[PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries

[PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries

[Christoph Hellwig]

The open-osd domain doesn't exist anymore, and mails to the list lead
to really annoying bounced that repeat every day.

Also the primarydata address for Benny bounces, and while I have a new
one for him he doesn't seem to be maintaining the OSD code any more.

Which beggs the question:  should we really leave the Supported status
in MAINTAINERS given that the code is barely maintained?

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 1bb06c5f7716..28dd83a1d9e2 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -9418,10 +9418,6 @@ F:	drivers/net/wireless/intersil/orinoco/
 
 OSD LIBRARY and FILESYSTEM
 M:	Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>
-M:	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
-L:	osd-dev@open-osd.org
-W:	http://open-osd.org
-T:	git git://git.open-osd.org/open-osd.git
 S:	Maintained
 F:	drivers/scsi/osd/
 F:	include/scsi/osd_*
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries

[Jeff Layton]

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:57 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The open-osd domain doesn't exist anymore, and mails to the list lead
> to really annoying bounced that repeat every day.
> 
> Also the primarydata address for Benny bounces, and while I have a new
> one for him he doesn't seem to be maintaining the OSD code any more.
> 
> Which beggs the question:  should we really leave the Supported status
> in MAINTAINERS given that the code is barely maintained?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1bb06c5f7716..28dd83a1d9e2 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -9418,10 +9418,6 @@ F:	drivers/net/wireless/intersil/orinoco/
>  
>  OSD LIBRARY and FILESYSTEM
>  M:	Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>
> -M:	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
> -L:	osd-dev@open-osd.org
> -W:	http://open-osd.org
> -T:	git git://git.open-osd.org/open-osd.git
>  S:	Maintained
>  F:	drivers/scsi/osd/
>  F:	include/scsi/osd_*

Hah, you beat me to it! I was going to spin up a patch for this today.

Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

Re: [PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries

[Boaz Harrosh]

On 05/02/2017 02:33 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:57 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> The open-osd domain doesn't exist anymore, and mails to the list lead
>> to really annoying bounced that repeat every day.
>>
>> Also the primarydata address for Benny bounces, and while I have a new
>> one for him he doesn't seem to be maintaining the OSD code any more.
>>
>> Which beggs the question:  should we really leave the Supported status
>> in MAINTAINERS given that the code is barely maintained?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 4 ----
>>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 1bb06c5f7716..28dd83a1d9e2 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -9418,10 +9418,6 @@ F:	drivers/net/wireless/intersil/orinoco/
>>  
>>  OSD LIBRARY and FILESYSTEM
>>  M:	Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>
>> -M:	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
>> -L:	osd-dev@open-osd.org
>> -W:	http://open-osd.org
>> -T:	git git://git.open-osd.org/open-osd.git
>>  S:	Maintained
>>  F:	drivers/scsi/osd/
>>  F:	include/scsi/osd_*
> 
> Hah, you beat me to it! I was going to spin up a patch for this today.
> 
> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>

> 

Re: [PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries

[Benny Halevy]

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com> wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2017 02:33 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:57 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> The open-osd domain doesn't exist anymore, and mails to the list lead
> >> to really annoying bounced that repeat every day.
> >>
> >> Also the primarydata address for Benny bounces, and while I have a new
> >> one for him he doesn't seem to be maintaining the OSD code any more.
> >>
> >> Which beggs the question:  should we really leave the Supported status
> >> in MAINTAINERS given that the code is barely maintained?
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> >> ---
> >>  MAINTAINERS | 4 ----
> >>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >> index 1bb06c5f7716..28dd83a1d9e2 100644
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -9418,10 +9418,6 @@ F:    drivers/net/wireless/intersil/orinoco/
> >>
> >>  OSD LIBRARY and FILESYSTEM
> >>  M:  Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>
> >> -M:  Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
> >> -L:  osd-dev@open-osd.org
> >> -W:  http://open-osd.org
> >> -T:  git git://git.open-osd.org/open-osd.git
> >>  S:  Maintained
> >>  F:  drivers/scsi/osd/
> >>  F:  include/scsi/osd_*
> >
> > Hah, you beat me to it! I was going to spin up a patch for this today.
> >
> > Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
>
> Acked-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>

Acked-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@gmail.com>

>
> >
>

Re: [PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries

[Martin K. Petersen]

Christoph,

> The open-osd domain doesn't exist anymore, and mails to the list lead
> to really annoying bounced that repeat every day.
>
> Also the primarydata address for Benny bounces, and while I have a new
> one for him he doesn't seem to be maintaining the OSD code any more.
>
> Which beggs the question: should we really leave the Supported status
> in MAINTAINERS given that the code is barely maintained?

Applied to 4.12/scsi-fixes.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering