* + hugetlb-fix-wrong-use-of-nr_online_nodes.patch added to -mm tree
@ 2022-04-13 4:46 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2022-04-13 4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, yaozhenguo1, songmuchun, mike.kravetz, liuyuntao10,
david, baolin.wang, liupeng256, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: hugetlb: fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
hugetlb-fix-wrong-use-of-nr_online_nodes.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/hugetlb-fix-wrong-use-of-nr_online_nodes.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/hugetlb-fix-wrong-use-of-nr_online_nodes.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Subject: hugetlb: fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes
Patch series "hugetlb: Fix some incorrect behavior", v3.
This series fix three bugs of hugetlb:
1) Invalid use of nr_online_nodes;
2) Inconsistency between 1G hugepage and 2M hugepage;
3) Useless information in dmesg.
This patch (of 4):
Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. In this
case, nr_online_nodes can not be used to walk through numa node. Also, a
valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes.
However, in hugetlb, it is assumed that nodes are contiguous. Recheck all
the places that use nr_online_nodes, and repair them one by one.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413032915.251254-1-liupeng256@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413032915.251254-2-liupeng256@huawei.com
Fixes: 4178158ef8ca ("hugetlbfs: fix issue of preallocation of gigantic pages can't work")
Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
Fixes: e79ce9832316 ("hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter")
Fixes: f9317f77a6e0 ("hugetlb: clean up potential spectre issue warnings")
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~hugetlb-fix-wrong-use-of-nr_online_nodes
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2986,7 +2986,7 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hst
struct huge_bootmem_page *m = NULL; /* initialize for clang */
int nr_nodes, node;
- if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && nid >= nr_online_nodes)
+ if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_online(nid))
return 0;
/* do node specific alloc */
if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
@@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_
}
/* do node specific alloc */
- for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++) {
+ for_each_online_node(i) {
if (h->max_huge_pages_node[i] > 0) {
hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_onenode(h, i);
node_specific_alloc = true;
@@ -4059,7 +4059,7 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
default_hstate.max_huge_pages =
default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
+ for_each_online_node(i)
default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
default_hugepages_in_node[i];
}
@@ -4174,9 +4174,9 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *
pr_warn("HugeTLB: architecture can't support node specific alloc, ignoring!\n");
return 0;
}
- if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes)
+ if (!node_online(tmp))
goto invalid;
- node = array_index_nospec(tmp, nr_online_nodes);
+ node = array_index_nospec(tmp, MAX_NUMNODES);
p += count + 1;
/* Parse hugepages */
if (sscanf(p, "%lu%n", &tmp, &count) != 1)
@@ -4304,7 +4304,7 @@ static int __init default_hugepagesz_set
*/
if (default_hstate_max_huge_pages) {
default_hstate.max_huge_pages = default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
+ for_each_online_node(i)
default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
default_hugepages_in_node[i];
if (hstate_is_gigantic(&default_hstate))
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from liupeng256@huawei.com are
hugetlb-fix-wrong-use-of-nr_online_nodes.patch
hugetlb-fix-hugepages_setup-when-deal-with-pernode.patch
hugetlb-fix-return-value-of-__setup-handlers.patch
hugetlb-clean-up-hugetlb_cma_reserve.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-04-13 4:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-13 4:46 + hugetlb-fix-wrong-use-of-nr_online_nodes.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).