mm-commits.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [merged mm-stable] x86-mm-care-about-shadow-stack-guard-gap-during-placement.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2024-04-26  4:01 Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2024-04-26  4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mm-commits, tglx, peterz, npiggin, naveen.n.rao, mpe, mingo,
	luto, Liam.Howlett, kirill.shutemov, keescook, James.Bottomley,
	hpa, guoren, deller, debug, dave.hansen, dan.j.williams,
	christophe.leroy, broonie, bp, ast, aneesh.kumar,
	rick.p.edgecombe, akpm


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: x86/mm: care about shadow stack guard gap during placement
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     x86-mm-care-about-shadow-stack-guard-gap-during-placement.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Subject: x86/mm: care about shadow stack guard gap during placement
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:16:55 -0700

When memory is being placed, mmap() will take care to respect the guard
gaps of certain types of memory (VM_SHADOWSTACK, VM_GROWSUP and
VM_GROWSDOWN).  In order to ensure guard gaps between mappings, mmap()
needs to consider two things:

 1. That the new mapping isn't placed in an any existing mappings guard
    gaps.
 2. That the new mapping isn't placed such that any existing mappings
    are not in *its* guard gaps.

The longstanding behavior of mmap() is to ensure 1, but not take any care
around 2.  So for example, if there is a PAGE_SIZE free area, and a mmap()
with a PAGE_SIZE size, and a type that has a guard gap is being placed,
mmap() may place the shadow stack in the PAGE_SIZE free area.  Then the
mapping that is supposed to have a guard gap will not have a gap to the
adjacent VMA.

Now that the vm_flags is passed into the arch get_unmapped_area()'s, and
vm_unmapped_area() is ready to consider it, have VM_SHADOW_STACK's get
guard gap consideration for scenario 2.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240326021656.202649-14-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c~x86-mm-care-about-shadow-stack-guard-gap-during-placement
+++ a/arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c
@@ -112,6 +112,14 @@ static void find_start_end(unsigned long
 		*end = task_size_64bit(addr > DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW);
 }
 
+static inline unsigned long stack_guard_placement(vm_flags_t vm_flags)
+{
+	if (vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)
+		return PAGE_SIZE;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 unsigned long
 arch_get_unmapped_area_vmflags(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
 		       unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags, vm_flags_t vm_flags)
@@ -141,6 +149,7 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_vmflags(struct fi
 	info.low_limit = begin;
 	info.high_limit = end;
 	info.align_offset = pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
+	info.start_gap = stack_guard_placement(vm_flags);
 	if (filp) {
 		info.align_mask = get_align_mask();
 		info.align_offset += get_align_bits();
@@ -190,6 +199,7 @@ get_unmapped_area:
 		info.low_limit = PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	info.high_limit = get_mmap_base(0);
+	info.start_gap = stack_guard_placement(vm_flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * If hint address is above DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW, look for unmapped area
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com are



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-04-26  4:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-26  4:01 [merged mm-stable] x86-mm-care-about-shadow-stack-guard-gap-during-placement.patch removed from -mm tree Andrew Morton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).