Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] utime03.c: Fix filesystem name

From: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] utime03.c: Fix filesystem name
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:23:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEemH2ddzfJ48prJTejCBq-=u4O-w0ENR27A_DjUo_OsqShCow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220114210034.16177-1-pvorel@suse.cz>

Hi Petr,

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 5:00 AM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Use the same name as in tst_fs_type_name() to actually skip it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> "v9fs is a Unix implementation of the Plan 9 9p remote filesystem
> protocol." [1]
>
> NOTE: filesystem is called v9fs, but mount parameter is "9p"
> that's probably the reason why named "9p" and not "v9" in
> tst_fs_type_name().
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/9p.html
>
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/utime/utime03.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/utime/utime03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/utime/utime03.c
> index 48cc3bae77..823bc5f72a 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/utime/utime03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/utime/utime03.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
>         .mntpoint = MNTPOINT,
>         .all_filesystems = 1,
>         .skip_filesystems = (const char *const[]) {
> -               "v9",
> +               "9p",

I'm wondering does it really take effect with whatever "v9" or "9p"?
Because the fs_type_whitelist[] does not include any of them.

>                 "vfat",
>                 "exfat",
>                 NULL
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp