linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/1] x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical
@ 2019-03-26  0:18 rcampbell
  2019-03-26  0:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses rcampbell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: rcampbell @ 2019-03-26  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Ralph Campbell, Craig Bergstrom, Linus Torvalds, Boris Ostrovsky,
	Fengguang Wu, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Hans Verkuil,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Peter Zijlstra, Sander Eikelenboom,
	Sean Young, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar

From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>

I was debugging with v5.1.0-rc1 and while booting I hit a
kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:27
which I fixed with the following patch but now I can't seem
to reproduce the exact setup that triggered it.
Still, it seems like a valid problem and maybe my difficulty
in reproducing it explains why others haven't seen it earlier.

Changes from v1 to v2:
 * Updated the change log and patch as suggested by Thomas Gleixner.

Ralph Campbell (1):
  x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses

 arch/x86/mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses
  2019-03-26  0:18 [PATCH v2 0/1] x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical rcampbell
@ 2019-03-26  0:18 ` rcampbell
  2019-03-28 13:16   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Don't exceed the valid physical address space tip-bot for Ralph Campbell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: rcampbell @ 2019-03-26  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Ralph Campbell, Craig Bergstrom, Linus Torvalds, Boris Ostrovsky,
	Fengguang Wu, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Hans Verkuil,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Peter Zijlstra, Sander Eikelenboom,
	Sean Young, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar

From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>

valid_phys_addr_range() is used to sanity check the physical address range
of an operation, e.g., access to /dev/mem. It uses __pa(high_memory)
internally.

If memory is populated at the end of the physical address space, then
__pa(high_memory) is outside of the physical address space because:

   high_memory = (void *)__va(max_pfn * PAGE_SIZE - 1) + 1;

For the comparison in valid_phys_addr_range() this is not an issue, but if
CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is enabled, __pa() maps to __phys_addr(), which
verifies that the resulting physical address is within the valid physical
address space of the CPU. So in the case that memory is populated at the
end of the physical address space, this is not true and triggers a
VIRTUAL_BUG_ON().

Use __pa(high_memory - 1) to prevent the conversion from going beyond
the end of valid physical addresses.

Fixes: be62a3204406 ("x86/mm: Limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses")
Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Craig Bergstrom <craigb@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
index db3165714521..196bed43d5e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ bool mmap_address_hint_valid(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len)
 /* Can we access it for direct reading/writing? Must be RAM: */
 int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t count)
 {
-	return addr + count <= __pa(high_memory);
+	return addr + count - 1 <= __pa(high_memory - 1);
 }
 
 /* Can we access it through mmap? Must be a valid physical address: */
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Don't exceed the valid physical address space
  2019-03-26  0:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses rcampbell
@ 2019-03-28 13:16   ` tip-bot for Ralph Campbell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Ralph Campbell @ 2019-03-28 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: rcampbell, linux, boris.ostrovsky, mchehab, linux-kernel,
	hans.verkuil, mingo, tglx, craigb, hpa, torvalds, sean,
	fengguang.wu, peterz, gregkh

Commit-ID:  92c77f7c4d5dfaaf45b2ce19360e69977c264766
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/92c77f7c4d5dfaaf45b2ce19360e69977c264766
Author:     Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:18:17 -0700
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:13:51 +0100

x86/mm: Don't exceed the valid physical address space

valid_phys_addr_range() is used to sanity check the physical address range
of an operation, e.g., access to /dev/mem. It uses __pa(high_memory)
internally.

If memory is populated at the end of the physical address space, then
__pa(high_memory) is outside of the physical address space because:

   high_memory = (void *)__va(max_pfn * PAGE_SIZE - 1) + 1;

For the comparison in valid_phys_addr_range() this is not an issue, but if
CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is enabled, __pa() maps to __phys_addr(), which
verifies that the resulting physical address is within the valid physical
address space of the CPU. So in the case that memory is populated at the
end of the physical address space, this is not true and triggers a
VIRTUAL_BUG_ON().

Use __pa(high_memory - 1) to prevent the conversion from going beyond
the end of valid physical addresses.

Fixes: be62a3204406 ("x86/mm: Limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses")
Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Craig Bergstrom <craigb@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190326001817.15413-2-rcampbell@nvidia.com

---
 arch/x86/mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
index db3165714521..dc726e07d8ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ bool mmap_address_hint_valid(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len)
 /* Can we access it for direct reading/writing? Must be RAM: */
 int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t count)
 {
-	return addr + count <= __pa(high_memory);
+	return addr + count - 1 <= __pa(high_memory - 1);
 }
 
 /* Can we access it through mmap? Must be a valid physical address: */

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-03-28 13:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-26  0:18 [PATCH v2 0/1] x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical rcampbell
2019-03-26  0:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses rcampbell
2019-03-28 13:16   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Don't exceed the valid physical address space tip-bot for Ralph Campbell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).