mm-commits.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* + mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch added to -mm tree
@ 2020-12-23  2:22 akpm
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: akpm @ 2020-12-23  2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mm-commits, vdavydov.dev, shakeelb, samitolvanen, rdunlap,
	rafael, pankaj.gupta, neilb, mhocko, iamjoonsoo.kim, hughd,
	hannes, guro, gregkh, feng.tang, adobriyan, songmuchun


The patch titled
     Subject: mm: memcontrol: make the slab calculation consistent
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: mm: memcontrol: make the slab calculation consistent

Although the ratio of the slab is one, we also should read the ratio from
the related memory_stats instead of hard-coding.  And the local variable
of size is already the value of slab_unreclaimable.  So we do not need to
read again.

To do this we need some code like below:

if (unlikely(memory_stats[i].idx == NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B)) {
-	size = memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) +
-	       memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B);
+	size += memcg_page_state(memcg, memory_stats[i - 1].idx) *
+		memory_stats[i - 1].ratio;

It requires a series of BUG_ONs or comments to ensure these two items are
actually adjacent and in the right order.  So it would probably be easier
to implement this using a wrapper that has a big switch() for unit
conversion.

This would fix the ratio inconsistency and get rid of the order guarantee.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201217034356.4708-8-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>
Cc: Rafael. J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |  105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1512,49 +1512,71 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move(st
 
 struct memory_stat {
 	const char *name;
-	unsigned int ratio;
 	unsigned int idx;
 };
 
 static const struct memory_stat memory_stats[] = {
-	{ "anon", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ANON_MAPPED },
-	{ "file", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_PAGES },
-	{ "kernel_stack", 1024, NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB },
-	{ "pagetables", PAGE_SIZE, NR_PAGETABLE },
-	{ "percpu", 1, MEMCG_PERCPU_B },
-	{ "sock", PAGE_SIZE, MEMCG_SOCK },
-	{ "shmem", PAGE_SIZE, NR_SHMEM },
-	{ "file_mapped", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_MAPPED },
-	{ "file_dirty", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_DIRTY },
-	{ "file_writeback", PAGE_SIZE, NR_WRITEBACK },
+	{ "anon",			NR_ANON_MAPPED			},
+	{ "file",			NR_FILE_PAGES			},
+	{ "kernel_stack",		NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB		},
+	{ "pagetables",			NR_PAGETABLE			},
+	{ "percpu",			MEMCG_PERCPU_B			},
+	{ "sock",			MEMCG_SOCK			},
+	{ "shmem",			NR_SHMEM			},
+	{ "file_mapped",		NR_FILE_MAPPED			},
+	{ "file_dirty",			NR_FILE_DIRTY			},
+	{ "file_writeback",		NR_WRITEBACK			},
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-	{ "anon_thp", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ANON_THPS },
-	{ "file_thp", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_THPS },
-	{ "shmem_thp", PAGE_SIZE, NR_SHMEM_THPS },
+	{ "anon_thp",			NR_ANON_THPS			},
+	{ "file_thp",			NR_FILE_THPS			},
+	{ "shmem_thp",			NR_SHMEM_THPS			},
 #endif
-	{ "inactive_anon", PAGE_SIZE, NR_INACTIVE_ANON },
-	{ "active_anon", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ACTIVE_ANON },
-	{ "inactive_file", PAGE_SIZE, NR_INACTIVE_FILE },
-	{ "active_file", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ACTIVE_FILE },
-	{ "unevictable", PAGE_SIZE, NR_UNEVICTABLE },
-
-	/*
-	 * Note: The slab_reclaimable and slab_unreclaimable must be
-	 * together and slab_reclaimable must be in front.
-	 */
-	{ "slab_reclaimable", 1, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B },
-	{ "slab_unreclaimable", 1, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B },
+	{ "inactive_anon",		NR_INACTIVE_ANON		},
+	{ "active_anon",		NR_ACTIVE_ANON			},
+	{ "inactive_file",		NR_INACTIVE_FILE		},
+	{ "active_file",		NR_ACTIVE_FILE			},
+	{ "unevictable",		NR_UNEVICTABLE			},
+	{ "slab_reclaimable",		NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B		},
+	{ "slab_unreclaimable",		NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B		},
 
 	/* The memory events */
-	{ "workingset_refault_anon", 1, WORKINGSET_REFAULT_ANON },
-	{ "workingset_refault_file", 1, WORKINGSET_REFAULT_FILE },
-	{ "workingset_activate_anon", 1, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON },
-	{ "workingset_activate_file", 1, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE },
-	{ "workingset_restore_anon", 1, WORKINGSET_RESTORE_ANON },
-	{ "workingset_restore_file", 1, WORKINGSET_RESTORE_FILE },
-	{ "workingset_nodereclaim", 1, WORKINGSET_NODERECLAIM },
+	{ "workingset_refault_anon",	WORKINGSET_REFAULT_ANON		},
+	{ "workingset_refault_file",	WORKINGSET_REFAULT_FILE		},
+	{ "workingset_activate_anon",	WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON	},
+	{ "workingset_activate_file",	WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE	},
+	{ "workingset_restore_anon",	WORKINGSET_RESTORE_ANON		},
+	{ "workingset_restore_file",	WORKINGSET_RESTORE_FILE		},
+	{ "workingset_nodereclaim",	WORKINGSET_NODERECLAIM		},
 };
 
+/* Translate stat items to the correct unit for memory.stat output */
+static int memcg_page_state_unit(int item)
+{
+	switch (item) {
+	case MEMCG_PERCPU_B:
+	case NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B:
+	case NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B:
+	case WORKINGSET_REFAULT_ANON:
+	case WORKINGSET_REFAULT_FILE:
+	case WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON:
+	case WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE:
+	case WORKINGSET_RESTORE_ANON:
+	case WORKINGSET_RESTORE_FILE:
+	case WORKINGSET_NODERECLAIM:
+		return 1;
+	case NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB:
+		return SZ_1K;
+	default:
+		return PAGE_SIZE;
+	}
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long memcg_page_state_output(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+						    int item)
+{
+	return memcg_page_state(memcg, item) * memcg_page_state_unit(item);
+}
+
 static char *memory_stat_format(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	struct seq_buf s;
@@ -1578,13 +1600,12 @@ static char *memory_stat_format(struct m
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(memory_stats); i++) {
 		u64 size;
 
-		size = memcg_page_state(memcg, memory_stats[i].idx);
-		size *= memory_stats[i].ratio;
+		size = memcg_page_state_output(memcg, memory_stats[i].idx);
 		seq_buf_printf(&s, "%s %llu\n", memory_stats[i].name, size);
 
 		if (unlikely(memory_stats[i].idx == NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B)) {
-			size = memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) +
-			       memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B);
+			size += memcg_page_state_output(memcg,
+							NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B);
 			seq_buf_printf(&s, "slab %llu\n", size);
 		}
 	}
@@ -6378,6 +6399,12 @@ static int memory_stat_show(struct seq_f
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+static inline unsigned long lruvec_page_state_output(struct lruvec *lruvec,
+						     int item)
+{
+	return lruvec_page_state(lruvec, item) * memcg_page_state_unit(item);
+}
+
 static int memory_numa_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -6395,8 +6422,8 @@ static int memory_numa_stat_show(struct
 			struct lruvec *lruvec;
 
 			lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, NODE_DATA(nid));
-			size = lruvec_page_state(lruvec, memory_stats[i].idx);
-			size *= memory_stats[i].ratio;
+			size = lruvec_page_state_output(lruvec,
+							memory_stats[i].idx);
 			seq_printf(m, " N%d=%llu", nid, size);
 		}
 		seq_putc(m, '\n');
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from songmuchun@bytedance.com are

mm-memcontrol-fix-nr_anon_thps-accounting-in-charge-moving.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_anon_thps-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_file_thps-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_shmem_thps-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_shmem_pmdmapped-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_file_pmdmapped-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* + mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch added to -mm tree
@ 2020-12-29 19:57 akpm
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: akpm @ 2020-12-29 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mm-commits, vdavydov.dev, shakeelb, samitolvanen, rdunlap,
	rafael, pankaj.gupta, neilb, mhocko, iamjoonsoo.kim, hughd,
	hannes, guro, gregkh, feng.tang, adobriyan, songmuchun


The patch titled
     Subject: mm: memcontrol: make the slab calculation consistent
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: mm: memcontrol: make the slab calculation consistent

Although the ratio of the slab is one, we also should read the ratio from
the related memory_stats instead of hard-coding.  And the local variable
of size is already the value of slab_unreclaimable.  So we do not need to
read again.

To do this we need some code like below:

if (unlikely(memory_stats[i].idx == NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B)) {
-	size = memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) +
-	       memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B);
+       VM_BUG_ON(i < 1);
+       VM_BUG_ON(memory_stats[i - 1].idx != NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B);
+	size += memcg_page_state(memcg, memory_stats[i - 1].idx) *
+		memory_stats[i - 1].ratio;

It requires a series of VM_BUG_ONs or comments to ensure these two items
are actually adjacent and in the right order.  So it would probably be
easier to implement this using a wrapper that has a big switch() for unit
conversion.

More details about this discussion can refer to:

    https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1348611/

This would fix the ratio inconsistency and get rid of the order
guarantee.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201228164110.2838-8-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@cloud.ionos.com>
Cc: Rafael. J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |  105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1512,49 +1512,71 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move(st
 
 struct memory_stat {
 	const char *name;
-	unsigned int ratio;
 	unsigned int idx;
 };
 
 static const struct memory_stat memory_stats[] = {
-	{ "anon", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ANON_MAPPED },
-	{ "file", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_PAGES },
-	{ "kernel_stack", 1024, NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB },
-	{ "pagetables", PAGE_SIZE, NR_PAGETABLE },
-	{ "percpu", 1, MEMCG_PERCPU_B },
-	{ "sock", PAGE_SIZE, MEMCG_SOCK },
-	{ "shmem", PAGE_SIZE, NR_SHMEM },
-	{ "file_mapped", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_MAPPED },
-	{ "file_dirty", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_DIRTY },
-	{ "file_writeback", PAGE_SIZE, NR_WRITEBACK },
+	{ "anon",			NR_ANON_MAPPED			},
+	{ "file",			NR_FILE_PAGES			},
+	{ "kernel_stack",		NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB		},
+	{ "pagetables",			NR_PAGETABLE			},
+	{ "percpu",			MEMCG_PERCPU_B			},
+	{ "sock",			MEMCG_SOCK			},
+	{ "shmem",			NR_SHMEM			},
+	{ "file_mapped",		NR_FILE_MAPPED			},
+	{ "file_dirty",			NR_FILE_DIRTY			},
+	{ "file_writeback",		NR_WRITEBACK			},
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-	{ "anon_thp", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ANON_THPS },
-	{ "file_thp", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_THPS },
-	{ "shmem_thp", PAGE_SIZE, NR_SHMEM_THPS },
+	{ "anon_thp",			NR_ANON_THPS			},
+	{ "file_thp",			NR_FILE_THPS			},
+	{ "shmem_thp",			NR_SHMEM_THPS			},
 #endif
-	{ "inactive_anon", PAGE_SIZE, NR_INACTIVE_ANON },
-	{ "active_anon", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ACTIVE_ANON },
-	{ "inactive_file", PAGE_SIZE, NR_INACTIVE_FILE },
-	{ "active_file", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ACTIVE_FILE },
-	{ "unevictable", PAGE_SIZE, NR_UNEVICTABLE },
-
-	/*
-	 * Note: The slab_reclaimable and slab_unreclaimable must be
-	 * together and slab_reclaimable must be in front.
-	 */
-	{ "slab_reclaimable", 1, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B },
-	{ "slab_unreclaimable", 1, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B },
+	{ "inactive_anon",		NR_INACTIVE_ANON		},
+	{ "active_anon",		NR_ACTIVE_ANON			},
+	{ "inactive_file",		NR_INACTIVE_FILE		},
+	{ "active_file",		NR_ACTIVE_FILE			},
+	{ "unevictable",		NR_UNEVICTABLE			},
+	{ "slab_reclaimable",		NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B		},
+	{ "slab_unreclaimable",		NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B		},
 
 	/* The memory events */
-	{ "workingset_refault_anon", 1, WORKINGSET_REFAULT_ANON },
-	{ "workingset_refault_file", 1, WORKINGSET_REFAULT_FILE },
-	{ "workingset_activate_anon", 1, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON },
-	{ "workingset_activate_file", 1, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE },
-	{ "workingset_restore_anon", 1, WORKINGSET_RESTORE_ANON },
-	{ "workingset_restore_file", 1, WORKINGSET_RESTORE_FILE },
-	{ "workingset_nodereclaim", 1, WORKINGSET_NODERECLAIM },
+	{ "workingset_refault_anon",	WORKINGSET_REFAULT_ANON		},
+	{ "workingset_refault_file",	WORKINGSET_REFAULT_FILE		},
+	{ "workingset_activate_anon",	WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON	},
+	{ "workingset_activate_file",	WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE	},
+	{ "workingset_restore_anon",	WORKINGSET_RESTORE_ANON		},
+	{ "workingset_restore_file",	WORKINGSET_RESTORE_FILE		},
+	{ "workingset_nodereclaim",	WORKINGSET_NODERECLAIM		},
 };
 
+/* Translate stat items to the correct unit for memory.stat output */
+static int memcg_page_state_unit(int item)
+{
+	switch (item) {
+	case MEMCG_PERCPU_B:
+	case NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B:
+	case NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B:
+	case WORKINGSET_REFAULT_ANON:
+	case WORKINGSET_REFAULT_FILE:
+	case WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON:
+	case WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE:
+	case WORKINGSET_RESTORE_ANON:
+	case WORKINGSET_RESTORE_FILE:
+	case WORKINGSET_NODERECLAIM:
+		return 1;
+	case NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB:
+		return SZ_1K;
+	default:
+		return PAGE_SIZE;
+	}
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long memcg_page_state_output(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+						    int item)
+{
+	return memcg_page_state(memcg, item) * memcg_page_state_unit(item);
+}
+
 static char *memory_stat_format(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	struct seq_buf s;
@@ -1578,13 +1600,12 @@ static char *memory_stat_format(struct m
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(memory_stats); i++) {
 		u64 size;
 
-		size = memcg_page_state(memcg, memory_stats[i].idx);
-		size *= memory_stats[i].ratio;
+		size = memcg_page_state_output(memcg, memory_stats[i].idx);
 		seq_buf_printf(&s, "%s %llu\n", memory_stats[i].name, size);
 
 		if (unlikely(memory_stats[i].idx == NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B)) {
-			size = memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) +
-			       memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B);
+			size += memcg_page_state_output(memcg,
+							NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B);
 			seq_buf_printf(&s, "slab %llu\n", size);
 		}
 	}
@@ -6378,6 +6399,12 @@ static int memory_stat_show(struct seq_f
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+static inline unsigned long lruvec_page_state_output(struct lruvec *lruvec,
+						     int item)
+{
+	return lruvec_page_state(lruvec, item) * memcg_page_state_unit(item);
+}
+
 static int memory_numa_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -6395,8 +6422,8 @@ static int memory_numa_stat_show(struct
 			struct lruvec *lruvec;
 
 			lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, NODE_DATA(nid));
-			size = lruvec_page_state(lruvec, memory_stats[i].idx);
-			size *= memory_stats[i].ratio;
+			size = lruvec_page_state_output(lruvec,
+							memory_stats[i].idx);
 			seq_printf(m, " N%d=%llu", nid, size);
 		}
 		seq_putc(m, '\n');
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from songmuchun@bytedance.com are

mm-memcontrol-optimize-per-lruvec-stats-counter-memory-usage.patch
mm-memcontrol-fix-nr_anon_thps-accounting-in-charge-moving.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_anon_thps-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_file_thps-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_shmem_thps-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_shmem_pmdmapped-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-convert-nr_file_pmdmapped-account-to-pages.patch
mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* + mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch added to -mm tree
@ 2020-12-03 23:54 akpm
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: akpm @ 2020-12-03 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guro, hannes, mhocko, mm-commits, songmuchun, vdavydov.dev


The patch titled
     Subject: mm/memcontrol: make the slab calculation consistent
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: mm/memcontrol: make the slab calculation consistent

Although the ratio of the slab is one, we also should read the ratio from
the related memory_stats instead of hard-coding.  And the local variable
of size is already the value of slab_unreclaimable.  So we do not need to
read again.  Simplify the code here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203031111.3187-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1612,12 +1612,22 @@ static int __init memory_stats_init(void
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(memory_stats); i++) {
+		switch (memory_stats[i].idx) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-		if (memory_stats[i].idx == NR_ANON_THPS ||
-		    memory_stats[i].idx == NR_FILE_THPS ||
-		    memory_stats[i].idx == NR_SHMEM_THPS)
+		case NR_ANON_THPS:
+		case NR_FILE_THPS:
+		case NR_SHMEM_THPS:
 			memory_stats[i].ratio = HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
+			break;
 #endif
+		case NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B:
+			VM_BUG_ON(i < 1);
+			VM_BUG_ON(memory_stats[i - 1].idx != NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B);
+			break;
+		default:
+			break;
+		}
+
 		VM_BUG_ON(!memory_stats[i].ratio);
 		VM_BUG_ON(memory_stats[i].idx >= MEMCG_NR_STAT);
 	}
@@ -1653,9 +1663,15 @@ static char *memory_stat_format(struct m
 		size *= memory_stats[i].ratio;
 		seq_buf_printf(&s, "%s %llu\n", memory_stats[i].name, size);
 
+		/*
+		 * We are printing reclaimable, unreclaimable of the slab
+		 * and the sum of both.
+		 */
 		if (unlikely(memory_stats[i].idx == NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B)) {
-			size = memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) +
-			       memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B);
+			int idx = i - 1;
+
+			size += memcg_page_state(memcg, memory_stats[idx].idx) *
+				memory_stats[idx].ratio;
 			seq_buf_printf(&s, "slab %llu\n", size);
 		}
 	}
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from songmuchun@bytedance.com are

mm-memcontrol-remove-unused-mod_memcg_obj_state.patch
mm-memcg-slab-fix-return-child-memcg-objcg-for-root-memcg.patch
mm-memcg-slab-fix-use-after-free-in-obj_cgroup_charge.patch
mm-memcg-slab-rename-_lruvec_slab_state-to-_lruvec_kmem_state.patch
mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch
mm-page_isolation-do-not-isolate-the-max-order-page.patch


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-29 19:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-23  2:22 + mm-memcontrol-make-the-slab-calculation-consistent.patch added to -mm tree akpm
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-29 19:57 akpm
2020-12-03 23:54 akpm

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).