[merged] kasan-test-avoid-corrupting-memory-via-memset.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged] kasan-test-avoid-corrupting-memory-via-memset.patch removed from -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: kasan: test: avoid corrupting memory via memset
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     kasan-test-avoid-corrupting-memory-via-memset.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Subject: kasan: test: avoid corrupting memory via memset

kmalloc_oob_memset_*() tests do writes past the allocated objects.  As the
result, they corrupt memory, which might lead to crashes with the HW_TAGS
mode, as it neither uses quarantine nor redzones.

Adjust the tests to only write memory within the aligned kmalloc objects.

Also add a comment mentioning that memset tests are designed to touch both
valid and invalid memory.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/64fd457668a16e7b58d094f14a165f9d5170c5a9.1628779805.git.andreyknvl@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 lib/test_kasan.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/test_kasan.c~kasan-test-avoid-corrupting-memory-via-memset
+++ a/lib/test_kasan.c
@@ -428,64 +428,70 @@ static void kmalloc_uaf_16(struct kunit
 	kfree(ptr1);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Note: in the memset tests below, the written range touches both valid and
+ * invalid memory. This makes sure that the instrumentation does not only check
+ * the starting address but the whole range.
+ */
+
 static void kmalloc_oob_memset_2(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	char *ptr;
-	size_t size = 8;
+	size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE;
 
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + 7 + OOB_TAG_OFF, 0, 2));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 1, 0, 2));
 	kfree(ptr);
 }
 
 static void kmalloc_oob_memset_4(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	char *ptr;
-	size_t size = 8;
+	size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE;
 
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + 5 + OOB_TAG_OFF, 0, 4));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 3, 0, 4));
 	kfree(ptr);
 }
 
-
 static void kmalloc_oob_memset_8(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	char *ptr;
-	size_t size = 8;
+	size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE;
 
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF, 0, 8));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 7, 0, 8));
 	kfree(ptr);
 }
 
 static void kmalloc_oob_memset_16(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	char *ptr;
-	size_t size = 16;
+	size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE;
 
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + 1 + OOB_TAG_OFF, 0, 16));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 15, 0, 16));
 	kfree(ptr);
 }
 
 static void kmalloc_oob_in_memset(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	char *ptr;
-	size_t size = 666;
+	size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE;
 
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr, 0, size + 5 + OOB_TAG_OFF));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
+				memset(ptr, 0, size + KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE));
 	kfree(ptr);
 }
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from andreyknvl@gmail.com are