in this regard when we
introduced the fine-grained hardware timestamping, but it should have
been addressed by the commit 20e3f985bb875fea4f86b04eba4b6cc29bfd6b71
ALSA: pcm: update tstamp only if audio_tstamp changed
Could you double-check whether the tstamp field gets still updated
even if no hwptr (and delay) is changed?
thanks,
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-05 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-18 10:57 [PATCH] staging: bcm2835-audio: interpolate audio delay Mike Brady
2018-10-18 11:02 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-10-18 19:48 ` Kirill Marinushkin
2018-10-22 19:08 ` Mike Brady
2018-10-22 19:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Brady
2018-10-22 22:25 ` Kirill Marinushkin
2018-10-24 8:20 ` [alsa-devel] " Mike Brady
2018-10-24 18:06 ` Kirill Marinushkin
2018-10-24 19:54 ` Mike Brady
2018-10-24 22:02 ` Kirill Marinushkin
2018-10-25 7:37 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-10-25 17:20 ` Kirill Marinushkin
2018-10-28 14:24 ` Mike Brady
2018-10-28 14:26 ` Mike Brady
2018-11-05 15:57 ` Mike Brady
2018-11-05 16:11 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2018-11-06 21:05 ` Mike Brady
2018-11-06 21:31 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-11-11 18:08 ` Mike Brady
2018-11-11 18:21 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: " Mike Brady
2018-11-11 20:18 ` Stefan Wahren
2018-11-13 16:50 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-01 10:02 ` Mike Brady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hsh0f1p30.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=k.marinushkin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mikebrady@eircom.net \
--cc=nishka.dasgupta_ug18@ashoka.edu.in \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).