mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4 mptcp-next 2/4] mptcp: drop SK_RECLAIM_* macros
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 18:27:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7884c6176c0dc56361a5cc365215333b5b81ec2.1655828070.git.pabeni@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <630f7e13d7226f8c37a9cc0c66008a298c1e6b9e.1655828070.git.pabeni@redhat.com>

After commit 4890b686f408 ("net: keep sk->sk_forward_alloc as small as
possible"), the MPTCP protocol is the last SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK and
SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD users.

Update the MPTCP reclaim schema to match the core/TCP one and drop the
mentioned macros. This additionally clean the MPTCP code a bit.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 35 ++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 0d4b2c010da0..b31bac33f87a 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ static void mptcp_rmem_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int size)
 	reclaimable = msk->rmem_fwd_alloc - sk_unused_reserved_mem(sk);
 
 	/* see sk_mem_uncharge() for the rationale behind the following schema */
-	if (unlikely(reclaimable >= SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD))
-		__mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK);
+	if (unlikely(reclaimable >= PAGE_SIZE))
+		__mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, reclaimable);
 }
 
 static void mptcp_rfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -961,25 +961,6 @@ static bool mptcp_frag_can_collapse_to(const struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 		df->data_seq + df->data_len == msk->write_seq;
 }
 
-static void __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(struct sock *sk)
-{
-	int reclaimable = mptcp_sk(sk)->rmem_fwd_alloc - sk_unused_reserved_mem(sk);
-
-	lockdep_assert_held_once(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
-
-	if (reclaimable > (int)PAGE_SIZE)
-		__mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, reclaimable - 1);
-
-	sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
-}
-
-static void mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(struct sock *sk)
-{
-	mptcp_data_lock(sk);
-	__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
-	mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
-}
-
 static void dfrag_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int len)
 {
 	sk_mem_uncharge(sk, len);
@@ -999,7 +980,6 @@ static void __mptcp_clean_una(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dtmp, *dfrag;
-	bool cleaned = false;
 	u64 snd_una;
 
 	/* on fallback we just need to ignore snd_una, as this is really
@@ -1022,7 +1002,6 @@ static void __mptcp_clean_una(struct sock *sk)
 		}
 
 		dfrag_clear(sk, dfrag);
-		cleaned = true;
 	}
 
 	dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
@@ -1044,7 +1023,6 @@ static void __mptcp_clean_una(struct sock *sk)
 		dfrag->already_sent -= delta;
 
 		dfrag_uncharge(sk, delta);
-		cleaned = true;
 	}
 
 	/* all retransmitted data acked, recovery completed */
@@ -1052,9 +1030,6 @@ static void __mptcp_clean_una(struct sock *sk)
 		msk->recovery = false;
 
 out:
-	if (cleaned && tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk))
-		__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
-
 	if (snd_una == READ_ONCE(msk->snd_nxt) &&
 	    snd_una == READ_ONCE(msk->write_seq)) {
 		if (mptcp_timer_pending(sk) && !mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk))
@@ -1206,12 +1181,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *mptcp_alloc_tx_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, boo
 {
 	gfp_t gfp = data_lock_held ? GFP_ATOMIC : sk->sk_allocation;
 
-	if (unlikely(tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk))) {
-		if (data_lock_held)
-			__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
-		else
-			mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
-	}
 	return __mptcp_alloc_tx_skb(sk, ssk, gfp);
 }
 
-- 
2.35.3


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-21 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-21 16:27 [PATCH v4 mptcp-next 1/4] mptcp: never fetch fwd memory from the subflow Paolo Abeni
2022-06-21 16:27 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2022-06-21 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 mptcp-next 3/4] mptcp: refine memory scheduling Paolo Abeni
2022-06-21 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 mptcp-next 4/4] net: remove SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD and SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK Paolo Abeni
2022-06-21 22:38   ` Mat Martineau
2022-06-22 21:09     ` Matthieu Baerts
2022-06-21 22:35 ` [PATCH v4 mptcp-next 1/4] mptcp: never fetch fwd memory from the subflow Mat Martineau
2022-06-21 22:46   ` Mat Martineau
2022-06-22  8:31     ` Paolo Abeni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7884c6176c0dc56361a5cc365215333b5b81ec2.1655828070.git.pabeni@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).