lttng-dev.lists.lttng.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: Rocky Dunlap <dunlap@ucar.edu>
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Subject: Re: Babeltrace2 - compilation error with intel18
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:44:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c4447ea-b67a-eaf0-c9dd-d2c10106b5a7@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bc0ec69-7587-fe58-691f-5cb23a11cd43@simark.ca>

On 2020-03-20 11:12 p.m., Simon Marchi via lttng-dev wrote:
> So since distutils really wants to compile the Python native modules using all the same
> flags as the Python interpreter was built with, I presume that they really assume that
> you'll be using the exact same toolchain to build your module as was used to build the
> interpreter.  Maybe we could just not pass CC/CFLAGS when building the Python module,
> so it will simply be built with the same compiler/linker as Python was built with, and
> we'll avoid all these problems...

If we want to go this route, here's a patch that implements it.

  https://review.lttng.org/c/babeltrace/+/3257

This makes it so we don't override the compiler or flags (other than necessary includes
flags) when building the native module.  So when configuring with CC=clang, the Python
native module gets built with the Python distribution's default compiler, with just the
flags it wants.

Could you check if that works with CC=icc as well?

Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-23 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-20 21:10 Babeltrace2 - compilation error with intel18 Rocky Dunlap via lttng-dev
2020-03-20 21:47 ` Simon Marchi via lttng-dev
2020-03-20 21:55   ` Rocky Dunlap via lttng-dev
2020-03-20 22:20     ` Simon Marchi via lttng-dev
2020-03-20 22:32       ` Rocky Dunlap via lttng-dev
2020-03-21  3:12         ` Simon Marchi via lttng-dev
2020-03-23 15:44           ` Simon Marchi via lttng-dev [this message]
2020-03-23 16:05             ` Rocky Dunlap via lttng-dev
2020-03-23 16:14               ` Simon Marchi via lttng-dev
2020-03-23 16:56                 ` Rocky Dunlap via lttng-dev
2020-03-23 17:24                   ` Simon Marchi via lttng-dev
2020-03-23 17:37                     ` Rocky Dunlap via lttng-dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1c4447ea-b67a-eaf0-c9dd-d2c10106b5a7@simark.ca \
    --to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=dunlap@ucar.edu \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).