[merged mm-nonmm-stable] ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged mm-nonmm-stable] ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: ocfs2: correctly use ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-nonmm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: ocfs2: correctly use ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit()
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:17:13 +0800

If no bits are zero, ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit() will return max size, so
check the return value with -1 is meaningless.  Correct this usage and
cleanup the code.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240314021713.240796-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c   |   19 ++++++-------------
 fs/ocfs2/reservations.c |    2 +-
 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c     |    6 ++----
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c~ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c
@@ -863,14 +863,8 @@ static int ocfs2_local_alloc_find_clear_
 
 	numfound = bitoff = startoff = 0;
 	left = le32_to_cpu(alloc->id1.bitmap1.i_total);
-	while ((bitoff = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, left, startoff)) != -1) {
-		if (bitoff == left) {
-			/* mlog(0, "bitoff (%d) == left", bitoff); */
-			break;
-		}
-		/* mlog(0, "Found a zero: bitoff = %d, startoff = %d, "
-		   "numfound = %d\n", bitoff, startoff, numfound);*/
-
+	while ((bitoff = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, left, startoff)) <
+	       left) {
 		/* Ok, we found a zero bit... is it contig. or do we
 		 * start over?*/
 		if (bitoff == startoff) {
@@ -976,9 +970,9 @@ static int ocfs2_sync_local_to_main(stru
 	start = count = 0;
 	left = le32_to_cpu(alloc->id1.bitmap1.i_total);
 
-	while ((bit_off = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, left, start))
-	       != -1) {
-		if ((bit_off < left) && (bit_off == start)) {
+	while ((bit_off = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, left, start)) <
+	       left) {
+		if (bit_off == start) {
 			count++;
 			start++;
 			continue;
@@ -1002,8 +996,7 @@ static int ocfs2_sync_local_to_main(stru
 				goto bail;
 			}
 		}
-		if (bit_off >= left)
-			break;
+
 		count = 1;
 		start = bit_off + 1;
 	}
--- a/fs/ocfs2/reservations.c~ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/reservations.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int ocfs2_resmap_find_free_bits(s
 
 	start = search_start;
 	while ((offset = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, resmap->m_bitmap_len,
-						 start)) != -1) {
+					start)) < resmap->m_bitmap_len) {
 		/* Search reached end of the region */
 		if (offset >= (search_start + search_len))
 			break;
--- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c~ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
@@ -1290,10 +1290,8 @@ static int ocfs2_block_group_find_clear_
 	found = start = best_offset = best_size = 0;
 	bitmap = bg->bg_bitmap;
 
-	while((offset = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, total_bits, start)) != -1) {
-		if (offset == total_bits)
-			break;
-
+	while ((offset = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, total_bits, start)) <
+	       total_bits) {
 		if (!ocfs2_test_bg_bit_allocatable(bg_bh, offset)) {
 			/* We found a zero, but we can't use it as it
 			 * hasn't been put to disk yet! */
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com are