linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (Måns Rullgård)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:37:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1x65lndji9.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1059385080.574.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com

Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org> writes:

>> > It is interesting that Felipe says that stock 2.5.69 was the best CPU
>> > scheduler of the 2.5 series.  Do others agree with that?
>
>> No.
>> For me, 2.5.63 was the best. Or perhaps it was .64 or .65?
>
> Well, for me now, the best scheduler is 2.6.0-test2 plus Con's O10
> patch.

Could someone give a brief comparison between Con's O10int and Ingo's
G7 patches?

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@users.sf.net


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-28 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-26  9:30 Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-26  9:46 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-26 10:02   ` Ismael Valladolid Torres
2003-07-26 10:10     ` Eugene Teo
2003-07-26 11:24       ` Ed Sweetman
2003-07-26 17:00         ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 15:46         ` Daniel Phillips
2003-07-26 16:52           ` Diego Calleja García
2003-07-26 18:35           ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-26 23:01             ` Diego Calleja García
2003-07-28  9:38               ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-28 10:37                 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2003-07-28 17:06                 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-07-27  2:38             ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-27  7:39               ` Willy Tarreau
2003-07-27  9:12                 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-07-27 11:54                   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-27 20:18             ` Daniel Phillips
2003-07-26 22:05               ` Ed Sweetman
2003-08-01 15:38                 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-07-31 23:02                   ` Ed Sweetman
2003-07-27  2:39               ` Ed Sweetman
2003-07-29 13:56               ` Timothy Miller
2003-07-29 13:57                 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-29 15:30                   ` Timothy Miller
2003-07-29 15:52                 ` Helge Hafting
2003-07-29 16:26                   ` Timothy Miller
2003-07-30 14:46                 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-07-29 15:40                   ` Timothy Miller
2003-07-30 16:17                     ` Daniel Phillips
2003-08-08 21:09                   ` Bill Huey
2003-08-06 21:28           ` Rob Landley
2003-08-07  9:34             ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-07 15:42             ` Daniel Phillips
2003-08-07 20:45               ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-07 20:51               ` Rob Landley
2003-08-07 21:40                 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-08-07 22:17                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-08  0:01                   ` Rob Landley
2003-08-09 20:52                   ` George Anzinger
2003-08-14  0:24                     ` Rob Landley
2003-08-14  8:01                       ` George Anzinger
2003-08-16  9:10                         ` Rob Landley
2003-08-16 14:29                           ` APM and 2.5.75 not resuming properly Jamie Lokier
2003-08-16 15:03                             ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-08-16 16:12                               ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-16 20:43                             ` Rob Landley
2003-08-13  3:38                   ` Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches George Anzinger
2003-08-08  6:08                 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-07-26 12:08       ` Ismael Valladolid Torres
2003-07-26 14:54         ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-26 14:49     ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-26 14:47   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-26 16:42     ` Lou Langholtz
2003-07-26 16:40       ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-26 18:19   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-26 18:31     ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-26 19:20       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-26 19:47       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-27  9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-07-27  9:57   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-27 10:02     ` Ingo Molnar
2003-07-27 10:19       ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-28 22:44     ` Timothy Miller
2003-07-26 14:44 Downing, Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yw1x65lndji9.fsf@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=mru@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).