[merged] mm-debug_vm_pgtable-savedwrite-enable-savedwrite-test-with-config_numa_balancing.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged] mm-debug_vm_pgtable-savedwrite-enable-savedwrite-test-with-config_numa_balancing.patch removed from -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm/debug_vm_pgtable/savedwrite: enable savedwrite test with CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-debug_vm_pgtable-savedwrite-enable-savedwrite-test-with-config_numa_balancing.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: mm/debug_vm_pgtable/savedwrite: enable savedwrite test with CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING

Saved write support was added to track the write bit of a pte after
marking the pte protnone.  This was done so that AUTONUMA can convert a
write pte to protnone and still track the old write bit.  When converting
it back we set the pte write bit correctly thereby avoiding a write fault
again.  Hence enable the test only when CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING is enabled
and use protnone protflags.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200902114222.181353-6-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c |   11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c~mm-debug_vm_pgtable-savedwrite-enable-savedwrite-test-with-config_numa_balancing
+++ a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
@@ -119,10 +119,14 @@ static void __init pte_savedwrite_tests(
 {
 	pte_t pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
 
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING))
+		return;
+
 	pr_debug("Validating PTE saved write\n");
 	WARN_ON(!pte_savedwrite(pte_mk_savedwrite(pte_clear_savedwrite(pte))));
 	WARN_ON(pte_savedwrite(pte_clear_savedwrite(pte_mk_savedwrite(pte))));
 }
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
 static void __init pmd_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 {
@@ -234,6 +238,9 @@ static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(
 {
 	pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot);
 
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING))
+		return;
+
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD saved write\n");
 	WARN_ON(!pmd_savedwrite(pmd_mk_savedwrite(pmd_clear_savedwrite(pmd))));
 	WARN_ON(pmd_savedwrite(pmd_clear_savedwrite(pmd_mk_savedwrite(pmd))));
@@ -1019,8 +1026,8 @@ static int __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
 	pmd_huge_tests(pmdp, pmd_aligned, prot);
 	pud_huge_tests(pudp, pud_aligned, prot);
 
-	pte_savedwrite_tests(pte_aligned, prot);
-	pmd_savedwrite_tests(pmd_aligned, prot);
+	pte_savedwrite_tests(pte_aligned, protnone);
+	pmd_savedwrite_tests(pmd_aligned, protnone);
 
 	pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com are