[merged] add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged] add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma.patch removed from -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm/pagemap: add mmap_assert_locked() annotations to find_vma*()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@google.com>
Subject: mm/pagemap: add mmap_assert_locked() annotations to find_vma*()

find_vma() and variants need protection when used.  This patch adds
mmap_assert_lock() calls in the functions.

To make sure the invariant is satisfied, we also need to add a
mmap_read_loc() around the get_user_pages_remote() call in get_arg_page().
The lock is not strictly necessary because the mm has been newly created,
but the extra cost is limited because the same mutex was also acquired
shortly before in __bprm_mm_init(), so it is hot and uncontended.

[penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp: TOMOYO needs the same protection which get_arg_page() needs]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/58bb6bf7-a57e-8a40-e74b-39584b415152@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210731175341.3458608-1-lrizzo@google.com
Signed-off-by: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@google.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/exec.c                |    2 ++
 mm/mmap.c                |    2 ++
 security/tomoyo/domain.c |   13 +++++++++----
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/exec.c~add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma
+++ a/fs/exec.c
@@ -217,8 +217,10 @@ static struct page *get_arg_page(struct
 	 * We are doing an exec().  'current' is the process
 	 * doing the exec and bprm->mm is the new process's mm.
 	 */
+	mmap_read_lock(bprm->mm);
 	ret = get_user_pages_remote(bprm->mm, pos, 1, gup_flags,
 			&page, NULL, NULL);
+	mmap_read_unlock(bprm->mm);
 	if (ret <= 0)
 		return NULL;
 
--- a/mm/mmap.c~add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma
+++ a/mm/mmap.c
@@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ static int find_vma_links(struct mm_stru
 {
 	struct rb_node **__rb_link, *__rb_parent, *rb_prev;
 
+	mmap_assert_locked(mm);
 	__rb_link = &mm->mm_rb.rb_node;
 	rb_prev = __rb_parent = NULL;
 
@@ -2303,6 +2304,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *find_vma(struct m
 	struct rb_node *rb_node;
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 
+	mmap_assert_locked(mm);
 	/* Check the cache first. */
 	vma = vmacache_find(mm, addr);
 	if (likely(vma))
--- a/security/tomoyo/domain.c~add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma
+++ a/security/tomoyo/domain.c
@@ -897,6 +897,9 @@ bool tomoyo_dump_page(struct linux_binpr
 		      struct tomoyo_page_dump *dump)
 {
 	struct page *page;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
+	int ret;
+#endif
 
 	/* dump->data is released by tomoyo_find_next_domain(). */
 	if (!dump->data) {
@@ -909,11 +912,13 @@ bool tomoyo_dump_page(struct linux_binpr
 	/*
 	 * This is called at execve() time in order to dig around
 	 * in the argv/environment of the new proceess
-	 * (represented by bprm).  'current' is the process doing
-	 * the execve().
+	 * (represented by bprm).
 	 */
-	if (get_user_pages_remote(bprm->mm, pos, 1,
-				FOLL_FORCE, &page, NULL, NULL) <= 0)
+	mmap_read_lock(bprm->mm);
+	ret = get_user_pages_remote(bprm->mm, pos, 1,
+				    FOLL_FORCE, &page, NULL, NULL);
+	mmap_read_unlock(bprm->mm);
+	if (ret <= 0)
 		return false;
 #else
 	page = bprm->page[pos / PAGE_SIZE];
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from lrizzo@google.com are