* + ipc-utilc-ipc_rcu_alloc-cacheline-align-allocation.patch added to -mm tree
@ 2013-06-11 22:15 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: akpm @ 2013-06-11 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, riel, davidlohr.bueso, manfred
Subject: + ipc-utilc-ipc_rcu_alloc-cacheline-align-allocation.patch added to -mm tree
To: manfred@colorfullife.com,davidlohr.bueso@hp.com,riel@redhat.com
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:15:37 -0700
The patch titled
Subject: ipc/util.c, ipc_rcu_alloc: cacheline align allocation
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
ipc-utilc-ipc_rcu_alloc-cacheline-align-allocation.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: ipc/util.c, ipc_rcu_alloc: cacheline align allocation
Enforce that ipc_rcu_alloc returns a cacheline aligned pointer on SMP.
Rationale:
The SysV sem code tries to move the main spinlock into a seperate cacheline
(____cacheline_aligned_in_smp). This works only if ipc_rcu_alloc returns
cacheline aligned pointers.
vmalloc and kmalloc return cacheline algined pointers, the implementation
of ipc_rcu_alloc breaks that.
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
ipc/util.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -puN ipc/util.c~ipc-utilc-ipc_rcu_alloc-cacheline-align-allocation ipc/util.c
--- a/ipc/util.c~ipc-utilc-ipc_rcu_alloc-cacheline-align-allocation
+++ a/ipc/util.c
@@ -467,9 +467,7 @@ void ipc_free(void* ptr, int size)
struct ipc_rcu {
struct rcu_head rcu;
atomic_t refcount;
- /* "void *" makes sure alignment of following data is sane. */
- void *data[0];
-};
+} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
/**
* ipc_rcu_alloc - allocate ipc and rcu space
@@ -487,12 +485,14 @@ void *ipc_rcu_alloc(int size)
if (unlikely(!out))
return NULL;
atomic_set(&out->refcount, 1);
- return out->data;
+ return out+1;
}
int ipc_rcu_getref(void *ptr)
{
- return atomic_inc_not_zero(&container_of(ptr, struct ipc_rcu, data)->refcount);
+ struct ipc_rcu *p = ((struct ipc_rcu*)ptr)-1;
+
+ return atomic_inc_not_zero(&p->refcount);
}
/**
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static void ipc_schedule_free(struct rcu
void ipc_rcu_putref(void *ptr)
{
- struct ipc_rcu *p = container_of(ptr, struct ipc_rcu, data);
+ struct ipc_rcu *p = ((struct ipc_rcu*)ptr)-1;
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&p->refcount))
return;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from manfred@colorfullife.com are
ipc-utilc-ipc_rcu_alloc-cacheline-align-allocation.patch
ipc-utilc-ipc_rcu_alloc-cacheline-align-allocation-checkpatch-fixes.patch
ipc-semc-cacheline-align-the-semaphore-structures.patch
ipc-sem-separate-wait-for-zero-and-alter-tasks-into-seperate-queues.patch
ipc-semc-always-use-only-one-queue-for-alter-operations.patch
ipc-semc-replace-shared-sem_otime-with-per-semaphore-value.patch
ipc-semc-rename-try_atomic_semop-to-perform_atomic_semop-docu-update.patch
slab-leaks3-default-y.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-06-11 22:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-11 22:15 + ipc-utilc-ipc_rcu_alloc-cacheline-align-allocation.patch added to -mm tree akpm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).