* [merged] mm-page_alloc-convert-report-flag-of-__free_one_page-to-a-proper-flag.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2020-10-16 20:51 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: akpm @ 2020-10-16 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alexander.h.duyck, cheloha, dave.hansen, david, haiyangz, kys,
mgorman, mhocko, mhocko, mm-commits, mpe, osalvador,
pankaj.gupta.linux, richard.weiyang, rppt, sthemmin, vbabka,
wei.liu, willy
The patch titled
Subject: mm/page_alloc: convert "report" flag of __free_one_page() to a proper flag
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-page_alloc-convert-report-flag-of-__free_one_page-to-a-proper-flag.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/page_alloc: convert "report" flag of __free_one_page() to a proper flag
Patch series "mm: place pages to the freelist tail when onlining and undoing isolation", v2.
When adding separate memory blocks via add_memory*() and onlining them
immediately, the metadata (especially the memmap) of the next block will
be placed onto one of the just added+onlined block. This creates a chain
of unmovable allocations: If the last memory block cannot get
offlined+removed() so will all dependent ones. We directly have unmovable
allocations all over the place.
This can be observed quite easily using virtio-mem, however, it can also
be observed when using DIMMs. The freshly onlined pages will usually be
placed to the head of the freelists, meaning they will be allocated next,
turning the just-added memory usually immediately un-removable. The fresh
pages are cold, prefering to allocate others (that might be hot) also
feels to be the natural thing to do.
It also applies to the hyper-v balloon xen-balloon, and ppc64 dlpar: when
adding separate, successive memory blocks, each memory block will have
unmovable allocations on them - for example gigantic pages will fail to
allocate.
While the ZONE_NORMAL doesn't provide any guarantees that memory can get
offlined+removed again (any kind of fragmentation with unmovable
allocations is possible), there are many scenarios (hotplugging a lot of
memory, running workload, hotunplug some memory/as much as possible) where
we can offline+remove quite a lot with this patchset.
a) To visualize the problem, a very simple example:
Start a VM with 4GB and 8GB of virtio-mem memory:
[root@localhost ~]# lsmem
RANGE SIZE STATE REMOVABLE BLOCK
0x0000000000000000-0x00000000bfffffff 3G online yes 0-23
0x0000000100000000-0x000000033fffffff 9G online yes 32-103
Memory block size: 128M
Total online memory: 12G
Total offline memory: 0B
Then try to unplug as much as possible using virtio-mem. Observe which
memory blocks are still around. Without this patch set:
[root@localhost ~]# lsmem
RANGE SIZE STATE REMOVABLE BLOCK
0x0000000000000000-0x00000000bfffffff 3G online yes 0-23
0x0000000100000000-0x000000013fffffff 1G online yes 32-39
0x0000000148000000-0x000000014fffffff 128M online yes 41
0x0000000158000000-0x000000015fffffff 128M online yes 43
0x0000000168000000-0x000000016fffffff 128M online yes 45
0x0000000178000000-0x000000017fffffff 128M online yes 47
0x0000000188000000-0x0000000197ffffff 256M online yes 49-50
0x00000001a0000000-0x00000001a7ffffff 128M online yes 52
0x00000001b0000000-0x00000001b7ffffff 128M online yes 54
0x00000001c0000000-0x00000001c7ffffff 128M online yes 56
0x00000001d0000000-0x00000001d7ffffff 128M online yes 58
0x00000001e0000000-0x00000001e7ffffff 128M online yes 60
0x00000001f0000000-0x00000001f7ffffff 128M online yes 62
0x0000000200000000-0x0000000207ffffff 128M online yes 64
0x0000000210000000-0x0000000217ffffff 128M online yes 66
0x0000000220000000-0x0000000227ffffff 128M online yes 68
0x0000000230000000-0x0000000237ffffff 128M online yes 70
0x0000000240000000-0x0000000247ffffff 128M online yes 72
0x0000000250000000-0x0000000257ffffff 128M online yes 74
0x0000000260000000-0x0000000267ffffff 128M online yes 76
0x0000000270000000-0x0000000277ffffff 128M online yes 78
0x0000000280000000-0x0000000287ffffff 128M online yes 80
0x0000000290000000-0x0000000297ffffff 128M online yes 82
0x00000002a0000000-0x00000002a7ffffff 128M online yes 84
0x00000002b0000000-0x00000002b7ffffff 128M online yes 86
0x00000002c0000000-0x00000002c7ffffff 128M online yes 88
0x00000002d0000000-0x00000002d7ffffff 128M online yes 90
0x00000002e0000000-0x00000002e7ffffff 128M online yes 92
0x00000002f0000000-0x00000002f7ffffff 128M online yes 94
0x0000000300000000-0x0000000307ffffff 128M online yes 96
0x0000000310000000-0x0000000317ffffff 128M online yes 98
0x0000000320000000-0x0000000327ffffff 128M online yes 100
0x0000000330000000-0x000000033fffffff 256M online yes 102-103
Memory block size: 128M
Total online memory: 8.1G
Total offline memory: 0B
With this patch set:
[root@localhost ~]# lsmem
RANGE SIZE STATE REMOVABLE BLOCK
0x0000000000000000-0x00000000bfffffff 3G online yes 0-23
0x0000000100000000-0x000000013fffffff 1G online yes 32-39
Memory block size: 128M
Total online memory: 4G
Total offline memory: 0B
All memory can get unplugged, all memory block can get removed. Of
course, no workload ran and the system was basically idle, but it
highlights the issue - the fairly deterministic chain of unmovable
allocations. When a huge page for the 2MB memmap is needed, a
just-onlined 4MB page will be split. The remaining 2MB page will be used
for the memmap of the next memory block. So one memory block will hold
the memmap of the two following memory blocks. Finally the pages of the
last-onlined memory block will get used for the next bigger allocations -
if any allocation is unmovable, all dependent memory blocks cannot get
unplugged and removed until that allocation is gone.
Note that with bigger memory blocks (e.g., 256MB), *all* memory
blocks are dependent and none can get unplugged again!
b) Experiment with memory intensive workload
I performed an experiment with an older version of this patch set (before
we used undo_isolate_page_range() in online_pages(): Hotplug 56GB to a VM
with an initial 4GB, onlining all memory to ZONE_NORMAL right from the
kernel when adding it. I then run various memory intensive workloads that
consume most system memory for a total of 45 minutes. Once finished, I
try to unplug as much memory as possible.
With this change, I am able to remove via virtio-mem (adding individual
128MB memory blocks) 413 out of 448 added memory blocks. Via individual
(256MB) DIMMs 380 out of 448 added memory blocks. (I don't have any
numbers without this patchset, but looking at the above example, it's at
most half of the 448 memory blocks for virtio-mem, and most probably none
for DIMMs).
Again, there are workloads that might behave very differently due to the
nature of ZONE_NORMAL.
This change also affects (besides memory onlining):
- Other users of undo_isolate_page_range(): Pages are always placed to the
tail.
-- When memory offlining fails
-- When memory isolation fails after having isolated some pageblocks
-- When alloc_contig_range() either succeeds or fails
- Other users of __putback_isolated_page(): Pages are always placed to the
tail.
-- Free page reporting
- Other users of __free_pages_core()
-- AFAIKs, any memory that is getting exposed to the buddy during boot.
IIUC we will now usually allocate memory from lower addresses within
a zone first (especially during boot).
- Other users of generic_online_page()
-- Hyper-V balloon
This patch (of 5):
Let's prepare for additional flags and avoid long parameter lists of
bools. Follow-up patches will also make use of the flags in
__free_pages_ok().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005121534.15649-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005121534.15649-2-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-convert-report-flag-of-__free_one_page-to-a-proper-flag
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -78,6 +78,22 @@
#include "shuffle.h"
#include "page_reporting.h"
+/* Free Page Internal flags: for internal, non-pcp variants of free_pages(). */
+typedef int __bitwise fpi_t;
+
+/* No special request */
+#define FPI_NONE ((__force fpi_t)0)
+
+/*
+ * Skip free page reporting notification for the (possibly merged) page.
+ * This does not hinder free page reporting from grabbing the page,
+ * reporting it and marking it "reported" - it only skips notifying
+ * the free page reporting infrastructure about a newly freed page. For
+ * example, used when temporarily pulling a page from a freelist and
+ * putting it back unmodified.
+ */
+#define FPI_SKIP_REPORT_NOTIFY ((__force fpi_t)BIT(0))
+
/* prevent >1 _updater_ of zone percpu pageset ->high and ->batch fields */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcp_batch_high_lock);
#define MIN_PERCPU_PAGELIST_FRACTION (8)
@@ -952,7 +968,7 @@ buddy_merge_likely(unsigned long pfn, un
static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
unsigned long pfn,
struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
- int migratetype, bool report)
+ int migratetype, fpi_t fpi_flags)
{
struct capture_control *capc = task_capc(zone);
unsigned long buddy_pfn;
@@ -1039,7 +1055,7 @@ done_merging:
add_to_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype);
/* Notify page reporting subsystem of freed page */
- if (report)
+ if (!(fpi_flags & FPI_SKIP_REPORT_NOTIFY))
page_reporting_notify_free(order);
}
@@ -1380,7 +1396,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zo
if (unlikely(isolated_pageblocks))
mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
- __free_one_page(page, page_to_pfn(page), zone, 0, mt, true);
+ __free_one_page(page, page_to_pfn(page), zone, 0, mt, FPI_NONE);
trace_mm_page_pcpu_drain(page, 0, mt);
}
spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
@@ -1396,7 +1412,7 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *z
is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))) {
migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
}
- __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, migratetype, true);
+ __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, migratetype, FPI_NONE);
spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
}
@@ -3289,7 +3305,8 @@ void __putback_isolated_page(struct page
lockdep_assert_held(&zone->lock);
/* Return isolated page to tail of freelist. */
- __free_one_page(page, page_to_pfn(page), zone, order, mt, false);
+ __free_one_page(page, page_to_pfn(page), zone, order, mt,
+ FPI_SKIP_REPORT_NOTIFY);
}
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-10-16 20:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-16 20:51 [merged] mm-page_alloc-convert-report-flag-of-__free_one_page-to-a-proper-flag.patch removed from -mm tree akpm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).