ltp.lists.linux.it archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
	Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 10/10] syscalls/fanotify20: Test capture of multiple errors
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:00:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxia5Qhieui+keBLumWwGd2+wv88+FykWq-zMrDrHmZUrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026184239.151156-11-krisman@collabora.com>

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 9:44 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
<krisman@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> When multiple FS errors occur, only the first is stored.  This testcase
> validates this behavior by issuing two different errors and making sure
> only the first is stored, while the second is simply accumulated in
> error_count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>

Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>

> ---
>  .../kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c     | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> index 7bcddcaa98cb..0083a018f2c6 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,18 @@ static void tcase2_trigger_lookup(void)
>                         ret, BAD_DIR, errno, EUCLEAN);
>  }
>
> +static void tcase3_trigger(void)
> +{
> +       trigger_fs_abort();
> +       tcase2_trigger_lookup();

So after remount,abort filesystem operations can still be executed?
Then I guess my comment from the previous patch about running the test in a loop
is not relevant?

Thanks,
Amir.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-27 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-26 18:42 [LTP] [PATCH v2 00/10] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 01/10] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific mark types Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27  6:10   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 02/10] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific events Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27  6:23   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 03/10] syscalls/fanotify20: Introduce helpers for FAN_FS_ERROR test Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27  6:33   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 04/10] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate the generic error info Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27  6:43   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-27 10:19     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 05/10] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27  6:48   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 06/10] syscalls/fanotify20: Support submission of debugfs commands Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27  6:49   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 07/10] syscalls/fanotify20: Create a corrupted file Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27  6:51   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 08/10] syscalls/fanotify20: Test event after filesystem abort Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27  9:56   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 09/10] syscalls/fanotify20: Test file event with broken inode Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27  9:57   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-10-26 18:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 10/10] syscalls/fanotify20: Test capture of multiple errors Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-10-27 10:00   ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2021-10-29 15:03     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOQ4uxia5Qhieui+keBLumWwGd2+wv88+FykWq-zMrDrHmZUrA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=khazhy@google.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=repnop@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).