+ mm-vmscan-add-per-memcg-shrinker-nr_deferred.patch added to -mm tree

+ mm-vmscan-add-per-memcg-shrinker-nr_deferred.patch added to -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm: vmscan: add per memcg shrinker nr_deferred
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-vmscan-add-per-memcg-shrinker-nr_deferred.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-vmscan-add-per-memcg-shrinker-nr_deferred.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-vmscan-add-per-memcg-shrinker-nr_deferred.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: mm: vmscan: add per memcg shrinker nr_deferred

Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs,
for example, vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in
poor isolation among memcgs.

The deferred objects typically are generated by __GFP_NOFS allocations,
one memcg with excessive __GFP_NOFS allocations may blow up deferred
objects, then other innocent memcgs may suffer from over shrink, excessive
reclaim latency, etc.

For example, two workloads run in memcgA and memcgB respectively, workload
in B is vfs heavy workload.  Workload in A generates excessive deferred
objects, then B's vfs cache might be hit heavily (drop half of caches) by
B's limit reclaim or global reclaim.

We observed this hit in our production environment which was running vfs
heavy workload shown as the below tracing log:

<...>-409454 [016] .... 28286961.747146: mm_shrink_slab_start: super_cache_scan+0x0/0x1a0 ffff9a83046f3458:
nid: 1 objects to shrink 3641681686040 gfp_flags GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO pgs_scanned 1 lru_pgs 15721
cache items 246404277 delta 31345 total_scan 123202138
<...>-409454 [022] .... 28287105.928018: mm_shrink_slab_end: super_cache_scan+0x0/0x1a0 ffff9a83046f3458:
nid: 1 unused scan count 3641681686040 new scan count 3641798379189 total_scan 602
last shrinker return val 123186855

The vfs cache and page cache ratio was 10:1 on this machine, and half of
caches were dropped.  This also resulted in significant amount of page
caches were dropped due to inodes eviction.

Make nr_deferred per memcg for memcg aware shrinkers would solve the
unfairness and bring better isolation.

The following patch will add nr_deferred to parent memcg when memcg
offline.  To preserve nr_deferred when reparenting memcgs to root, root
memcg needs shrinker_info allocated too.

When memcg is not enabled (!CONFIG_MEMCG or memcg disabled), the
shrinker's nr_deferred would be used.  And non memcg aware shrinkers use
shrinker's nr_deferred all the time.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210311190845.9708-10-shy828301@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |    7 ++--
 mm/vmscan.c                |   60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~mm-vmscan-add-per-memcg-shrinker-nr_deferred
+++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -114,12 +114,13 @@ struct batched_lruvec_stat {
 };
 
 /*
- * Bitmap of shrinker::id corresponding to memcg-aware shrinkers,
- * which have elements charged to this memcg.
+ * Bitmap and deferred work of shrinker::id corresponding to memcg-aware
+ * shrinkers, which have elements charged to this memcg.
  */
 struct shrinker_info {
 	struct rcu_head rcu;
-	unsigned long map[];
+	atomic_long_t *nr_deferred;
+	unsigned long *map;
 };
 
 /*
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-add-per-memcg-shrinker-nr_deferred
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -187,11 +187,17 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 static int shrinker_nr_max;
 
+/* The shrinker_info is expanded in a batch of BITS_PER_LONG */
 static inline int shrinker_map_size(int nr_items)
 {
 	return (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_items, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long));
 }
 
+static inline int shrinker_defer_size(int nr_items)
+{
+	return (round_up(nr_items, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(atomic_long_t));
+}
+
 static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 						     int nid)
 {
@@ -200,11 +206,13 @@ static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_in
 }
 
 static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
-				    int size, int old_size)
+				    int map_size, int defer_size,
+				    int old_map_size, int old_defer_size)
 {
 	struct shrinker_info *new, *old;
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
 	int nid;
+	int size = map_size + defer_size;
 
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
@@ -217,9 +225,16 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(stru
 		if (!new)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		/* Set all old bits, clear all new bits */
-		memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_size);
-		memset((void *)new->map + old_size, 0, size - old_size);
+		new->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(new + 1);
+		new->map = (void *)new->nr_deferred + defer_size;
+
+		/* map: set all old bits, clear all new bits */
+		memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_map_size);
+		memset((void *)new->map + old_map_size, 0, map_size - old_map_size);
+		/* nr_deferred: copy old values, clear all new values */
+		memcpy(new->nr_deferred, old->nr_deferred, old_defer_size);
+		memset((void *)new->nr_deferred + old_defer_size, 0,
+		       defer_size - old_defer_size);
 
 		rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, new);
 		kvfree_rcu(old, rcu);
@@ -234,9 +249,6 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgrou
 	struct shrinker_info *info;
 	int nid;
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
-		return;
-
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
 		info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
@@ -249,12 +261,12 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgrou
 {
 	struct shrinker_info *info;
 	int nid, size, ret = 0;
-
-	if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
-		return 0;
+	int map_size, defer_size = 0;
 
 	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-	size = shrinker_map_size(shrinker_nr_max);
+	map_size = shrinker_map_size(shrinker_nr_max);
+	defer_size = shrinker_defer_size(shrinker_nr_max);
+	size = map_size + defer_size;
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		info = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*info) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
 		if (!info) {
@@ -262,6 +274,8 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgrou
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			break;
 		}
+		info->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(info + 1);
+		info->map = (void *)info->nr_deferred + defer_size;
 		rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, info);
 	}
 	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
@@ -269,15 +283,21 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgrou
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static inline bool need_expand(int nr_max)
+{
+	return round_up(nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) >
+	       round_up(shrinker_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG);
+}
+
 static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
 {
-	int size, old_size, ret = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
 	int new_nr_max = new_id + 1;
+	int map_size, defer_size = 0;
+	int old_map_size, old_defer_size = 0;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 
-	size = shrinker_map_size(new_nr_max);
-	old_size = shrinker_map_size(shrinker_nr_max);
-	if (size <= old_size)
+	if (!need_expand(new_nr_max))
 		goto out;
 
 	if (!root_mem_cgroup)
@@ -285,11 +305,15 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
 
+	map_size = shrinker_map_size(new_nr_max);
+	defer_size = shrinker_defer_size(new_nr_max);
+	old_map_size = shrinker_map_size(shrinker_nr_max);
+	old_defer_size = shrinker_defer_size(shrinker_nr_max);
+
 	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
 	do {
-		if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
-			continue;
-		ret = expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, size, old_size);
+		ret = expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, map_size, defer_size,
+					       old_map_size, old_defer_size);
 		if (ret) {
 			mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
 			goto out;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from shy828301@gmail.com are

mm-vmscan-use-nid-from-shrink_control-for-tracepoint.patch
mm-vmscan-consolidate-shrinker_maps-handling-code.patch
mm-vmscan-use-shrinker_rwsem-to-protect-shrinker_maps-allocation.patch
mm-vmscan-remove-memcg_shrinker_map_size.patch
mm-vmscan-use-kvfree_rcu-instead-of-call_rcu.patch
mm-memcontrol-rename-shrinker_map-to-shrinker_info.patch
mm-vmscan-add-shrinker_info_protected-helper.patch
mm-vmscan-use-a-new-flag-to-indicate-shrinker-is-registered.patch
mm-vmscan-add-per-memcg-shrinker-nr_deferred.patch
mm-vmscan-use-per-memcg-nr_deferred-of-shrinker.patch
mm-vmscan-dont-need-allocate-shrinker-nr_deferred-for-memcg-aware-shrinkers.patch
mm-memcontrol-reparent-nr_deferred-when-memcg-offline.patch
mm-vmscan-shrink-deferred-objects-proportional-to-priority.patch