[merged] userfaultfd-wp-declare-_uffdio_writeprotect-conditionally.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged] userfaultfd-wp-declare-_uffdio_writeprotect-conditionally.patch removed from -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: userfaultfd: wp: declare _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT conditionally
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     userfaultfd-wp-declare-_uffdio_writeprotect-conditionally.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: userfaultfd: wp: declare _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT conditionally

Only declare _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT if the user specified
UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP and if all the checks passed.  Then when the user
registers regions with shmem/hugetlbfs we won't expose the new ioctl to
them.  Even with complete anonymous memory range, we'll only expose the
new WP ioctl bit if the register mode has MODE_WP.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-18-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>
Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov>
Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/userfaultfd.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd-wp-declare-_uffdio_writeprotect-conditionally
+++ a/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1495,14 +1495,24 @@ out_unlock:
 	up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
 	mmput(mm);
 	if (!ret) {
+		__u64 ioctls_out;
+
+		ioctls_out = basic_ioctls ? UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC :
+		    UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS;
+
+		/*
+		 * Declare the WP ioctl only if the WP mode is
+		 * specified and all checks passed with the range
+		 */
+		if (!(uffdio_register.mode & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP))
+			ioctls_out &= ~((__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT);
+
 		/*
 		 * Now that we scanned all vmas we can already tell
 		 * userland which ioctls methods are guaranteed to
 		 * succeed on this range.
 		 */
-		if (put_user(basic_ioctls ? UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC :
-			     UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS,
-			     &user_uffdio_register->ioctls))
+		if (put_user(ioctls_out, &user_uffdio_register->ioctls))
 			ret = -EFAULT;
 	}
 out:
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from peterx@redhat.com are

mm-mempolicy-allow-lookup_node-to-handle-fatal-signal.patch
mm-gup-mark-lock-taken-only-after-a-successful-retake.patch