linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Dongsu Park <dpark@posteo.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>,
	drbd-user@lists.linbit.com, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>, Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>,
	Joshua Morris <josh.h.morris@us.ibm.com>,
	Philip Kelleher <pjk1939@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:58:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49k2w3oz32.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1ivSbdbvnCi04oR9h4sqnMcLFNXfOo-8=_2qFVkzNYmnmELQ@mail.gmail.com> (Ming Lin's message of "Wed, 20 May 2015 11:30:10 -0700")

Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org> writes:

> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>>> index fd154b9..909f317 100644
>>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>>> @@ -617,6 +617,10 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue_node(gfp_t gfp_mask, int node_id)
>>>       if (q->id < 0)
>>>               goto fail_q;
>>>
>>> +     q->bio_split = bioset_create(4, 0);
>>> +     if (!q->bio_split)
>>> +             goto fail_id;
>>> +
>>
>> Arbitrary numbers should be documented.
>
> Kent,
>
> Is there specific reason to choose number 4?
> If no, I may change it to BIO_POOL_SIZE which is 2.

Here's what he had to say last time around:

  On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:21PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
  > > +   q->bio_split = bioset_create(4, 0);
  > > +   if (!q->bio_split)
  > > +      goto fail_id;
  > 
  > How did we arrive at a mempool size of 4 to make sure we can always make
  > progress with arbitrarily sized bios?  Shouldn't we document the design
  > decision somewhere?

  It just has to be nonzero to guarantee forward progress - the
  bio_alloc_bioset() rescuer thing I did awhile back guarantees that.

link:  https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/47

Cheers,
Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-20 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-07  6:34 [PATCH v3 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios Ming Lin
2015-05-18 16:52   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-05-18 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-22  7:51       ` Ming Lin
2015-05-20 18:30     ` Ming Lin
2015-05-20 18:58       ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2015-05-20 20:18         ` Ming Lin
2015-05-22 17:49     ` Ming Lin
2015-05-20 12:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-20 18:16     ` Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] block: simplify bio_add_page() Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] block: allow __blk_queue_bounce() to handle bios larger than BIO_MAX_PAGES Ming Lin
2015-05-19  8:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-20 18:17     ` Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] bcache: remove driver private bio splitting code Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] btrfs: remove bio splitting and merge_bvec_fn() calls Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits_rdev() Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] md/raid5: split bio for chunk_aligned_read Ming Lin
2015-05-08  4:14   ` NeilBrown
2015-05-08  5:57     ` Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] block: kill merge_bvec_fn() completely Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] fs: use helper bio_add_page() instead of open coding on bi_io_vec Ming Lin
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] md/raid10: make sync_request_write() call bio_copy_data() Ming Lin
2015-05-19  8:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-20  3:09     ` NeilBrown
2015-05-07  6:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] Documentation: update notes in biovecs about arbitrarily sized bios Ming Lin
2015-05-18 16:13 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-20 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-20 18:10   ` Ming Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49k2w3oz32.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpark@posteo.net \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=drbd-user@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jim@jtan.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=josh.h.morris@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=mlin@kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    --cc=pjk1939@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).