* [patch 095/114] radix-tree: make radix_tree_find_next_bit more useful
@ 2016-12-14 23:08 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: akpm @ 2016-12-14 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds, mm-commits, akpm, willy, kirill.shutemov, koct9i,
mawilcox, ross.zwisler, willy
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: radix-tree: make radix_tree_find_next_bit more useful
Since this function is specialised to the radix tree, pass in the node and
tag to calculate the address of the bitmap in radix_tree_find_next_bit()
instead of the caller. Likewise, there is no need to pass in the size of
the bitmap.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-52-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
lib/radix-tree.c | 17 +++++++----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -puN lib/radix-tree.c~radix-tree-make-radix_tree_find_next_bit-more-useful lib/radix-tree.c
--- a/lib/radix-tree.c~radix-tree-make-radix_tree_find_next_bit-more-useful
+++ a/lib/radix-tree.c
@@ -191,13 +191,12 @@ static inline int any_tag_set(struct rad
* Returns next bit offset, or size if nothing found.
*/
static __always_inline unsigned long
-radix_tree_find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
- unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
+radix_tree_find_next_bit(struct radix_tree_node *node, unsigned int tag,
+ unsigned long offset)
{
- if (!__builtin_constant_p(size))
- return find_next_bit(addr, size, offset);
+ const unsigned long *addr = node->tags[tag];
- if (offset < size) {
+ if (offset < RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE) {
unsigned long tmp;
addr += offset / BITS_PER_LONG;
@@ -205,14 +204,14 @@ radix_tree_find_next_bit(const unsigned
if (tmp)
return __ffs(tmp) + offset;
offset = (offset + BITS_PER_LONG) & ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
- while (offset < size) {
+ while (offset < RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE) {
tmp = *++addr;
if (tmp)
return __ffs(tmp) + offset;
offset += BITS_PER_LONG;
}
}
- return size;
+ return RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE;
}
#ifndef __KERNEL__
@@ -1160,9 +1159,7 @@ void **radix_tree_next_chunk(struct radi
return NULL;
if (flags & RADIX_TREE_ITER_TAGGED)
- offset = radix_tree_find_next_bit(
- node->tags[tag],
- RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE,
+ offset = radix_tree_find_next_bit(node, tag,
offset + 1);
else
while (++offset < RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE) {
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-12-14 23:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-14 23:08 [patch 095/114] radix-tree: make radix_tree_find_next_bit more useful akpm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).