* [PATCH v2 0/4] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process
@ 2021-06-15 1:31 Yonglong Li
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other Yonglong Li
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yonglong Li @ 2021-06-15 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Cc: pabeni, matthieu.baerts, mathew.j.martineau, geliangtang, Yonglong Li
fix issue: ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR use pm.add_signal to mark event, so
in some case pm.add_signal will be flush when ADD_ADDR/RM_ADDR in
process.
fix issue: if ADD_ADDR and ADD_ADDR-echo process at the same time,
only one event can write pm.add_signal. so ADD_ADDR will process
after add_timer timeout or ADD_ADDR-echo will not be process.
Patch 1 fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe clear addr_signal each other.
Patch 2 and 3 deal ADD_ADDR and ADD_ADDR-echo with separately to fix
conflicts in using pm.addr_signal porcess.
Patch 4 MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT is not necessary.
v1->v2:
- remove READ_ONCE under the pm spin lock.
Yonglong Li (4):
mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other
mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate
mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal
mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT
include/net/mptcp.h | 1 +
net/mptcp/options.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
net/mptcp/pm.c | 53 +++++++---------
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 10 ++-
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 31 ++++------
5 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other
2021-06-15 1:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process Yonglong Li
@ 2021-06-15 1:31 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-16 23:30 ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate Yonglong Li
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yonglong Li @ 2021-06-15 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Cc: pabeni, matthieu.baerts, mathew.j.martineau, geliangtang, Yonglong Li
ADD_ADDR share pm.addr_signal with RM_ADDR, so after RM_ADDR/ADD_ADDR
done we should not clean ADD_ADDR/RM_ADDR's addr_signal.
Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
---
net/mptcp/pm.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index 9d00fa6..74886a3 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_prio_received(struct sock *sk, u8 bkup)
bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr, bool *echo, bool *port)
{
+ u8 add_addr;
int ret = false;
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
@@ -267,7 +268,8 @@ bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
goto out_unlock;
*saddr = msk->pm.local;
- WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, 0);
+ add_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL);
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
ret = true;
out_unlock:
@@ -278,6 +280,7 @@ bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
{
+ u8 rm_addr;
int ret = false, len;
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
@@ -286,16 +289,17 @@ bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
if (!mptcp_pm_should_rm_signal(msk))
goto out_unlock;
+ rm_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & ~BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL);
len = mptcp_rm_addr_len(&msk->pm.rm_list_tx);
if (len < 0) {
- WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, 0);
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, rm_addr);
goto out_unlock;
}
if (remaining < len)
goto out_unlock;
*rm_list = msk->pm.rm_list_tx;
- WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, 0);
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, rm_addr);
ret = true;
out_unlock:
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/4] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate
2021-06-15 1:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process Yonglong Li
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other Yonglong Li
@ 2021-06-15 1:31 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-16 23:35 ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal Yonglong Li
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT Yonglong Li
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yonglong Li @ 2021-06-15 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Cc: pabeni, matthieu.baerts, mathew.j.martineau, geliangtang, Yonglong Li
MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL only for action of sending ADD_ADDR
MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO only for action of sending echo ADD_ADDR
add a mptcp_addr_info in struct mptcp_out_options for echo ADD_ADDR
to prepare for the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
---
include/net/mptcp.h | 1 +
net/mptcp/pm.c | 13 ++++++++-----
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 4 ++--
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h
index d61bbbf..637e90b 100644
--- a/include/net/mptcp.h
+++ b/include/net/mptcp.h
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct mptcp_out_options {
u64 rcvr_key;
u64 ahmac;
struct mptcp_addr_info addr;
+ struct mptcp_addr_info remote;
struct mptcp_rm_list rm_list;
u8 join_id;
u8 backup;
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index 74886a3..9966ed1 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_announce_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
{
u8 add_addr = READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal);
- pr_debug("msk=%p, local_id=%d", msk, addr->id);
+ pr_debug("msk=%p, local_id=%d, echo:%d", msk, addr->id, echo);
lockdep_assert_held(&msk->pm.lock);
@@ -27,10 +27,13 @@ int mptcp_pm_announce_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
return -EINVAL;
}
- msk->pm.local = *addr;
- add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
- if (echo)
+ if (echo) {
+ msk->pm.remote = *addr;
add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO);
+ } else {
+ msk->pm.local = *addr;
+ add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
+ }
if (addr->family == AF_INET6)
add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6);
if (addr->port)
@@ -214,7 +217,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_echoed(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
void mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
{
- if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk))
+ if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk))
return;
mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index c53e500..ae700bd 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -317,14 +317,14 @@ static void mptcp_pm_add_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
if (!entry->addr.id)
return;
- if (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk)) {
+ if (mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk)) {
sk_reset_timer(sk, timer, jiffies + TCP_RTO_MAX / 8);
goto out;
}
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
- if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk)) {
+ if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk)) {
pr_debug("retransmit ADD_ADDR id=%d", entry->addr.id);
mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, &entry->addr, false);
mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(msk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 6c2322e..d14d03e 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -708,6 +708,12 @@ void mptcp_event(enum mptcp_event_type type, const struct mptcp_sock *msk,
static inline bool mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
{
+ return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal) &
+ (BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL) | BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO));
+}
+
+static inline bool mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal) & BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal
2021-06-15 1:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process Yonglong Li
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other Yonglong Li
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate Yonglong Li
@ 2021-06-15 1:31 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-16 23:47 ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT Yonglong Li
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yonglong Li @ 2021-06-15 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Cc: pabeni, matthieu.baerts, mathew.j.martineau, geliangtang, Yonglong Li
according MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO flag build
ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option
add a suboptions type OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ECHO to mark as echo option
Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
---
net/mptcp/options.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
net/mptcp/pm.c | 32 ++++------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 13 +++--
3 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
index 1aec016..8875ba4 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/options.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
@@ -655,43 +655,72 @@ static bool mptcp_established_options_add_addr(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
bool drop_other_suboptions = false;
unsigned int opt_size = *size;
- bool echo;
- bool port;
+ struct mptcp_addr_info remote;
+ struct mptcp_addr_info local;
+ int ret = false;
+ u8 add_addr;
int len;
- if ((mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_ipv6(msk) ||
- mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_port(msk) ||
- mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) &&
- skb && skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
- pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
- opts->suboptions = 0;
- opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
- opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
- remaining += opt_size;
- drop_other_suboptions = true;
- }
-
- if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk) ||
- !(mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(msk, remaining, &opts->addr, &echo, &port)))
- return false;
-
- len = mptcp_add_addr_len(opts->addr.family, echo, port);
- if (remaining < len)
- return false;
-
- *size = len;
- if (drop_other_suboptions)
- *size -= opt_size;
- opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR;
- if (!echo) {
+ if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk))
+ goto out;
+
+ *size = 0;
+ mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(msk, &local, &remote, &add_addr);
+ if (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) {
+ if (skb && skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
+ pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
+ opts->suboptions = 0;
+ opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
+ opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
+ remaining += opt_size;
+ drop_other_suboptions = true;
+ }
+ len = mptcp_add_addr_len(remote.family, true, !!remote.port);
+ if (remaining < len && mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk))
+ goto add_addr;
+ else if (remaining < len)
+ goto out;
+ remaining -= len;
+ *size += len;
+ opts->remote = remote;
+ add_addr &= ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO);
+ opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ECHO;
+ pr_debug("addr_id=%d, echo=1, port=%d addr_signal:%x",
+ opts->remote.id, ntohs(opts->remote.port), add_addr);
+ } else if (mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk)) {
+add_addr:
+ if ((local.family == AF_INET6 || local.port) && skb &&
+ skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
+ pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
+ opts->suboptions = 0;
+ opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
+ opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
+ remaining += opt_size;
+ drop_other_suboptions = true;
+ }
+ len = mptcp_add_addr_len(local.family, false, !!local.port);
+ if (remaining < len)
+ goto out;
+ *size += len;
+ opts->addr = local;
opts->ahmac = add_addr_generate_hmac(msk->local_key,
msk->remote_key,
&opts->addr);
+ opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR;
+ add_addr &= ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
+ pr_debug("addr_id=%d, ahmac=%llu, echo=0, port=%d, addr_signal:%x",
+ opts->addr.id, opts->ahmac, ntohs(opts->addr.port), add_addr);
}
- pr_debug("addr_id=%d, ahmac=%llu, echo=%d, port=%d",
- opts->addr.id, opts->ahmac, echo, ntohs(opts->addr.port));
- return true;
+ if (drop_other_suboptions)
+ *size -= opt_size;
+ spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
+ ret = true;
+
+out:
+ return ret;
}
static bool mptcp_established_options_rm_addr(struct sock *sk,
@@ -1230,21 +1259,18 @@ void mptcp_write_options(__be32 *ptr, const struct tcp_sock *tp,
mp_capable_done:
if (OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR & opts->suboptions) {
u8 len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_BASE;
- u8 echo = MPTCP_ADDR_ECHO;
+ u8 echo = 0;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
if (opts->addr.family == AF_INET6)
len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR6_BASE;
#endif
+ len += sizeof(opts->ahmac);
+
if (opts->addr.port)
len += TCPOLEN_MPTCP_PORT_LEN;
- if (opts->ahmac) {
- len += sizeof(opts->ahmac);
- echo = 0;
- }
-
*ptr++ = mptcp_option(MPTCPOPT_ADD_ADDR,
len, echo, opts->addr.id);
if (opts->addr.family == AF_INET) {
@@ -1259,30 +1285,55 @@ void mptcp_write_options(__be32 *ptr, const struct tcp_sock *tp,
#endif
if (!opts->addr.port) {
- if (opts->ahmac) {
- put_unaligned_be64(opts->ahmac, ptr);
- ptr += 2;
- }
+ put_unaligned_be64(opts->ahmac, ptr);
+ ptr += 2;
} else {
u16 port = ntohs(opts->addr.port);
+ u8 *bptr = (u8 *)ptr;
- if (opts->ahmac) {
- u8 *bptr = (u8 *)ptr;
+ put_unaligned_be16(port, bptr);
+ bptr += 2;
+ put_unaligned_be64(opts->ahmac, bptr);
+ bptr += 8;
+ put_unaligned_be16(TCPOPT_NOP << 8 |
+ TCPOPT_NOP, bptr);
- put_unaligned_be16(port, bptr);
- bptr += 2;
- put_unaligned_be64(opts->ahmac, bptr);
- bptr += 8;
- put_unaligned_be16(TCPOPT_NOP << 8 |
- TCPOPT_NOP, bptr);
+ ptr += 3;
+ }
+ }
- ptr += 3;
- } else {
- put_unaligned_be32(port << 16 |
- TCPOPT_NOP << 8 |
- TCPOPT_NOP, ptr);
- ptr += 1;
- }
+ if (OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ECHO & opts->suboptions) {
+ u8 len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_BASE;
+ u8 echo = MPTCP_ADDR_ECHO;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
+ if (opts->remote.family == AF_INET6)
+ len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR6_BASE;
+#endif
+
+ if (opts->remote.port)
+ len += TCPOLEN_MPTCP_PORT_LEN;
+
+ *ptr++ = mptcp_option(MPTCPOPT_ADD_ADDR,
+ len, echo, opts->remote.id);
+ if (opts->remote.family == AF_INET) {
+ memcpy((u8 *)ptr, (u8 *)&opts->remote.addr.s_addr, 4);
+ ptr += 1;
+ }
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
+ else if (opts->remote.family == AF_INET6) {
+ memcpy((u8 *)ptr, opts->remote.addr6.s6_addr, 16);
+ ptr += 4;
+ }
+#endif
+
+ if (opts->remote.port) {
+ u16 port = ntohs(opts->remote.port);
+
+ put_unaligned_be32(port << 16 |
+ TCPOPT_NOP << 8 |
+ TCPOPT_NOP, ptr);
+ ptr += 1;
}
}
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index 9966ed1..6a5ee6da 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ int mptcp_pm_announce_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
lockdep_assert_held(&msk->pm.lock);
- if (add_addr) {
+ if (add_addr &
+ (echo ? BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO) : BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL))) {
pr_warn("addr_signal error, add_addr=%d", add_addr);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -252,32 +253,21 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_prio_received(struct sock *sk, u8 bkup)
/* path manager helpers */
-bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
- struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr, bool *echo, bool *port)
+bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr,
+ struct mptcp_addr_info *daddr, u8 *add_addr)
{
- u8 add_addr;
- int ret = false;
-
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
- /* double check after the lock is acquired */
- if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk))
- goto out_unlock;
-
- *echo = mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk);
- *port = mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_port(msk);
-
- if (remaining < mptcp_add_addr_len(msk->pm.local.family, *echo, *port))
- goto out_unlock;
-
*saddr = msk->pm.local;
- add_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL);
- WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
- ret = true;
+ *daddr = msk->pm.remote;
+ *add_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal;
-out_unlock:
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
- return ret;
+
+ if ((mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) && (mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk)))
+ mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK);
+
+ return true;
}
bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index d14d03e..25056c3 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -22,10 +22,11 @@
#define OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_SYNACK BIT(4)
#define OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_ACK BIT(5)
#define OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR BIT(6)
-#define OPTION_MPTCP_RM_ADDR BIT(7)
-#define OPTION_MPTCP_FASTCLOSE BIT(8)
-#define OPTION_MPTCP_PRIO BIT(9)
-#define OPTION_MPTCP_RST BIT(10)
+#define OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ECHO BIT(7)
+#define OPTION_MPTCP_RM_ADDR BIT(8)
+#define OPTION_MPTCP_FASTCLOSE BIT(9)
+#define OPTION_MPTCP_PRIO BIT(10)
+#define OPTION_MPTCP_RST BIT(11)
/* MPTCP option subtypes */
#define MPTCPOPT_MP_CAPABLE 0
@@ -760,8 +761,8 @@ static inline int mptcp_rm_addr_len(const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
return TCPOLEN_MPTCP_RM_ADDR_BASE + roundup(rm_list->nr - 1, 4) + 1;
}
-bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
- struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr, bool *echo, bool *port);
+bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr,
+ struct mptcp_addr_info *daddr, u8 *add_addr);
bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list);
int mptcp_pm_get_local_id(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock_common *skc);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/4] mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT
2021-06-15 1:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process Yonglong Li
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal Yonglong Li
@ 2021-06-15 1:31 ` Yonglong Li
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yonglong Li @ 2021-06-15 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Cc: pabeni, matthieu.baerts, mathew.j.martineau, geliangtang, Yonglong Li
there not need MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT, we can
get these info from pm.addr or pm.remote
Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
---
net/mptcp/pm.c | 4 ----
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 6 ++----
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 12 ------------
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index 6a5ee6da..2d9ee3c 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -35,10 +35,6 @@ int mptcp_pm_announce_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
msk->pm.local = *addr;
add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
}
- if (addr->family == AF_INET6)
- add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6);
- if (addr->port)
- add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT);
WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index ae700bd..2e67eca 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -544,10 +544,8 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
bool slow;
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
- pr_debug("send ack for %s%s%s",
- mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk) ? "add_addr" : "rm_addr",
- mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_ipv6(msk) ? " [ipv6]" : "",
- mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_port(msk) ? " [port]" : "");
+ pr_debug("send ack for %s",
+ mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk) ? "add_addr" : "rm_addr");
slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
tcp_send_ack(ssk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 25056c3..eaa19b9 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -176,8 +176,6 @@ enum mptcp_pm_status {
enum mptcp_addr_signal_status {
MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL,
MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO,
- MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6,
- MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT,
MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL,
};
@@ -723,16 +721,6 @@ static inline bool mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal) & BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO);
}
-static inline bool mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_ipv6(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
-{
- return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal) & BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6);
-}
-
-static inline bool mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_port(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
-{
- return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal) & BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT);
-}
-
static inline bool mptcp_pm_should_rm_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
{
return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal) & BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other Yonglong Li
@ 2021-06-16 23:30 ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-17 2:13 ` Yonglong Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mat Martineau @ 2021-06-16 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yonglong Li; +Cc: mptcp, pabeni, matthieu.baerts, geliangtang
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, Yonglong Li wrote:
> ADD_ADDR share pm.addr_signal with RM_ADDR, so after RM_ADDR/ADD_ADDR
> done we should not clean ADD_ADDR/RM_ADDR's addr_signal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> net/mptcp/pm.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> index 9d00fa6..74886a3 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_prio_received(struct sock *sk, u8 bkup)
> bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr, bool *echo, bool *port)
> {
> + u8 add_addr;
> int ret = false;
>
> spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
> @@ -267,7 +268,8 @@ bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> goto out_unlock;
>
> *saddr = msk->pm.local;
> - WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, 0);
> + add_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL);
Hello Yonglong, thank you for your revised patch series.
It would be better to use ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL), similar to the
change in mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal() below.
> + WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
> ret = true;
>
> out_unlock:
> @@ -278,6 +280,7 @@ bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
> {
> + u8 rm_addr;
> int ret = false, len;
>
> spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
> @@ -286,16 +289,17 @@ bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> if (!mptcp_pm_should_rm_signal(msk))
> goto out_unlock;
>
> + rm_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & ~BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL);
> len = mptcp_rm_addr_len(&msk->pm.rm_list_tx);
> if (len < 0) {
> - WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, 0);
> + WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, rm_addr);
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> if (remaining < len)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> *rm_list = msk->pm.rm_list_tx;
> - WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, 0);
> + WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, rm_addr);
> ret = true;
>
> out_unlock:
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate Yonglong Li
@ 2021-06-16 23:35 ` Mat Martineau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mat Martineau @ 2021-06-16 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yonglong Li; +Cc: mptcp, pabeni, matthieu.baerts, geliangtang
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, Yonglong Li wrote:
> MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL only for action of sending ADD_ADDR
> MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO only for action of sending echo ADD_ADDR
> add a mptcp_addr_info in struct mptcp_out_options for echo ADD_ADDR
>
> to prepare for the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> include/net/mptcp.h | 1 +
> net/mptcp/pm.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 4 ++--
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h
> index d61bbbf..637e90b 100644
> --- a/include/net/mptcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct mptcp_out_options {
> u64 rcvr_key;
> u64 ahmac;
> struct mptcp_addr_info addr;
> + struct mptcp_addr_info remote;
> struct mptcp_rm_list rm_list;
> u8 join_id;
> u8 backup;
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> index 74886a3..9966ed1 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_announce_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
> {
> u8 add_addr = READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal);
>
> - pr_debug("msk=%p, local_id=%d", msk, addr->id);
> + pr_debug("msk=%p, local_id=%d, echo:%d", msk, addr->id, echo);
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&msk->pm.lock);
>
> @@ -27,10 +27,13 @@ int mptcp_pm_announce_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - msk->pm.local = *addr;
> - add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
> - if (echo)
> + if (echo) {
> + msk->pm.remote = *addr;
> add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO);
> + } else {
> + msk->pm.local = *addr;
> + add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
> + }
> if (addr->family == AF_INET6)
> add_addr |= BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6);
> if (addr->port)
> @@ -214,7 +217,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_echoed(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
>
> void mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> {
> - if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk))
> + if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk))
> return;
>
> mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK);
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> index c53e500..ae700bd 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> @@ -317,14 +317,14 @@ static void mptcp_pm_add_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
> if (!entry->addr.id)
> return;
>
> - if (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk)) {
> + if (mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk)) {
> sk_reset_timer(sk, timer, jiffies + TCP_RTO_MAX / 8);
> goto out;
> }
>
> spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
>
> - if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk)) {
> + if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk)) {
> pr_debug("retransmit ADD_ADDR id=%d", entry->addr.id);
> mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, &entry->addr, false);
> mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(msk);
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index 6c2322e..d14d03e 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -708,6 +708,12 @@ void mptcp_event(enum mptcp_event_type type, const struct mptcp_sock *msk,
>
> static inline bool mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> {
> + return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal) &
> + (BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL) | BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO));
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
To fit with the naming of the other functions here, I suggest naming this
function mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_addr() instead.
> +{
> return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal) & BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal Yonglong Li
@ 2021-06-16 23:47 ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-17 2:31 ` Yonglong Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mat Martineau @ 2021-06-16 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yonglong Li; +Cc: mptcp, pabeni, matthieu.baerts, geliangtang
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, Yonglong Li wrote:
> according MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO flag build
> ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option
>
> add a suboptions type OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ECHO to mark as echo option
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> net/mptcp/options.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> net/mptcp/pm.c | 32 ++++------
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 13 +++--
> 3 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
> index 1aec016..8875ba4 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
> @@ -655,43 +655,72 @@ static bool mptcp_established_options_add_addr(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
> struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
> bool drop_other_suboptions = false;
> unsigned int opt_size = *size;
> - bool echo;
> - bool port;
> + struct mptcp_addr_info remote;
> + struct mptcp_addr_info local;
> + int ret = false;
> + u8 add_addr;
> int len;
>
> - if ((mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_ipv6(msk) ||
> - mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_port(msk) ||
> - mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) &&
> - skb && skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
> - pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
> - opts->suboptions = 0;
> - opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
> - opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
> - remaining += opt_size;
> - drop_other_suboptions = true;
> - }
> -
> - if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk) ||
> - !(mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(msk, remaining, &opts->addr, &echo, &port)))
> - return false;
> -
> - len = mptcp_add_addr_len(opts->addr.family, echo, port);
> - if (remaining < len)
> - return false;
> -
> - *size = len;
> - if (drop_other_suboptions)
> - *size -= opt_size;
> - opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR;
> - if (!echo) {
> + if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk))
> + goto out;
> +
> + *size = 0;
> + mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(msk, &local, &remote, &add_addr);
Return value of this function is ignored, so it shouldn't return bool
anymore. However, read below about locking and handling of the add_addr
value before making changes.
> + if (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) {
> + if (skb && skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
> + pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
> + opts->suboptions = 0;
> + opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
> + opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
> + remaining += opt_size;
> + drop_other_suboptions = true;
> + }
> + len = mptcp_add_addr_len(remote.family, true, !!remote.port);
> + if (remaining < len && mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk))
> + goto add_addr;
> + else if (remaining < len)
> + goto out;
> + remaining -= len;
> + *size += len;
> + opts->remote = remote;
> + add_addr &= ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO);
> + opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ECHO;
> + pr_debug("addr_id=%d, echo=1, port=%d addr_signal:%x",
> + opts->remote.id, ntohs(opts->remote.port), add_addr);
> + } else if (mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk)) {
> +add_addr:
> + if ((local.family == AF_INET6 || local.port) && skb &&
> + skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
> + pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
> + opts->suboptions = 0;
> + opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
> + opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
> + remaining += opt_size;
> + drop_other_suboptions = true;
> + }
> + len = mptcp_add_addr_len(local.family, false, !!local.port);
> + if (remaining < len)
> + goto out;
> + *size += len;
> + opts->addr = local;
> opts->ahmac = add_addr_generate_hmac(msk->local_key,
> msk->remote_key,
> &opts->addr);
> + opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR;
> + add_addr &= ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
> + pr_debug("addr_id=%d, ahmac=%llu, echo=0, port=%d, addr_signal:%x",
> + opts->addr.id, opts->ahmac, ntohs(opts->addr.port), add_addr);
> }
> - pr_debug("addr_id=%d, ahmac=%llu, echo=%d, port=%d",
> - opts->addr.id, opts->ahmac, echo, ntohs(opts->addr.port));
>
> - return true;
> + if (drop_other_suboptions)
> + *size -= opt_size;
> + spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
> + WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
It's not safe to do a read-modify-write of msk->pm.addr_signal if the pm
lock is not held for the *entire* time. Another thread could have set or
cleared any other bit in msk->pm_addr_signal while the lock was not held
here, and this code would overwrite any of those changes.
> + ret = true;
> +
> +out:
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static bool mptcp_established_options_rm_addr(struct sock *sk,
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other
2021-06-16 23:30 ` Mat Martineau
@ 2021-06-17 2:13 ` Yonglong Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yonglong Li @ 2021-06-17 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mat Martineau; +Cc: mptcp, pabeni, matthieu.baerts, geliangtang
On 2021/6/17 7:30, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, Yonglong Li wrote:
>
>> ADD_ADDR share pm.addr_signal with RM_ADDR, so after RM_ADDR/ADD_ADDR
>> done we should not clean ADD_ADDR/RM_ADDR's addr_signal.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
>> ---
>> net/mptcp/pm.c | 10 +++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
>> index 9d00fa6..74886a3 100644
>> --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
>> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
>> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_prio_received(struct sock *sk, u8 bkup)
>> bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
>> struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr, bool *echo, bool *port)
>> {
>> + u8 add_addr;
>> int ret = false;
>>
>> spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
>> @@ -267,7 +268,8 @@ bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
>> goto out_unlock;
>>
>> *saddr = msk->pm.local;
>> - WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, 0);
>> + add_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL);
>
> Hello Yonglong, thank you for your revised patch series.
>
> It would be better to use ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL), similar to the change in
Hi Mat, Thanks for your review.
If use ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL), MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO maybe not being clean out. MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO
and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL are being set with pm.lock at the same time, So I think here use
BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL) is ok.
mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal() below.
>
>> + WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
>> ret = true;
>>
>> out_unlock:
>> @@ -278,6 +280,7 @@ bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
>> bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
>> struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
>> {
>> + u8 rm_addr;
>> int ret = false, len;
>>
>> spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
>> @@ -286,16 +289,17 @@ bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
>> if (!mptcp_pm_should_rm_signal(msk))
>> goto out_unlock;
>>
>> + rm_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & ~BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL);
>> len = mptcp_rm_addr_len(&msk->pm.rm_list_tx);
>> if (len < 0) {
>> - WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, 0);
>> + WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, rm_addr);
>> goto out_unlock;
>> }
>> if (remaining < len)
>> goto out_unlock;
>>
>> *rm_list = msk->pm.rm_list_tx;
>> - WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, 0);
>> + WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, rm_addr);
>> ret = true;
>>
>> out_unlock:
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>>
>
> --
> Mat Martineau
> Intel
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal
2021-06-16 23:47 ` Mat Martineau
@ 2021-06-17 2:31 ` Yonglong Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yonglong Li @ 2021-06-17 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mat Martineau; +Cc: mptcp, pabeni, matthieu.baerts, geliangtang
On 2021/6/17 7:47, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, Yonglong Li wrote:
>
>> according MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO flag build
>> ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option
>>
>> add a suboptions type OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ECHO to mark as echo option
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
>> ---
>> net/mptcp/options.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> net/mptcp/pm.c | 32 ++++------
>> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 13 +++--
>> 3 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
>> index 1aec016..8875ba4 100644
>> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
>> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
>> @@ -655,43 +655,72 @@ static bool mptcp_established_options_add_addr(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
>> struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
>> bool drop_other_suboptions = false;
>> unsigned int opt_size = *size;
>> - bool echo;
>> - bool port;
>> + struct mptcp_addr_info remote;
>> + struct mptcp_addr_info local;
>> + int ret = false;
>> + u8 add_addr;
>> int len;
>>
>> - if ((mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_ipv6(msk) ||
>> - mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_port(msk) ||
>> - mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) &&
>> - skb && skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
>> - pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
>> - opts->suboptions = 0;
>> - opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
>> - opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
>> - remaining += opt_size;
>> - drop_other_suboptions = true;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk) ||
>> - !(mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(msk, remaining, &opts->addr, &echo, &port)))
>> - return false;
>> -
>> - len = mptcp_add_addr_len(opts->addr.family, echo, port);
>> - if (remaining < len)
>> - return false;
>> -
>> - *size = len;
>> - if (drop_other_suboptions)
>> - *size -= opt_size;
>> - opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR;
>> - if (!echo) {
>> + if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + *size = 0;
>> + mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(msk, &local, &remote, &add_addr);
>
> Return value of this function is ignored, so it shouldn't return bool anymore. However, read below about locking and handling of the add_addr value before making changes.
>
>> + if (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) {
>> + if (skb && skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
>> + pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
>> + opts->suboptions = 0;
>> + opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
>> + opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
>> + remaining += opt_size;
>> + drop_other_suboptions = true;
>> + }
>> + len = mptcp_add_addr_len(remote.family, true, !!remote.port);
>> + if (remaining < len && mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk))
>> + goto add_addr;
>> + else if (remaining < len)
>> + goto out;
>> + remaining -= len;
>> + *size += len;
>> + opts->remote = remote;
>> + add_addr &= ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO);
>> + opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ECHO;
>> + pr_debug("addr_id=%d, echo=1, port=%d addr_signal:%x",
>> + opts->remote.id, ntohs(opts->remote.port), add_addr);
>> + } else if (mptcp_pm_should_add_addr(msk)) {
>> +add_addr:
>> + if ((local.family == AF_INET6 || local.port) && skb &&
>> + skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
>> + pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
>> + opts->suboptions = 0;
>> + opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
>> + opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
>> + remaining += opt_size;
>> + drop_other_suboptions = true;
>> + }
>> + len = mptcp_add_addr_len(local.family, false, !!local.port);
>> + if (remaining < len)
>> + goto out;
>> + *size += len;
>> + opts->addr = local;
>> opts->ahmac = add_addr_generate_hmac(msk->local_key,
>> msk->remote_key,
>> &opts->addr);
>> + opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR;
>> + add_addr &= ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
>> + pr_debug("addr_id=%d, ahmac=%llu, echo=0, port=%d, addr_signal:%x",
>> + opts->addr.id, opts->ahmac, ntohs(opts->addr.port), add_addr);
>> }
>> - pr_debug("addr_id=%d, ahmac=%llu, echo=%d, port=%d",
>> - opts->addr.id, opts->ahmac, echo, ntohs(opts->addr.port));
>>
>> - return true;
>> + if (drop_other_suboptions)
>> + *size -= opt_size;
>> + spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
>> + WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
>
> It's not safe to do a read-modify-write of msk->pm.addr_signal if the pm lock is not held for the *entire* time. Another thread could have set or cleared any other bit in msk->pm_addr_signal while the lock was not held here, and this code would overwrite any of those changes.
right. Thanks for you review. I will prepare v2 patch.
>
>> + ret = true;
>> +
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static bool mptcp_established_options_rm_addr(struct sock *sk,
>
> --
> Mat Martineau
> Intel
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-17 2:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-15 1:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process Yonglong Li
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other Yonglong Li
2021-06-16 23:30 ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-17 2:13 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate Yonglong Li
2021-06-16 23:35 ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal Yonglong Li
2021-06-16 23:47 ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-17 2:31 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-15 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT Yonglong Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).