* + powerpc-spufs-stop-using-access_ok.patch added to -mm tree
@ 2020-05-05 19:29 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: akpm @ 2020-05-05 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: arnd, benh, ebiederm, hch, jk, mm-commits, mpe, oleg, paulus, viro
The patch titled
Subject: powerpc/spufs: stop using access_ok
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
powerpc-spufs-stop-using-access_ok.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/powerpc-spufs-stop-using-access_ok.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/powerpc-spufs-stop-using-access_ok.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: powerpc/spufs: stop using access_ok
Just use the proper non __-prefixed get/put_user variants where that is
not done yet.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200505101256.3121270-3-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c | 42 ++++-----------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c~powerpc-spufs-stop-using-access_ok
+++ a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c
@@ -590,17 +590,12 @@ static ssize_t spufs_mbox_read(struct fi
size_t len, loff_t *pos)
{
struct spu_context *ctx = file->private_data;
- u32 mbox_data, __user *udata;
+ u32 mbox_data, __user *udata = (void __user *)buf;
ssize_t count;
if (len < 4)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!access_ok(buf, len))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- udata = (void __user *)buf;
-
count = spu_acquire(ctx);
if (count)
return count;
@@ -616,7 +611,7 @@ static ssize_t spufs_mbox_read(struct fi
* but still need to return the data we have
* read successfully so far.
*/
- ret = __put_user(mbox_data, udata);
+ ret = put_user(mbox_data, udata);
if (ret) {
if (!count)
count = -EFAULT;
@@ -698,17 +693,12 @@ static ssize_t spufs_ibox_read(struct fi
size_t len, loff_t *pos)
{
struct spu_context *ctx = file->private_data;
- u32 ibox_data, __user *udata;
+ u32 ibox_data, __user *udata = (void __user *)buf;
ssize_t count;
if (len < 4)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!access_ok(buf, len))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- udata = (void __user *)buf;
-
count = spu_acquire(ctx);
if (count)
goto out;
@@ -727,7 +717,7 @@ static ssize_t spufs_ibox_read(struct fi
}
/* if we can't write at all, return -EFAULT */
- count = __put_user(ibox_data, udata);
+ count = put_user(ibox_data, udata);
if (count)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -741,7 +731,7 @@ static ssize_t spufs_ibox_read(struct fi
* but still need to return the data we have
* read successfully so far.
*/
- ret = __put_user(ibox_data, udata);
+ ret = put_user(ibox_data, udata);
if (ret)
break;
}
@@ -836,17 +826,13 @@ static ssize_t spufs_wbox_write(struct f
size_t len, loff_t *pos)
{
struct spu_context *ctx = file->private_data;
- u32 wbox_data, __user *udata;
+ u32 wbox_data, __user *udata = (void __user *)buf;
ssize_t count;
if (len < 4)
return -EINVAL;
- udata = (void __user *)buf;
- if (!access_ok(buf, len))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- if (__get_user(wbox_data, udata))
+ if (get_user(wbox_data, udata))
return -EFAULT;
count = spu_acquire(ctx);
@@ -873,7 +859,7 @@ static ssize_t spufs_wbox_write(struct f
/* write as much as possible */
for (count = 4, udata++; (count + 4) <= len; count += 4, udata++) {
int ret;
- ret = __get_user(wbox_data, udata);
+ ret = get_user(wbox_data, udata);
if (ret)
break;
@@ -1982,9 +1968,6 @@ static ssize_t spufs_mbox_info_read(stru
u32 stat, data;
int ret;
- if (!access_ok(buf, len))
- return -EFAULT;
-
ret = spu_acquire_saved(ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2028,9 +2011,6 @@ static ssize_t spufs_ibox_info_read(stru
u32 stat, data;
int ret;
- if (!access_ok(buf, len))
- return -EFAULT;
-
ret = spu_acquire_saved(ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2082,9 +2062,6 @@ static ssize_t spufs_wbox_info_read(stru
u32 data[ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->csa.spu_mailbox_data)];
int ret, count;
- if (!access_ok(buf, len))
- return -EFAULT;
-
ret = spu_acquire_saved(ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2143,9 +2120,6 @@ static ssize_t spufs_dma_info_read(struc
struct spu_dma_info info;
int ret;
- if (!access_ok(buf, len))
- return -EFAULT;
-
ret = spu_acquire_saved(ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hch@lst.de are
x86-hyperv-use-vmalloc_exec-for-the-hypercall-page.patch
x86-fix-vmap-arguments-in-map_irq_stack.patch
staging-android-ion-use-vmap-instead-of-vm_map_ram.patch
staging-media-ipu3-use-vmap-instead-of-reimplementing-it.patch
dma-mapping-use-vmap-insted-of-reimplementing-it.patch
powerpc-add-an-ioremap_phb-helper.patch
powerpc-remove-__ioremap_at-and-__iounmap_at.patch
mm-remove-__get_vm_area.patch
mm-unexport-unmap_kernel_range_noflush.patch
mm-rename-config_pgtable_mapping-to-config_zsmalloc_pgtable_mapping.patch
mm-only-allow-page-table-mappings-for-built-in-zsmalloc.patch
mm-pass-addr-as-unsigned-long-to-vb_free.patch
mm-remove-vmap_page_range_noflush-and-vunmap_page_range.patch
mm-rename-vmap_page_range-to-map_kernel_range.patch
mm-dont-return-the-number-of-pages-from-map_kernel_range_noflush.patch
mm-remove-map_vm_range.patch
mm-remove-unmap_vmap_area.patch
mm-remove-the-prot-argument-from-vm_map_ram.patch
mm-enforce-that-vmap-cant-map-pages-executable.patch
gpu-drm-remove-the-powerpc-hack-in-drm_legacy_sg_alloc.patch
mm-remove-the-pgprot-argument-to-__vmalloc.patch
mm-remove-the-prot-argument-to-__vmalloc_node.patch
mm-remove-both-instances-of-__vmalloc_node_flags.patch
mm-remove-__vmalloc_node_flags_caller.patch
mm-switch-the-test_vmalloc-module-to-use-__vmalloc_node.patch
mm-remove-vmalloc_user_node_flags.patch
arm64-use-__vmalloc_node-in-arch_alloc_vmap_stack.patch
powerpc-use-__vmalloc_node-in-alloc_vm_stack.patch
s390-use-__vmalloc_node-in-stack_alloc.patch
powerpc-spufs-stop-using-access_ok.patch
powerpc-spufs-simplify-spufs-core-dumping.patch
signal-refactor-copy_siginfo_to_user32.patch
binfmt_elf-remove-the-set_fskernel_ds-in-elf_core_dump.patch
binfmt_elf_fdpic-remove-the-set_fskernel_ds-in-elf_fdpic_core_dump.patch
exec-simplify-the-copy_strings_kernel-calling-convention.patch
exec-open-code-copy_string_kernel.patch
amdgpu-a-null-mm-does-not-mean-a-thread-is-a-kthread.patch
kernel-move-use_mm-unuse_mm-to-kthreadc.patch
kernel-move-use_mm-unuse_mm-to-kthreadc-v2.patch
kernel-better-document-the-use_mm-unuse_mm-api-contract.patch
kernel-better-document-the-use_mm-unuse_mm-api-contract-v2.patch
kernel-set-user_ds-in-kthread_use_mm.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-05-05 19:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-05 19:29 + powerpc-spufs-stop-using-access_ok.patch added to -mm tree akpm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).