* [merged] mm-gup-add-a-range-variant-of-unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2021-05-08 22:40 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: akpm @ 2021-05-08 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dledford, hch, jgg, jhubbard, joao.m.martins, mm-commits, willy
The patch titled
Subject: mm/gup: add a range variant of unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-gup-add-a-range-variant-of-unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Subject: mm/gup: add a range variant of unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock()
Add an unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock() API which takes a starting page
and how many consecutive pages we want to unpin and optionally dirty.
To that end, define another iterator for_each_compound_range() that
operates in page ranges as opposed to page array.
For users (like RDMA mr_dereg) where each sg represents a contiguous set
of pages, we're able to more efficiently unpin pages without having to
supply an array of pages much of what happens today with
unpin_user_pages().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210212130843.13865-4-joao.m.martins@oracle.com
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 2 +
mm/gup.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
--- a/include/linux/mm.h~mm-gup-add-a-range-variant-of-unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock
+++ a/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1265,6 +1265,8 @@ static inline void put_page(struct page
void unpin_user_page(struct page *page);
void unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
bool make_dirty);
+void unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock(struct page *page, unsigned long npages,
+ bool make_dirty);
void unpin_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
/**
--- a/mm/gup.c~mm-gup-add-a-range-variant-of-unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock
+++ a/mm/gup.c
@@ -213,6 +213,32 @@ void unpin_user_page(struct page *page)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unpin_user_page);
+static inline void compound_range_next(unsigned long i, unsigned long npages,
+ struct page **list, struct page **head,
+ unsigned int *ntails)
+{
+ struct page *next, *page;
+ unsigned int nr = 1;
+
+ if (i >= npages)
+ return;
+
+ next = *list + i;
+ page = compound_head(next);
+ if (PageCompound(page) && compound_order(page) >= 1)
+ nr = min_t(unsigned int,
+ page + compound_nr(page) - next, npages - i);
+
+ *head = page;
+ *ntails = nr;
+}
+
+#define for_each_compound_range(__i, __list, __npages, __head, __ntails) \
+ for (__i = 0, \
+ compound_range_next(__i, __npages, __list, &(__head), &(__ntails)); \
+ __i < __npages; __i += __ntails, \
+ compound_range_next(__i, __npages, __list, &(__head), &(__ntails)))
+
static inline void compound_next(unsigned long i, unsigned long npages,
struct page **list, struct page **head,
unsigned int *ntails)
@@ -302,6 +328,42 @@ void unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock);
/**
+ * unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty
+ * gup-pinned page range
+ *
+ * @page: the starting page of a range maybe marked dirty, and definitely released.
+ * @npages: number of consecutive pages to release.
+ * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty
+ *
+ * "gup-pinned page range" refers to a range of pages that has had one of the
+ * pin_user_pages() variants called on that page.
+ *
+ * For the page ranges defined by [page .. page+npages], make that range (or
+ * its head pages, if a compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the
+ * page range was previously listed as clean.
+ *
+ * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is
+ * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct,
+ * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it:
+ * set_page_dirty_lock(), unpin_user_page().
+ *
+ */
+void unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock(struct page *page, unsigned long npages,
+ bool make_dirty)
+{
+ unsigned long index;
+ struct page *head;
+ unsigned int ntails;
+
+ for_each_compound_range(index, &page, npages, head, ntails) {
+ if (make_dirty && !PageDirty(head))
+ set_page_dirty_lock(head);
+ put_compound_head(head, ntails, FOLL_PIN);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock);
+
+/**
* unpin_user_pages() - release an array of gup-pinned pages.
* @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
* @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from joao.m.martins@oracle.com are
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-05-08 22:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-08 22:40 [merged] mm-gup-add-a-range-variant-of-unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock.patch removed from -mm tree akpm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).