mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler
@ 2022-06-23 14:54 Geliang Tang
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 1/6] Squash to "mptcp: add get_subflow wrappers" Geliang Tang
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-06-23 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

v9:
 - drop the extra *err paramenter of mptcp_sched_get_send() as Florian
   suggested.

v8:
 - update __mptcp_push_pending(), send the same data on each subflow.
 - update __mptcp_retrans, track the max sent data.
 = add a new patch.

v7:
 - drop redundant flag in v6
 - drop __mptcp_subflows_push_pending in v6
 - update redundant subflows support in __mptcp_push_pending
 - update redundant subflows support in __mptcp_retrans

v6:
 - Add redundant flag for struct mptcp_sched_ops.
 - add a dedicated function __mptcp_subflows_push_pending() to deal with
   redundat subflows push pending.

v5:
 - address to Paolo's comment, keep the optimization to
mptcp_subflow_get_send() for the non eBPF case.
 - merge mptcp_sched_get_send() and __mptcp_sched_get_send() in v4 into one.
 - depends on "cleanups for bpf sched selftests".

v4:
 - small cleanups in patch 1, 2.
 - add TODO in patch 3.
 - rebase patch 5 on 'cleanups for bpf sched selftests'.

v3:
 - use new API.
 - fix the link failure tests issue mentioned in ("https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/cover/cover.1653033459.git.geliang.tang@suse.com/").

v2:
 - add MPTCP_SUBFLOWS_MAX limit to avoid infinite loops when the
   scheduler always sets call_again to true.
 - track the largest copied amount.
 - deal with __mptcp_subflow_push_pending() and the retransmit loop.
 - depends on "BPF round-robin scheduler" v14.

v1:

Implements the redundant BPF MPTCP scheduler, which sends all packets
redundantly on all available subflows.

Geliang Tang (6):
  Squash to "mptcp: add get_subflow wrappers"
  mptcp: accept right edge of mapping validating
  mptcp: redundant subflows push pending
  mptcp: redundant subflows retrans support
  selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red scheduler
  selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red test

 net/mptcp/protocol.c                          | 160 +++++++++++-------
 net/mptcp/protocol.h                          |   2 +-
 net/mptcp/sched.c                             |  56 +++---
 net/mptcp/subflow.c                           |   4 +-
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  |  34 ++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c       |  36 ++++
 6 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c

-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH mptcp-next v9 1/6] Squash to "mptcp: add get_subflow wrappers"
  2022-06-23 14:54 [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-23 14:54 ` Geliang Tang
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 2/6] mptcp: accept right edge of mapping validating Geliang Tang
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-06-23 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

Please update the commit log:

'''
This patch defines two new wrappers mptcp_sched_get_send() and
mptcp_sched_get_retrans(), invoke get_subflow() of msk->sched in them.
Use them instead of using mptcp_subflow_get_send() or
mptcp_subflow_get_retrans() directly.

Set the subflow pointers array in struct mptcp_sched_data before invoking
get_subflow(), then it can be used in get_subflow() in the BPF contexts.

Check the subflow scheduled flags to test which subflow or subflows are
picked by the scheduler.

Move sock_owned_by_me() and the fallback check code from
mptcp_subflow_get_send/retrans() into the wrappers.

Redundant subflows are not supported in __mptcp_subflow_push_pending()
yet. This patch adds a placeholder in mptcp_sched_get_send() to pick the
first subflow for the redundant subflows case.
'''

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c |  4 ++--
 net/mptcp/protocol.h |  2 +-
 net/mptcp/sched.c    | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index b1fae2f747c9..6e44786e01fd 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 			int ret = 0;
 
 			prev_ssk = ssk;
-			ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk);
+			ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_send(msk);
 
 			/* First check. If the ssk has changed since
 			 * the last round, release prev_ssk
@@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
 	mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
 
 	/* first check ssk: need to kick "stale" logic */
-	ssk = mptcp_sched_get_retrans(msk);
+	ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(msk);
 	dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
 	if (!dfrag) {
 		if (mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk)) {
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 95c9ace1437b..af414cd8b7cd 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ void mptcp_subflow_set_scheduled(struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow,
 struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_send(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
 struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
 struct sock *mptcp_sched_get_send(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
-struct sock *mptcp_sched_get_retrans(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
+int mptcp_sched_get_retrans(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
 
 static inline bool __mptcp_subflow_active(struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow)
 {
diff --git a/net/mptcp/sched.c b/net/mptcp/sched.c
index 8858e1fc8b74..85c1fe85399d 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/sched.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/sched.c
@@ -114,34 +114,46 @@ static int mptcp_sched_data_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, bool reinject,
 	for (; i < MPTCP_SUBFLOWS_MAX; i++)
 		data->contexts[i] = NULL;
 
+	msk->snd_burst = 0;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
 struct sock *mptcp_sched_get_send(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 {
+	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
 	struct mptcp_sched_data data;
 	struct sock *ssk = NULL;
-	int i;
 
 	sock_owned_by_me((struct sock *)msk);
 
 	/* the following check is moved out of mptcp_subflow_get_send */
 	if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk)) {
-		if (!msk->first)
-			return NULL;
-		return sk_stream_memory_free(msk->first) ? msk->first : NULL;
+		if (msk->first && sk_stream_memory_free(msk->first)) {
+			mptcp_subflow_set_scheduled(mptcp_subflow_ctx(msk->first), true);
+			return msk->first;
+		}
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	if (!msk->sched)
-		return mptcp_subflow_get_send(msk);
+	if (!msk->sched) {
+		ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_send(msk);
+		if (ssk)
+			mptcp_subflow_set_scheduled(mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk), true);
+		return ssk;
+	}
 
 	mptcp_sched_data_init(msk, false, &data);
 	msk->sched->get_subflow(msk, &data);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < MPTCP_SUBFLOWS_MAX; i++) {
-		if (data.contexts[i] && READ_ONCE(data.contexts[i]->scheduled)) {
-			ssk = data.contexts[i]->tcp_sock;
-			msk->last_snd = ssk;
+	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+		if (READ_ONCE(subflow->scheduled)) {
+			/* TODO: Redundant subflows are not supported in
+			 * __mptcp_subflow_push_pending() yet. Here's a
+			 * placeholder to pick the first subflow for the
+			 * redundant subflows case.
+			 */
+			ssk = subflow->tcp_sock;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
@@ -149,31 +161,27 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sched_get_send(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	return ssk;
 }
 
-struct sock *mptcp_sched_get_retrans(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+int mptcp_sched_get_retrans(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 {
 	struct mptcp_sched_data data;
 	struct sock *ssk = NULL;
-	int i;
 
 	sock_owned_by_me((const struct sock *)msk);
 
 	/* the following check is moved out of mptcp_subflow_get_retrans */
 	if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk))
-		return NULL;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!msk->sched)
-		return mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(msk);
+	if (!msk->sched) {
+		ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(msk);
+		if (!ssk)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		mptcp_subflow_set_scheduled(mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk), true);
+		return 0;
+	}
 
 	mptcp_sched_data_init(msk, true, &data);
 	msk->sched->get_subflow(msk, &data);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < MPTCP_SUBFLOWS_MAX; i++) {
-		if (data.contexts[i] && READ_ONCE(data.contexts[i]->scheduled)) {
-			ssk = data.contexts[i]->tcp_sock;
-			msk->last_snd = ssk;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return ssk;
+	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH mptcp-next v9 2/6] mptcp: accept right edge of mapping validating
  2022-06-23 14:54 [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Geliang Tang
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 1/6] Squash to "mptcp: add get_subflow wrappers" Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-23 14:54 ` Geliang Tang
  2022-06-24  0:59   ` Mat Martineau
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 3/6] mptcp: redundant subflows push pending Geliang Tang
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-06-23 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

If ssn is at the right edge of DSS mapping (ssn == subflow->map_subflow_seq
 + subflow->map_data_len), it shouldn't be handled as a bad map. This
happens in the redundant subflows test cases.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/subflow.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 63e8892ec807..69a2c3e6fd76 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -878,8 +878,8 @@ static bool validate_mapping(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		dbg_bad_map(subflow, ssn);
 		return false;
 	}
-	if (unlikely(!before(ssn, subflow->map_subflow_seq +
-				  subflow->map_data_len))) {
+	if (unlikely(after(ssn, subflow->map_subflow_seq +
+				subflow->map_data_len))) {
 		/* Mapping does covers past subflow data, invalid */
 		dbg_bad_map(subflow, ssn);
 		return false;
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH mptcp-next v9 3/6] mptcp: redundant subflows push pending
  2022-06-23 14:54 [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Geliang Tang
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 1/6] Squash to "mptcp: add get_subflow wrappers" Geliang Tang
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 2/6] mptcp: accept right edge of mapping validating Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-23 14:54 ` Geliang Tang
  2022-06-24  1:20   ` Mat Martineau
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 4/6] mptcp: redundant subflows retrans support Geliang Tang
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-06-23 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

This patch adds the redundant subflows support for __mptcp_push_pending().
Use mptcp_sched_get_send() wrapper instead of mptcp_subflow_get_send()
in it.

Check the subflow scheduled flags to test which subflow or subflows are
picked by the scheduler, use them to send data.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 6e44786e01fd..d09b01f1dc29 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1516,63 +1516,79 @@ void mptcp_check_and_set_pending(struct sock *sk)
 
 void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 {
-	struct sock *prev_ssk = NULL, *ssk = NULL;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
-	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
-				.flags = flags,
-	};
+	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
-	int len, copied = 0;
+	int len, max = 0;
 
-	while ((dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk))) {
-		info.sent = dfrag->already_sent;
-		info.limit = dfrag->data_len;
-		len = dfrag->data_len - dfrag->already_sent;
-		while (len > 0) {
-			int ret = 0;
+	if (!mptcp_sched_get_send(msk))
+		goto out;
 
-			prev_ssk = ssk;
-			ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_send(msk);
+	dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk);
+	if (!dfrag)
+		goto out;
 
-			/* First check. If the ssk has changed since
-			 * the last round, release prev_ssk
-			 */
-			if (ssk != prev_ssk && prev_ssk)
-				mptcp_push_release(prev_ssk, &info);
-			if (!ssk)
-				goto out;
+	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+		if (READ_ONCE(subflow->scheduled)) {
+			struct sock *prev_ssk = NULL, *ssk = NULL;
+			struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
+				.flags = flags,
+			};
+			int copied = 0;
 
-			/* Need to lock the new subflow only if different
-			 * from the previous one, otherwise we are still
-			 * helding the relevant lock
-			 */
-			if (ssk != prev_ssk)
-				lock_sock(ssk);
+			info.sent = dfrag->already_sent;
+			info.limit = dfrag->data_len;
+			len = dfrag->data_len - dfrag->already_sent;
+			while (len > 0) {
+				int ret = 0;
 
-			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
-			if (ret <= 0) {
-				mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
-				goto out;
-			}
+				prev_ssk = ssk;
+				ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
 
-			info.sent += ret;
-			copied += ret;
-			len -= ret;
+				/* First check. If the ssk has changed since
+				 * the last round, release prev_ssk
+				 */
+				if (ssk != prev_ssk && prev_ssk)
+					mptcp_push_release(prev_ssk, &info);
+				if (!ssk)
+					goto out;
+
+				/* Need to lock the new subflow only if different
+				 * from the previous one, otherwise we are still
+				 * helding the relevant lock
+				 */
+				if (ssk != prev_ssk)
+					lock_sock(ssk);
+
+				ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
+				if (ret <= 0) {
+					mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
+					goto out;
+				}
+
+				info.sent += ret;
+				copied += ret;
+				len -= ret;
+			}
+			max = max(copied, max);
 
-			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
+			/* at this point we held the socket lock for the last subflow we used */
+			if (ssk) {
+				mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
+				msk->last_snd = ssk;
+				mptcp_subflow_set_scheduled(subflow, false);
+			}
 		}
-		WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));
 	}
-
-	/* at this point we held the socket lock for the last subflow we used */
-	if (ssk)
-		mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
+	if (max)
+		mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, max);
+	WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));
 
 out:
 	/* ensure the rtx timer is running */
 	if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
 		mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
-	if (copied)
+	if (max)
 		__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
 }
 
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH mptcp-next v9 4/6] mptcp: redundant subflows retrans support
  2022-06-23 14:54 [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Geliang Tang
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 3/6] mptcp: redundant subflows push pending Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-23 14:54 ` Geliang Tang
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red scheduler Geliang Tang
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-06-23 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

This patch adds the redundant subflows support for __mptcp_retrans(). In
it, use sched_get_retrans() wrapper instead of mptcp_subflow_get_retrans().

Iterate each subflow of msk, check the scheduled flag to test if it is
picked by the scheduler. If so, use it to send data.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index d09b01f1dc29..0390f3d951ca 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2415,16 +2415,17 @@ static void mptcp_check_fastclose(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
 	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {};
 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
-	size_t copied = 0;
 	struct sock *ssk;
-	int ret;
+	int ret, err;
+	u16 max = 0;
 
 	mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
 
 	/* first check ssk: need to kick "stale" logic */
-	ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(msk);
+	err = mptcp_sched_get_retrans(msk);
 	dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
 	if (!dfrag) {
 		if (mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk)) {
@@ -2443,31 +2444,46 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
 		goto reset_timer;
 	}
 
-	if (!ssk)
+	if (err)
 		goto reset_timer;
 
-	lock_sock(ssk);
+	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+		if (READ_ONCE(subflow->scheduled)) {
+			u16 copied = 0;
 
-	/* limit retransmission to the bytes already sent on some subflows */
-	info.sent = 0;
-	info.limit = READ_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled) ? dfrag->data_len : dfrag->already_sent;
-	while (info.sent < info.limit) {
-		ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
-		if (ret <= 0)
-			break;
+			ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+			if (!ssk)
+				goto reset_timer;
 
-		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RETRANSSEGS);
-		copied += ret;
-		info.sent += ret;
-	}
-	if (copied) {
-		dfrag->already_sent = max(dfrag->already_sent, info.sent);
-		tcp_push(ssk, 0, info.mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
-			 info.size_goal);
-		WRITE_ONCE(msk->allow_infinite_fallback, false);
-	}
+			lock_sock(ssk);
 
-	release_sock(ssk);
+			/* limit retransmission to the bytes already sent on some subflows */
+			info.sent = 0;
+			info.limit = READ_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled) ? dfrag->data_len :
+								    dfrag->already_sent;
+			while (info.sent < info.limit) {
+				ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
+				if (ret <= 0)
+					break;
+
+				MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RETRANSSEGS);
+				copied += ret;
+				info.sent += ret;
+			}
+			if (copied) {
+				max = max(copied, max);
+				tcp_push(ssk, 0, info.mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
+					 info.size_goal);
+				WRITE_ONCE(msk->allow_infinite_fallback, false);
+			}
+
+			release_sock(ssk);
+
+			msk->last_snd = ssk;
+			mptcp_subflow_set_scheduled(subflow, false);
+		}
+	}
+	dfrag->already_sent = max(dfrag->already_sent, max);
 
 reset_timer:
 	mptcp_check_and_set_pending(sk);
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH mptcp-next v9 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red scheduler
  2022-06-23 14:54 [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Geliang Tang
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 4/6] mptcp: redundant subflows retrans support Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-23 14:54 ` Geliang Tang
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red test Geliang Tang
  2022-06-23 14:57 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Matthieu Baerts
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-06-23 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

This patch implements the redundant BPF MPTCP scheduler, named bpf_red,
which sends all packets redundantly on all available subflows.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c       | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..58f90473e495
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2022, SUSE. */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include "bpf_tcp_helpers.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+SEC("struct_ops/mptcp_sched_red_init")
+void BPF_PROG(mptcp_sched_red_init, const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/mptcp_sched_red_release")
+void BPF_PROG(mptcp_sched_red_release, const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
+}
+
+void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(bpf_red_get_subflow, const struct mptcp_sock *msk,
+		    struct mptcp_sched_data *data)
+{
+	for (int i = 0; i < MPTCP_SUBFLOWS_MAX; i++) {
+		if (!data->contexts[i])
+			break;
+
+		mptcp_subflow_set_scheduled(data->contexts[i], true);
+	}
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops")
+struct mptcp_sched_ops red = {
+	.init		= (void *)mptcp_sched_red_init,
+	.release	= (void *)mptcp_sched_red_release,
+	.get_subflow	= (void *)bpf_red_get_subflow,
+	.name		= "bpf_red",
+};
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH mptcp-next v9 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red test
  2022-06-23 14:54 [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Geliang Tang
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red scheduler Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-23 14:54 ` Geliang Tang
  2022-06-23 16:20   ` selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red test: Tests Results MPTCP CI
  2022-06-23 14:57 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Matthieu Baerts
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-06-23 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

This patch adds the redundant BPF MPTCP scheduler test: test_red(). Use
sysctl to set net.mptcp.scheduler to use this sched. Add two veth net
devices to simulate the multiple addresses case. Use 'ip mptcp endpoint'
command to add the new endpoint ADDR_2 to PM netlink. Send data and check
bytes_sent of 'ss' output after it to make sure the data has been
redundantly sent on both net devices.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index 647d313475bc..8426a5aba721 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 #include "mptcp_bpf_first.skel.h"
 #include "mptcp_bpf_bkup.skel.h"
 #include "mptcp_bpf_rr.skel.h"
+#include "mptcp_bpf_red.skel.h"
 
 #ifndef TCP_CA_NAME_MAX
 #define TCP_CA_NAME_MAX	16
@@ -381,6 +382,37 @@ static void test_rr(void)
 	mptcp_bpf_rr__destroy(rr_skel);
 }
 
+static void test_red(void)
+{
+	struct mptcp_bpf_red *red_skel;
+	int server_fd, client_fd;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+
+	red_skel = mptcp_bpf_red__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(red_skel, "bpf_red__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(red_skel->maps.red);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_map__attach_struct_ops")) {
+		mptcp_bpf_red__destroy(red_skel);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	sched_init("subflow", "bpf_red");
+	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, 0, 0);
+	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
+
+	send_data(server_fd, client_fd);
+	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "has_bytes_sent addr 1");
+	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), "has_bytes_sent addr 2");
+
+	close(client_fd);
+	close(server_fd);
+	sched_cleanup();
+	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+	mptcp_bpf_red__destroy(red_skel);
+}
+
 void test_mptcp(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("base"))
@@ -391,4 +423,6 @@ void test_mptcp(void)
 		test_bkup();
 	if (test__start_subtest("rr"))
 		test_rr();
+	if (test__start_subtest("red"))
+		test_red();
 }
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler
  2022-06-23 14:54 [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Geliang Tang
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red test Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-23 14:57 ` Matthieu Baerts
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2022-06-23 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

On 23/06/2022 16:54, Geliang Tang wrote:
> v9:
>  - drop the extra *err paramenter of mptcp_sched_get_send() as Florian
>    suggested.

Just to be sure, did you see the last report from the CI:


- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Unstable: 3 failed test(s): mptcp_connect_mmap
selftest_mptcp_connect selftest_simult_flows - Critical: 2 Call Trace(s) ❌:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6077066394206208
  - Summary:
https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6077066394206208/summary/summary.txt


- KVM Validation: debug:
  - Unstable: 3 failed test(s): selftest_mptcp_connect
selftest_mptcp_join selftest_simult_flows - Critical: 2 Call Trace(s) ❌:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5514116440784896
  - Summary:
https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5514116440784896/summary/summary.txt

I guess it is linked to your modifications, no?

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red test: Tests Results
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red test Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-23 16:20   ` MPTCP CI
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2022-06-23 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Unstable: 3 failed test(s): mptcp_connect_mmap selftest_mptcp_connect selftest_simult_flows - Critical: 2 Call Trace(s) ❌:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6417549658161152
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6417549658161152/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug:
  - Unstable: 4 failed test(s): mptcp_connect_mmap selftest_mptcp_connect selftest_mptcp_join selftest_simult_flows - Critical: 2 Call Trace(s) ❌:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5010174774607872
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5010174774607872/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/4187f41ea008


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (Tessares)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v9 2/6] mptcp: accept right edge of mapping validating
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 2/6] mptcp: accept right edge of mapping validating Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-24  0:59   ` Mat Martineau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mat Martineau @ 2022-06-24  0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, Geliang Tang wrote:

> If ssn is at the right edge of DSS mapping (ssn == subflow->map_subflow_seq
> + subflow->map_data_len), it shouldn't be handled as a bad map. This
> happens in the redundant subflows test cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
> ---
> net/mptcp/subflow.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
> index 63e8892ec807..69a2c3e6fd76 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
> @@ -878,8 +878,8 @@ static bool validate_mapping(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> 		dbg_bad_map(subflow, ssn);
> 		return false;
> 	}
> -	if (unlikely(!before(ssn, subflow->map_subflow_seq +
> -				  subflow->map_data_len))) {
> +	if (unlikely(after(ssn, subflow->map_subflow_seq +
> +				subflow->map_data_len))) {

I'm not sure this correct.

For example, if subflow->map_data_len == 1, then ssn can only be equal to 
subflow->map_subflow_seq. Changing this to after() allows the skb to 
include an extra byte that isn't covered by the mapping.

> 		/* Mapping does covers past subflow data, invalid */
> 		dbg_bad_map(subflow, ssn);
> 		return false;
> -- 
> 2.35.3
>
>
>

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v9 3/6] mptcp: redundant subflows push pending
  2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 3/6] mptcp: redundant subflows push pending Geliang Tang
@ 2022-06-24  1:20   ` Mat Martineau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mat Martineau @ 2022-06-24  1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, Geliang Tang wrote:

> This patch adds the redundant subflows support for __mptcp_push_pending().
> Use mptcp_sched_get_send() wrapper instead of mptcp_subflow_get_send()
> in it.
>
> Check the subflow scheduled flags to test which subflow or subflows are
> picked by the scheduler, use them to send data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 6e44786e01fd..d09b01f1dc29 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -1516,63 +1516,79 @@ void mptcp_check_and_set_pending(struct sock *sk)
>
> void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
> {
> -	struct sock *prev_ssk = NULL, *ssk = NULL;
> 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> -	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
> -				.flags = flags,
> -	};
> +	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
> -	int len, copied = 0;
> +	int len, max = 0;
>
> -	while ((dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk))) {
> -		info.sent = dfrag->already_sent;
> -		info.limit = dfrag->data_len;
> -		len = dfrag->data_len - dfrag->already_sent;
> -		while (len > 0) {
> -			int ret = 0;
> +	if (!mptcp_sched_get_send(msk))
> +		goto out;
>
> -			prev_ssk = ssk;
> -			ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_send(msk);
> +	dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk);

I think the looping structure in v7 was closer to what is needed.

Each subflow needs to be able to send from multiple dfrags if they are 
able to.

> +	if (!dfrag)
> +		goto out;
>
> -			/* First check. If the ssk has changed since
> -			 * the last round, release prev_ssk
> -			 */
> -			if (ssk != prev_ssk && prev_ssk)
> -				mptcp_push_release(prev_ssk, &info);
> -			if (!ssk)
> -				goto out;
> +	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
> +		if (READ_ONCE(subflow->scheduled)) {
> +			struct sock *prev_ssk = NULL, *ssk = NULL;
> +			struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
> +				.flags = flags,
> +			};
> +			int copied = 0;
>
> -			/* Need to lock the new subflow only if different
> -			 * from the previous one, otherwise we are still
> -			 * helding the relevant lock
> -			 */
> -			if (ssk != prev_ssk)
> -				lock_sock(ssk);


There still needs to be a loop here (like in v7) that allows multiple 
calls to mptcp_sendmsg_frag(). Each subflow *starts* sending at the 
initial dfrag, but can send any amount of data from the available list of 
dfrags. If msk->first_pending has not been updated until after all 
subflows are done, that can be used as the starting point for each 
subflow.


> +			info.sent = dfrag->already_sent;
> +			info.limit = dfrag->data_len;
> +			len = dfrag->data_len - dfrag->already_sent;
> +			while (len > 0) {
> +				int ret = 0;
>
> -			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
> -			if (ret <= 0) {
> -				mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
> -				goto out;
> -			}
> +				prev_ssk = ssk;
> +				ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
>
> -			info.sent += ret;
> -			copied += ret;
> -			len -= ret;
> +				/* First check. If the ssk has changed since
> +				 * the last round, release prev_ssk
> +				 */
> +				if (ssk != prev_ssk && prev_ssk)
> +					mptcp_push_release(prev_ssk, &info);
> +				if (!ssk)
> +					goto out;
> +
> +				/* Need to lock the new subflow only if different
> +				 * from the previous one, otherwise we are still
> +				 * helding the relevant lock
> +				 */
> +				if (ssk != prev_ssk)
> +					lock_sock(ssk);
> +
> +				ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
> +				if (ret <= 0) {
> +					mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
> +					goto out;
> +				}
> +
> +				info.sent += ret;
> +				copied += ret;
> +				len -= ret;
> +			}
> +			max = max(copied, max);

Would be good to use a variable name other than "max" so it doesn't match 
the macro name here.

>
> -			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
> +			/* at this point we held the socket lock for the last subflow we used */
> +			if (ssk) {
> +				mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
> +				msk->last_snd = ssk;
> +				mptcp_subflow_set_scheduled(subflow, false);
> +			}
> 		}
> -		WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));
> 	}
> -
> -	/* at this point we held the socket lock for the last subflow we used */
> -	if (ssk)
> -		mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
> +	if (max)
> +		mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, max);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));

With the notes above on supporting multiple dfrags, 
mptcp_update_post_push() also will need to be more complicated. It will 
have to update all dfrags that were sent.

>
> out:
> 	/* ensure the rtx timer is running */
> 	if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
> 		mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
> -	if (copied)
> +	if (max)
> 		__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
> }
>
> -- 
> 2.35.3
>
>
>

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-24  1:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-23 14:54 [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Geliang Tang
2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 1/6] Squash to "mptcp: add get_subflow wrappers" Geliang Tang
2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 2/6] mptcp: accept right edge of mapping validating Geliang Tang
2022-06-24  0:59   ` Mat Martineau
2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 3/6] mptcp: redundant subflows push pending Geliang Tang
2022-06-24  1:20   ` Mat Martineau
2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 4/6] mptcp: redundant subflows retrans support Geliang Tang
2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red scheduler Geliang Tang
2022-06-23 14:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red test Geliang Tang
2022-06-23 16:20   ` selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red test: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2022-06-23 14:57 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v9 0/6] BPF redundant scheduler Matthieu Baerts

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).