linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bp@alien8.de, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
	neil.berrington@datacore.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/64: Tighten up vmalloc_fault() sanity checks on 5-level kernels
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 07:07:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-36b3a7726886f24c4209852a58e64435bde3af98@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ae598f8c279b0a29baf75df207e6f2fdddc0a1b.1516914529.git.luto@kernel.org>

Commit-ID:  36b3a7726886f24c4209852a58e64435bde3af98
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/36b3a7726886f24c4209852a58e64435bde3af98
Author:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:12:15 -0800
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:56:23 +0100

x86/mm/64: Tighten up vmalloc_fault() sanity checks on 5-level kernels

On a 5-level kernel, if a non-init mm has a top-level entry, it needs to
match init_mm's, but the vmalloc_fault() code skipped over the BUG_ON()
that would have checked it.

While we're at it, get rid of the rather confusing 4-level folded "pgd"
logic.

Cleans-up: b50858ce3e2a ("x86/mm/vmalloc: Add 5-level paging support")
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Neil Berrington <neil.berrington@datacore.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2ae598f8c279b0a29baf75df207e6f2fdddc0a1b.1516914529.git.luto@kernel.org

---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index b3e4077..800de81 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -439,18 +439,13 @@ static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
 	if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref))
 		return -1;
 
-	if (pgd_none(*pgd)) {
-		set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_ref);
-		arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
-	} else if (CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 4) {
-		/*
-		 * With folded p4d, pgd_none() is always false, so the pgd may
-		 * point to an empty page table entry and pgd_page_vaddr()
-		 * will return garbage.
-		 *
-		 * We will do the correct sanity check on the p4d level.
-		 */
-		BUG_ON(pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd) != pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd_ref));
+	if (CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 4) {
+		if (pgd_none(*pgd)) {
+			set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_ref);
+			arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
+		} else {
+			BUG_ON(pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd) != pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd_ref));
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* With 4-level paging, copying happens on the p4d level. */
@@ -459,7 +454,7 @@ static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
 	if (p4d_none(*p4d_ref))
 		return -1;
 
-	if (p4d_none(*p4d)) {
+	if (p4d_none(*p4d) && CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 4) {
 		set_p4d(p4d, *p4d_ref);
 		arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
 	} else {
@@ -470,6 +465,7 @@ static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
 	 * Below here mismatches are bugs because these lower tables
 	 * are shared:
 	 */
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS < 4);
 
 	pud = pud_offset(p4d, address);
 	pud_ref = pud_offset(p4d_ref, address);

      reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-25 21:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/mm/64: vmalloc pgd synchronization cleanups/fixes Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-25 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/mm/64: Fix vmapped stack syncing on very-large-memory 4-level systems Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-25 21:49   ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-25 22:00     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-26  9:30       ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-26 18:54       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-01-26 15:06   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-26 18:51   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-01-26 19:02     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-26 20:50       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-01-25 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mm/64: Tighten up vmalloc_fault() sanity checks on 5-level kernels Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-26 15:07   ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-36b3a7726886f24c4209852a58e64435bde3af98@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.berrington@datacore.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).